1,109 research outputs found
Quantum Reverse Shannon Theorem
Dual to the usual noisy channel coding problem, where a noisy (classical or
quantum) channel is used to simulate a noiseless one, reverse Shannon theorems
concern the use of noiseless channels to simulate noisy ones, and more
generally the use of one noisy channel to simulate another. For channels of
nonzero capacity, this simulation is always possible, but for it to be
efficient, auxiliary resources of the proper kind and amount are generally
required. In the classical case, shared randomness between sender and receiver
is a sufficient auxiliary resource, regardless of the nature of the source, but
in the quantum case the requisite auxiliary resources for efficient simulation
depend on both the channel being simulated, and the source from which the
channel inputs are coming. For tensor power sources (the quantum generalization
of classical IID sources), entanglement in the form of standard ebits
(maximally entangled pairs of qubits) is sufficient, but for general sources,
which may be arbitrarily correlated or entangled across channel inputs,
additional resources, such as entanglement-embezzling states or backward
communication, are generally needed. Combining existing and new results, we
establish the amounts of communication and auxiliary resources needed in both
the classical and quantum cases, the tradeoffs among them, and the loss of
simulation efficiency when auxiliary resources are absent or insufficient. In
particular we find a new single-letter expression for the excess forward
communication cost of coherent feedback simulations of quantum channels (i.e.
simulations in which the sender retains what would escape into the environment
in an ordinary simulation), on non-tensor-power sources in the presence of
unlimited ebits but no other auxiliary resource. Our results on tensor power
sources establish a strong converse to the entanglement-assisted capacity
theorem.Comment: 35 pages, to appear in IEEE-IT. v2 has a fixed proof of the Clueless
Eve result, a new single-letter formula for the "spread deficit", better
error scaling, and an improved strong converse. v3 and v4 each make small
improvements to the presentation and add references. v5 fixes broken
reference
Strong ETH Breaks With Merlin and Arthur: Short Non-Interactive Proofs of Batch Evaluation
We present an efficient proof system for Multipoint Arithmetic Circuit
Evaluation: for every arithmetic circuit of size and
degree over a field , and any inputs ,
the Prover sends the Verifier the values and a proof of length, and
the Verifier tosses coins and can check the proof in about time, with probability of error less than .
For small degree , this "Merlin-Arthur" proof system (a.k.a. MA-proof
system) runs in nearly-linear time, and has many applications. For example, we
obtain MA-proof systems that run in time (for various ) for the
Permanent, Circuit-SAT for all sublinear-depth circuits, counting
Hamiltonian cycles, and infeasibility of - linear programs. In general,
the value of any polynomial in Valiant's class can be certified
faster than "exhaustive summation" over all possible assignments. These results
strongly refute a Merlin-Arthur Strong ETH and Arthur-Merlin Strong ETH posed
by Russell Impagliazzo and others.
We also give a three-round (AMA) proof system for quantified Boolean formulas
running in time, nearly-linear time MA-proof systems for
counting orthogonal vectors in a collection and finding Closest Pairs in the
Hamming metric, and a MA-proof system running in -time for
counting -cliques in graphs.
We point to some potential future directions for refuting the
Nondeterministic Strong ETH.Comment: 17 page
- β¦