Out-Of-Place debugging: a debugging architecture to reduce debugging interference

Context. Recent studies show that developers spend most of their programming time testing, verifying and debugging software. As applications become more and more complex, developers demand more advanced debugging support to ease the software development process. Inquiry. Since the 70's many debugging solutions were introduced. Amongst them, online debuggers provide a good insight on the conditions that led to a bug, allowing inspection and interaction with the variables of the program. However, most of the online debugging solutions introduce \textit{debugging interference} to the execution of the program, i.e. pauses, latency, and evaluation of code containing side-effects. Approach. This paper investigates a novel debugging technique called \outofplace debugging. The goal is to minimize the debugging interference characteristic of online debugging while allowing online remote capabilities. An \outofplace debugger transfers the program execution and application state from the debugged application to the debugger application, both running in different processes. Knowledge. On the one hand, \outofplace debugging allows developers to debug applications remotely, overcoming the need of physical access to the machine where the debugged application is running. On the other hand, debugging happens locally on the remote machine avoiding latency. That makes it suitable to be deployed on a distributed system and handle the debugging of several processes running in parallel. Grounding. We implemented a concrete out-of-place debugger for the Pharo Smalltalk programming language. We show that our approach is practical by performing several benchmarks, comparing our approach with a classic remote online debugger. We show that our prototype debugger outperforms by a 1000 times a traditional remote debugger in several scenarios. Moreover, we show that the presence of our debugger does not impact the overall performance of an application. Importance. This work combines remote debugging with the debugging experience of a local online debugger. Out-of-place debugging is the first online debugging technique that can minimize debugging interference while debugging a remote application. Yet, it still keeps the benefits of online debugging ( e.g. step-by-step execution). This makes the technique suitable for modern applications which are increasingly parallel, distributed and reactive to streams of data from various sources like sensors, UI, network, etc

Efficient hardware debugging using parameterized FPGA reconfiguration

Functional errors and bugs inadvertently introduced at the RTL stage of the design process are responsible for the largest fraction of silicon IC re-spins. Thus, comprehensive func- tional verification is the key to reduce development costs and to deliver a product in time. The increasing demands for verification led to an increase in FPGA-based tools that perform emulation. These tools can run at much higher operating frequencies and achieve higher coverage than simulation. However, an important pitfall of the FPGA tools is that they suffer from limited internal signal observability, as only a small and preselected set of signals is guided towards (embedded) trace buffers and observed. This paper proposes a dynamically reconfigurable network of multiplexers that significantly enhance the visibility of internal signals. It allows the designer to dynamically change the small set of internal signals to be observed, virtually enlarging the set of observed signals significantly. These multiplexers occupy minimal space, as they are implemented by the FPGA’s routing infrastructure

Comparing the effectiveness of testing methods in improving programs: the effect of variations in program quality

We compare the efficacy of different testing methods for improving the reliability of software. Specifically, we use modelling to compare “operational” testing, in which test cases are chosen according to their probability of occurring in actual use of the software, against “debug” testing methods, in which the testers look for test cases which they consider likely to cause failure, or that satisfy some coverage criterion. We base our comparisons on the reliability reached by the program at the end of testing. Differently from previous studies, we consider the probability distribution of the achieved reliability, and thus the probability of satisfying specific requirements, rather than just the average reliability achieved. We take account of two sources of variation. The variation between the actual test histories that are possible for a given program and a given test method: and the fact that different programs start testing with different faults and initial reliability levels. By necessity, we use very simplified models of reality. Yet, we can show some interesting conclusions with important practical consequences. In general, there are stronger arguments in favor of operational testing than previous studies have show