General Ramified Recurrence is Sound for Polynomial Time

Leivant's ramified recurrence is one of the earliest examples of an implicit characterization of the polytime functions as a subalgebra of the primitive recursive functions. Leivant's result, however, is originally stated and proved only for word algebras, i.e. free algebras whose constructors take at most one argument. This paper presents an extension of these results to ramified functions on any free algebras, provided the underlying terms are represented as graphs rather than trees, so that sharing of identical subterms can be exploited

Transfinite reductions in orthogonal term rewriting systems

Strongly convergent reduction is the fundamental notion of reduction in infinitary orthogonal term rewriting systems (OTRSs). For these we prove the Transfinite Parallel Moves Lemma and the Compressing Lemma. Strongness is necessary as shown by counterexamples. Normal forms, which we allow to be infinite, are unique, in contrast to ω-normal forms. Strongly converging fair reductions result in normal forms. In general OTRSs the infinite Church-Rosser Property fails for strongly converging reductions. However for Böhm reduction (as in Lambda Calculus, subterms without head normal forms may be replaced by ⊥) the infinite Church-Rosser property does hold. The infinite Church-Rosser Property for non-unifiable OTRSs follows. The top-terminating OTRSs of Dershowitz c.s. are examples of non-unifiable OTRSs

Lambda Calculus with Explicit Recursion

AbstractThis paper is concerned with the study ofλ-calculus with explicit recursion, namely of cyclicλ-graphs. The starting point is to treat aλ-graph as a system of recursion equations involvingλ-terms and to manipulate such systems in an unrestricted manner, using equational logic, just as is possible for first-order term rewriting. Surprisingly, now the confluence property breaks down in an essential way. Confluence can be restored by introducing a restraining mechanism on the substitution operation. This leads to a family ofλ-graph calculi, which can be seen as an extension of the family ofλσ-calculi (λ-calculi with explicit substitution). While theλσ-calculi treat the let-construct as a first-class citizen, our calculi support the letrec, a feature that is essential to reason about time and space behavior of functional languages and also about compilation and optimizations of program

Adequacy Issues in Reactive Systems: Barbed Semantics for Mobile Ambients

Reactive systems represent a meta-framework aimed at deriving behavioral congruences for those specification formalisms whose operational semantics is provided by rewriting rules. The aim of this thesis is to address one of the main issues of the framework, concerning the adequacy of the standard observational semantics (the IPO and the saturated one) in modelling the concrete semantics of actual formalisms. The problem is that IPO-bisimilarity (obtained considering only minimal labels) is often too discriminating, while the saturated one (via all labels) may be too coarse, and intermediate proposals should then be put forward. We then introduce a more expressive semantics for reactive systems which, thanks to its flexibility, allows for recasting a wide variety of observational, bisimulation-based equivalences. In particular, we propose suitable notions of barbed and weak barbed semantics for reactive systems, and an efficient characterization of them through the IPO-transition systems. We also propose a novel, more general behavioural equivalence: L-bisimilarity, which is able to recast both its IPO and saturated counterparts, as well as the barbed one. The equivalence is parametric with respect to a set L of reactive systems labels, and it is shown that under mild conditions on L it is a congruence. In order to provide a suitable test-bed, we instantiate our proposal over the asynchronous CCS and, most importantly, over the mobile ambients calculus, whose semantics is still in a flux

Term graph rewriting and garbage collection using opfibrations

AbstractThe categorical semantics of (an abstract version of) the general term graph rewriting language DACTL is investigated. The operational semantics is reformulated in order to reveal its universal properties. The technical dissonance between the matchings of left-hand sides of rules to redexes, and the properties of rewrite rules themselves, is taken as the impetus for expressing the core of the model as a Grothendieck opfibration of a category of general rewrites over a base of general rewrite rules. Garbage collection is examined in this framework in order to reconcile the treatment with earlier approaches. It is shown that term rewriting has particularly good garbage-theoretic properties that do not generalise to all cases of graph rewriting and that this has been a stumbling block for aspects of some earlier models for graph rewriting

Expressibility in the Lambda Calculus with Letrec

We investigate the relationship between finite terms in lambda-letrec, the lambda calculus with letrec, and the infinite lambda terms they express. As there are easy examples of lambda-terms that, intuitively, are not unfoldings of terms in lambda-letrec, we consider the question: How can those infinite lambda terms be characterised that are lamda-letrec-expressible in the sense that they can be obtained as infinite unfoldings of terms in lambda-letrec? For 'observing' infinite lambda-terms through repeated 'experiments' carried out at the head of the term we introduce two rewrite systems (with rewrite relations) -reg-> and -reg+-> that decompose the term, and produce 'generated subterms' in two notions. Thereby the sort of the step can be observed as well as its target, a generated subterm. In both systems there are four sorts of decomposition steps: -lambda-> steps (decomposing a lambda-abstraction), -@0> and -@1> steps (decomposing an application into its function and argument), and respectively, -del-> steps (delimiting the scope of an abstraction, for -reg->), and -S-> (delimiting of scopes, for -reg+->). These steps take place on infinite lambda-terms furnished with a leading prefix of abstractions for gathering previously encountered lambda-abstractions and keeping the generated subterms closed. We call an infinite lambda-term 'regular'/'strongly regular' if its set of -reg-> -reachable / -reg-> -reachable generated subterms is finite. Furthermore, we analyse the binding structure of lambda-terms with the concept of 'binding-capturing chain'. Using these concepts, we answer the question above by providing two characterisations of lambda-letrec-expressibility. For all infinite lambda-terms M, the following statements are equivalent: (i) M is lambda-letrec-expressible; (ii) M is strongly regular; (iii) M is regular, and it only has finite binding-capturing chains.Comment: 79 pages, 25 figure