Brain-Inspired Computational Intelligence via Predictive Coding

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming one of the key technologies of this century. The majority of results in AI thus far have been achieved using deep neural networks trained with the error backpropagation learning algorithm. However, the ubiquitous adoption of this approach has highlighted some important limitations such as substantial computational cost, difficulty in quantifying uncertainty, lack of robustness, unreliability, and biological implausibility. It is possible that addressing these limitations may require schemes that are inspired and guided by neuroscience theories. One such theory, called predictive coding (PC), has shown promising performance in machine intelligence tasks, exhibiting exciting properties that make it potentially valuable for the machine learning community: PC can model information processing in different brain areas, can be used in cognitive control and robotics, and has a solid mathematical grounding in variational inference, offering a powerful inversion scheme for a specific class of continuous-state generative models. With the hope of foregrounding research in this direction, we survey the literature that has contributed to this perspective, highlighting the many ways that PC might play a role in the future of machine learning and computational intelligence at large.Comment: 37 Pages, 9 Figure

Differential Dynamic Programming for time-delayed systems

Trajectory optimization considers the problem of deciding how to control a dynamical system to move along a trajectory which minimizes some cost function. Differential Dynamic Programming (DDP) is an optimal control method which utilizes a second-order approximation of the problem to find the control. It is fast enough to allow real-time control and has been shown to work well for trajectory optimization in robotic systems. Here we extend classic DDP to systems with multiple time-delays in the state. Being able to find optimal trajectories for time-delayed systems with DDP opens up the possibility to use richer models for system identification and control, including recurrent neural networks with multiple timesteps in the state. We demonstrate the algorithm on a two-tank continuous stirred tank reactor. We also demonstrate the algorithm on a recurrent neural network trained to model an inverted pendulum with position information only.Comment: 7 pages, 6 figures, conference, Decision and Control (CDC), 2016 IEEE 55th Conference o

MATLAB SIMULATION OF THE HYBRID OF RECURSIVE NEURAL DYNAMICS FOR ONLINE MATRIX INVERSION

A novel kind of a hybrid recursive neural implicit dynamics for real-time matrix inversion has been recently proposed and investigated. Our goal is to compare the hybrid recursive neural implicit dynamics on the one hand, and conventional explicit neural dynamics on the other hand. Simulation results show that the hybrid model can coincide better with systems in practice and has higher abilities in representing dynamic systems. More importantly, hybrid model can achieve superior convergence performance in comparison with the existing dynamic systems, specifically recently-proposed Zhang dynamics. This paper presents the Simulink model of a hybrid recursive neural implicit dynamics and gives a simulation and comparison to the existing Zhang dynamics for real-time matrix inversion. Simulation results confirm a superior convergence of the hybrid model compared to Zhang model

Design and Comprehensive Analysis of a Noise-Tolerant ZNN Model With Limited-Time Convergence for Time-Dependent Nonlinear Minimization

Zeroing neural network (ZNN) is a powerful tool to address the mathematical and optimization problems broadly arisen in the science and engineering areas. The convergence and robustness are always co-pursued in ZNN. However, there exists no related work on the ZNN for time-dependent nonlinear minimization that achieves simultaneously limited-time convergence and inherently noise suppression. In this article, for the purpose of satisfying such two requirements, a limited-time robust neural network (LTRNN) is devised and presented to solve time-dependent nonlinear minimization under various external disturbances. Different from the previous ZNN model for this problem either with limited-time convergence or with noise suppression, the proposed LTRNN model simultaneously possesses such two characteristics. Besides, rigorous theoretical analyses are given to prove the superior performance of the LTRNN model when adopted to solve time-dependent nonlinear minimization under external disturbances. Comparative results also substantiate the effectiveness and advantages of LTRNN via solving a time-dependent nonlinear minimization problem

Steepest descent as Linear Quadratic Regulation

Concorder un modèle à certaines observations, voilà qui résume assez bien ce que l’apprentissage machine cherche à accomplir. Ce concept est maintenant omniprésent dans nos vies, entre autre grâce aux percées récentes en apprentissage profond. La stratégie d’optimisation prédominante pour ces deux domaines est la minimisation d’un objectif donné. Et pour cela, la méthode du gradient, méthode de premier-ordre qui modifie les paramètres du modèle à chaque itération, est l’approche dominante. À l’opposé, les méthodes dites de second ordre n’ont jamais réussi à s’imposer en apprentissage profond. Pourtant, elles offrent des avantages reconnus qui soulèvent encore un grand intérêt. D’où l’importance de la méthode du col, qui unifie les méthodes de premier et second ordre sous un même paradigme. Dans ce mémoire, nous établissons un parralèle direct entre la méthode du col et le domaine du contrôle optimal ; domaine qui cherche à optimiser mathématiquement une séquence de décisions. Et certains des problèmes les mieux compris et étudiés en contrôle optimal sont les commandes linéaires quadratiques. Problèmes pour lesquels on connaît très bien la solution optimale. Plus spécifiquement, nous démontrerons l’équivalence entre une itération de la méthode du col et la résolution d’une Commande Linéaire Quadratique (CLQ). Cet éclairage nouveau implique une approche unifiée quand vient le temps de déployer nombre d’algorithmes issus de la méthode du col, tel que la méthode du gradient et celle des gradients naturels, sans être limitée à ceux-ci. Approche que nous étendons ensuite aux problèmes à horizon infini, tel que les modèles à équilibre profond. Ce faisant, nous démontrons pour ces problèmes que calculer les gradients via la différentiation implicite revient à employer l’équation de Riccati pour solutionner la CLQ associée à la méthode du gradient. Finalement, notons que l’incorporation d’information sur la courbure du problème revient généralement à rencontrer une inversion matricielle dans la méthode du col. Nous montrons que l’équivalence avec les CLQ permet de contourner cette inversion en utilisant une approximation issue des séries de Neumann. Surprenamment, certaines observations empiriques suggèrent que cette approximation aide aussi à stabiliser le processus d’optimisation quand des méthodes de second-ordre sont impliquées ; en agissant comme un régularisateur adaptif implicite.Machine learning entails training a model to fit some given observations, and recent advances in the field, particularly in deep learning, have made it omnipresent in our lives. Fitting a model usually requires the minimization of a given objective. When it comes to deep learning, first-order methods like gradient descent have become a default tool for optimization in deep learning. On the other hand, second-order methods did not see widespread use in deep learning. Yet, they hold many promises and are still a very active field of research. An important perspective into both methods is steepest descent, which allows you to encompass first and second-order approaches into the same framework. In this thesis, we establish an explicit connection between steepest descent and optimal control, a field that tries to optimize sequential decision-making processes. Core to it is the family of problems known as Linear Quadratic Regulation; problems that have been well studied and for which we know optimal solutions. More specifically, we show that performing one iteration of steepest descent is equivalent to solving a Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR). This perspective gives us a convenient and unified framework for deploying a wide range of steepest descent algorithms, such as gradient descent and natural gradient descent, but certainly not limited to. This framework can also be extended to problems with an infinite horizon, such as deep equilibrium models. Doing so reveals that retrieving the gradient via implicit differentiation is equivalent to recovering it via Riccati’s solution to the LQR associated with gradient descent. Finally, incorporating curvature information into steepest descent usually takes the form of a matrix inversion. However, casting a steepest descent step as a LQR also hints toward a trick that allows to sidestep this inversion, by leveraging Neumann’s series approximation. Empirical observations provide evidence that this approximation actually helps to stabilize the training process, by acting as an adaptive damping parameter