3,386 research outputs found
Sampling in the Analysis Transform Domain
Many signal and image processing applications have benefited remarkably from
the fact that the underlying signals reside in a low dimensional subspace. One
of the main models for such a low dimensionality is the sparsity one. Within
this framework there are two main options for the sparse modeling: the
synthesis and the analysis ones, where the first is considered the standard
paradigm for which much more research has been dedicated. In it the signals are
assumed to have a sparse representation under a given dictionary. On the other
hand, in the analysis approach the sparsity is measured in the coefficients of
the signal after applying a certain transformation, the analysis dictionary, on
it. Though several algorithms with some theory have been developed for this
framework, they are outnumbered by the ones proposed for the synthesis
methodology.
Given that the analysis dictionary is either a frame or the two dimensional
finite difference operator, we propose a new sampling scheme for signals from
the analysis model that allows to recover them from their samples using any
existing algorithm from the synthesis model. The advantage of this new sampling
strategy is that it makes the existing synthesis methods with their theory also
available for signals from the analysis framework.Comment: 13 Pages, 2 figure
On the Effective Measure of Dimension in the Analysis Cosparse Model
Many applications have benefited remarkably from low-dimensional models in
the recent decade. The fact that many signals, though high dimensional, are
intrinsically low dimensional has given the possibility to recover them stably
from a relatively small number of their measurements. For example, in
compressed sensing with the standard (synthesis) sparsity prior and in matrix
completion, the number of measurements needed is proportional (up to a
logarithmic factor) to the signal's manifold dimension.
Recently, a new natural low-dimensional signal model has been proposed: the
cosparse analysis prior. In the noiseless case, it is possible to recover
signals from this model, using a combinatorial search, from a number of
measurements proportional to the signal's manifold dimension. However, if we
ask for stability to noise or an efficient (polynomial complexity) solver, all
the existing results demand a number of measurements which is far removed from
the manifold dimension, sometimes far greater. Thus, it is natural to ask
whether this gap is a deficiency of the theory and the solvers, or if there
exists a real barrier in recovering the cosparse signals by relying only on
their manifold dimension. Is there an algorithm which, in the presence of
noise, can accurately recover a cosparse signal from a number of measurements
proportional to the manifold dimension? In this work, we prove that there is no
such algorithm. Further, we show through numerical simulations that even in the
noiseless case convex relaxations fail when the number of measurements is
comparable to the manifold dimension. This gives a practical counter-example to
the growing literature on compressed acquisition of signals based on manifold
dimension.Comment: 19 pages, 6 figure
Proceedings of the second "international Traveling Workshop on Interactions between Sparse models and Technology" (iTWIST'14)
The implicit objective of the biennial "international - Traveling Workshop on
Interactions between Sparse models and Technology" (iTWIST) is to foster
collaboration between international scientific teams by disseminating ideas
through both specific oral/poster presentations and free discussions. For its
second edition, the iTWIST workshop took place in the medieval and picturesque
town of Namur in Belgium, from Wednesday August 27th till Friday August 29th,
2014. The workshop was conveniently located in "The Arsenal" building within
walking distance of both hotels and town center. iTWIST'14 has gathered about
70 international participants and has featured 9 invited talks, 10 oral
presentations, and 14 posters on the following themes, all related to the
theory, application and generalization of the "sparsity paradigm":
Sparsity-driven data sensing and processing; Union of low dimensional
subspaces; Beyond linear and convex inverse problem; Matrix/manifold/graph
sensing/processing; Blind inverse problems and dictionary learning; Sparsity
and computational neuroscience; Information theory, geometry and randomness;
Complexity/accuracy tradeoffs in numerical methods; Sparsity? What's next?;
Sparse machine learning and inference.Comment: 69 pages, 24 extended abstracts, iTWIST'14 website:
http://sites.google.com/site/itwist1
Low Complexity Regularization of Linear Inverse Problems
Inverse problems and regularization theory is a central theme in contemporary
signal processing, where the goal is to reconstruct an unknown signal from
partial indirect, and possibly noisy, measurements of it. A now standard method
for recovering the unknown signal is to solve a convex optimization problem
that enforces some prior knowledge about its structure. This has proved
efficient in many problems routinely encountered in imaging sciences,
statistics and machine learning. This chapter delivers a review of recent
advances in the field where the regularization prior promotes solutions
conforming to some notion of simplicity/low-complexity. These priors encompass
as popular examples sparsity and group sparsity (to capture the compressibility
of natural signals and images), total variation and analysis sparsity (to
promote piecewise regularity), and low-rank (as natural extension of sparsity
to matrix-valued data). Our aim is to provide a unified treatment of all these
regularizations under a single umbrella, namely the theory of partial
smoothness. This framework is very general and accommodates all low-complexity
regularizers just mentioned, as well as many others. Partial smoothness turns
out to be the canonical way to encode low-dimensional models that can be linear
spaces or more general smooth manifolds. This review is intended to serve as a
one stop shop toward the understanding of the theoretical properties of the
so-regularized solutions. It covers a large spectrum including: (i) recovery
guarantees and stability to noise, both in terms of -stability and
model (manifold) identification; (ii) sensitivity analysis to perturbations of
the parameters involved (in particular the observations), with applications to
unbiased risk estimation ; (iii) convergence properties of the forward-backward
proximal splitting scheme, that is particularly well suited to solve the
corresponding large-scale regularized optimization problem
- …