A computational framework to benchmark basket catheter guided ablation in atrial fibrillation

Catheter ablation is a curative therapeutic approach for atrial fibrillation (AF). Ablation of rotational sources based on basket catheter measurements has been proposed as a promising approach in patients with persistent AF to complement pulmonary vein isolation. However, clinically reported success rates are equivocal calling for a mechanistic investigation under controlled conditions. We present a computational framework to benchmark ablation strategies considering the whole cycle from excitation propagation to electrogram acquisition and processing to virtual therapy. Fibrillation was induced in a patient-specific 3D volumetric model of the left atrium, which was homogeneously remodeled to sustain reentry. The resulting extracellular potential field was sampled using models of grid catheters as well as realistically deformed basket catheters considering the specific atrial anatomy. The virtual electrograms were processed to compute phase singularity density maps to target rotor tips with up to three circular ablations. Stable rotors were successfully induced in different regions of the homogeneously remodeled atrium showing that rotors are not constrained to unique anatomical structures or locations. Density maps of rotor tip trajectories correctly identified and located the rotors (deviation < 10 mm) based on catheter recordings only for sufficient resolution (inter-electrode distance ≤3 mm) and proximity to the wall (≤10 mm). Targeting rotor sites with ablation did not stop reentries in the homogeneously remodeled atria independent from lesion size (1–7 mm radius), from linearly connecting lesions with anatomical obstacles, and from the number of rotors targeted sequentially (≤3). Our results show that phase maps derived from intracardiac electrograms can be a powerful tool to map atrial activation patterns, yet they can also be misleading due to inaccurate localization of the rotor tip depending on electrode resolution and distance to the wall. This should be considered to avoid ablating regions that are in fact free of rotor sources of AF. In our experience, ablation of rotor sites was not successful to stop fibrillation. Our comprehensive simulation framework provides the means to holistically benchmark ablation strategies in silico under consideration of all steps involved in electrogram-based therapy and, in future, could be used to study more heterogeneously remodeled disease states as well

Multichannel Analysis of Intracardiac Electrograms - Supporting Diagnosis and Treatment of Cardiac Arrhythmias

Cardiologists diagnose and treat atrial tachycardias using electroanatomical mapping systems. These can be combined with multipolar catheters to record intracardiac electrograms. Within this thesis, various signal processing techniques were implemented and benchmarked to analyze electrograms. They support the physician in diagnosis and treatment of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation. The developed methods were assessed using simulated data and demonstrated on clinical cases

A Computational Framework to Benchmark Basket Catheter Guided Ablation in Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation is a curative therapeutic approach for atrial fibrillation (AF). Ablation of rotational sources based on basket catheter measurements has been proposed as a promising approach in patients with persistent AF to complement pulmonary vein isolation. However, clinically reported success rates are equivocal calling for a mechanistic investigation under controlled conditions. We present a computational framework to benchmark ablation strategies considering the whole cycle from excitation propagation to electrogram acquisition and processing to virtual therapy. Fibrillation was induced in a patient-specific 3D volumetric model of the left atrium, which was homogeneously remodeled to sustain reentry. The resulting extracellular potential field was sampled using models of grid catheters as well as realistically deformed basket catheters considering the specific atrial anatomy. The virtual electrograms were processed to compute phase singularity density maps to target rotor tips with up to three circular ablations. Stable rotors were successfully induced in different regions of the homogeneously remodeled atrium showing that rotors are not constrained to unique anatomical structures or locations. Density maps of rotor tip trajectories correctly identified and located the rotors (deviation &lt; 10 mm) based on catheter recordings only for sufficient resolution (inter-electrode distance ≤3 mm) and proximity to the wall (≤10 mm). Targeting rotor sites with ablation did not stop reentries in the homogeneously remodeled atria independent from lesion size (1–7 mm radius), from linearly connecting lesions with anatomical obstacles, and from the number of rotors targeted sequentially (≤3). Our results show that phase maps derived from intracardiac electrograms can be a powerful tool to map atrial activation patterns, yet they can also be misleading due to inaccurate localization of the rotor tip depending on electrode resolution and distance to the wall. This should be considered to avoid ablating regions that are in fact free of rotor sources of AF. In our experience, ablation of rotor sites was not successful to stop fibrillation. Our comprehensive simulation framework provides the means to holistically benchmark ablation strategies in silico under consideration of all steps involved in electrogram-based therapy and, in future, could be used to study more heterogeneously remodeled disease states as well

Mapping Technologies for Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Catheter ablation remains the most effective and relatively minimally invasive therapy for rhythm control in patients with AF. Ablation has consistently shown a reduction of arrhythmia-related symptoms and significant improvement in patients’ quality of life compared with medical treatment. The ablation strategy relies on a well-established anatomical approach of effective pulmonary vein isolation. Additional anatomical targets have been reported with the aim of increasing procedure success in complex substrates. However, larger ablated areas with uncertainty of targeting relevant regions for AF initiation or maintenance are not exempt from the potential risk of complications and pro-arrhythmia. Recent developments in mapping tools and computational methods for advanced signal processing during AF have reported novel strategies to identify atrial regions associated with AF maintenance. These novel tools – although mainly limited to research series – represent a significant step forward towards the understanding of complex patterns of propagation during AF and the potential achievement of patient-tailored AF ablation strategies for the near future

Challenges associated with interpreting mechanisms of AF

Determining optimal treatment strategies for complex arrhythmogenesis in AF is confounded by the lack of consensus regarding the mechanisms causing AF. Studies report different mechanisms for AF, ranging from hierarchical drivers to anarchical multiple activation wavelets. Differences in the assessment of AF mechanisms are likely due to AF being recorded across diverse models using different investigational tools, spatial scales and clinical populations. The authors review different AF mechanisms, including anatomical and functional re-entry, hierarchical drivers and anarchical multiple wavelets. They then describe different cardiac mapping techniques and analysis tools, including activation mapping, phase mapping and fibrosis identification. They explain and review different data challenges, including differences between recording devices in spatial and temporal resolutions, spatial coverage and recording surface, and report clinical outcomes using different data modalities. They suggest future research directions for investigating the mechanisms underlying human AF

Standardizing Single-Frame Phase Singularity Identification Algorithms and Parameters in Phase Mapping During Human Atrial Fibrillation

[EN] Purpose Recent investigations failed to reproduce the positive rotor-guided ablation outcomes shown by initial studies for treating persistent atrial fibrillation (persAF). Phase singularity (PS) is an important feature for AF driver detection, but algorithms for automated PS identification differ. We aim to investigate the performance of four different techniques for automated PS detection. Methods 2048-channel virtual electrogram (VEGM) and electrocardiogram signals were collected for 30 s from 10 patients undergoing persAF ablation. QRST-subtraction was performed and VEGMs were processed using sinusoidal wavelet reconstruction. The phase was obtained using Hilbert transform. PSs were detected using four algorithms: (1) 2D image processing based and neighbor-indexing algorithm; (2) 3D neighbor-indexing algorithm; (3) 2D kernel convolutional algorithm estimating topological charge; (4) topological charge estimation on 3D mesh. PS annotations were compared using the structural similarity index (SSIM) and Pearson's correlation coefficient (CORR). Optimized parameters to improve detection accuracy were found for all four algorithms usingF(beta)score and 10-fold cross-validation compared with manual annotation. Local clustering with density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) was proposed to improve algorithms 3 and 4. Results The PS density maps created by each algorithm with default parameters were poorly correlated. Phase gradient threshold and search radius (or kernels) were shown to affect PS detections. The processing times for the algorithms were significantly different (p< 0.0001). TheF(beta)scores for algorithms 1, 2, 3, 3 + DBSCAN, 4 and 4 + DBSCAN were 0.547, 0.645, 0.742, 0.828, 0.656, and 0.831. Algorithm 4 + DBSCAN achieved the best classification performance with acceptable processing time (2.0 +/- 0.3 s). Conclusion AF driver identification is dependent on the PS detection algorithms and their parameters, which could explain some of the inconsistencies in rotor-guided ablation outcomes in different studies. For 3D triangulated meshes, algorithm 4 + DBSCAN with optimal parameters was the best solution for real-time, automated PS detection due to accuracy and speed. Similarly, algorithm 3 + DBSCAN with optimal parameters is preferred for uniform 2D meshes. Such algorithms - and parameters - should be preferred in future clinical studies for identifying AF drivers and minimizing methodological heterogeneities. This would facilitate comparisons in rotor-guided ablation outcomes in future works.This work was supported by the NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, UK. XL received research grants from Medical Research Council UK (MRC DPFS Ref: MR/S037306/1). TA received research grants from the British Heart Foundation (BHF Project Grant No. PG/18/33/33780), BHF Research Accelerator Award funding and Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP, Brazil, Grant No. 2017/00319-8). MG research was funded by a research grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain: PI13-00903). GN received funding from the British Heart Foundation (BHF Programme Grant, RG/17/3/32774).Li, X.; Almeida, TP.; Dastagir, N.; Guillem Sánchez, MS.; Salinet, J.; Chu, GS.; Stafford, PJ.... (2020). Standardizing Single-Frame Phase Singularity Identification Algorithms and Parameters in Phase Mapping During Human Atrial Fibrillation. Frontiers in Physiology. 11:1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2020.00869S11611ALHUSSEINI, M., VIDMAR, D., MECKLER, G. L., KOWALEWSKI, C. A., SHENASA, F., WANG, P. J., … RAPPEL, W.-J. (2017). Two Independent Mapping Techniques Identify Rotational Activity Patterns at Sites of Local Termination During Persistent Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 28(6), 615-622. doi:10.1111/jce.13177Allessie, M. A., de Groot, N. M. S., Houben, R. P. M., Schotten, U., Boersma, E., Smeets, J. L., & Crijns, H. J. (2010). Electropathological Substrate of Long-Standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 3(6), 606-615. doi:10.1161/circep.109.910125Benharash, P., Buch, E., Frank, P., Share, M., Tung, R., Shivkumar, K., & Mandapati, R. (2015). Quantitative Analysis of Localized Sources Identified by Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 8(3), 554-561. doi:10.1161/circep.115.002721BRAY, M.-A., LIN, S.-F., ALIEV, R. R., ROTH, B. J., & WIKSWO, J. P. (2001). Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Phase Singularity Dynamics in Cardiac Tissue. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 12(6), 716-722. doi:10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00716.xBray, M.-A., & Wikswo, J. P. (2002). Use of topological charge to determine filament location and dynamics in a numerical model of scroll wave activity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 49(10), 1086-1093. doi:10.1109/tbme.2002.803516Buch, E., Share, M., Tung, R., Benharash, P., Sharma, P., Koneru, J., … Shivkumar, K. (2016). Long-term clinical outcomes of focal impulse and rotor modulation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: A multicenter experience. Heart Rhythm, 13(3), 636-641. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.10.031Canny, J. (1986). A Computational Approach to Edge Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-8(6), 679-698. doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851Clayton, R. H., & Nash, M. P. (2015). Analysis of Cardiac Fibrillation Using Phase Mapping. Cardiac Electrophysiology Clinics, 7(1), 49-58. doi:10.1016/j.ccep.2014.11.011Davis, J., & Goadrich, M. (2006). The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML ’06. doi:10.1145/1143844.1143874De Groot, N. M. S., Houben, R. P. M., Smeets, J. L., Boersma, E., Schotten, U., Schalij, M. J., … Allessie, M. A. (2010). Electropathological Substrate of Longstanding Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease. Circulation, 122(17), 1674-1682. doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.910901Earley, M. J., Abrams, D. J. R., Sporton, S. C., & Schilling, R. J. (2006). Validation of the Noncontact Mapping System in the Left Atrium During Permanent Atrial Fibrillation and Sinus Rhythm. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 48(3), 485-491. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.069Gianni, C., Mohanty, S., Di Biase, L., Metz, T., Trivedi, C., Gökoğlan, Y., … Natale, A. (2016). Acute and early outcomes of focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM)-guided rotors-only ablation in patients with nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 13(4), 830-835. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.12.028GOJRATY, S., LAVI, N., VALLES, E., KIM, S. J., MICHELE, J., & GERSTENFELD, E. P. (2009). Dominant Frequency Mapping of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison of Contact and Noncontact Approaches. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20(9), 997-1004. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01488.xGrandi, E., Pandit, S. V., Voigt, N., Workman, A. J., Dobrev, D., Jalife, J., & Bers, D. M. (2011). Human Atrial Action Potential and Ca 2+ Model. Circulation Research, 109(9), 1055-1066. doi:10.1161/circresaha.111.253955Gray, R. A., Pertsov, A. M., & Jalife, J. (1998). Spatial and temporal organization during cardiac fibrillation. Nature, 392(6671), 75-78. doi:10.1038/32164Guillem, M. S., Climent, A. M., Millet, J., Arenal, Á., Fernández-Avilés, F., Jalife, J., … Berenfeld, O. (2013). Noninvasive Localization of Maximal Frequency Sites of Atrial Fibrillation by Body Surface Potential Mapping. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6(2), 294-301. doi:10.1161/circep.112.000167Guillem, M. S., Climent, A. M., Rodrigo, M., Fernández-Avilés, F., Atienza, F., & Berenfeld, O. (2016). Presence and stability of rotors in atrial fibrillation: evidence and therapeutic implications. Cardiovascular Research, 109(4), 480-492. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvw011Gurevich, D. R., & Grigoriev, R. O. (2019). Robust approach for rotor mapping in cardiac tissue. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 29(5), 053101. doi:10.1063/1.5086936HAISSAGUERRE, M., HOCINI, M., SHAH, A. J., DERVAL, N., SACHER, F., JAIS, P., & DUBOIS, R. (2013). Noninvasive Panoramic Mapping of Human Atrial Fibrillation Mechanisms: A Feasibility Report. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 24(6), 711-717. doi:10.1111/jce.12075Iyer, A. N., & Gray, R. A. (2001). An Experimentalist’s Approach to Accurate Localization of Phase Singularities during Reentry. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 29(1), 47-59. doi:10.1114/1.1335538Jalife, J. (2002). Mother rotors and fibrillatory conduction: a mechanism of atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular Research, 54(2), 204-216. doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00223-7Jalife, J., Filgueiras Rama, D., & Berenfeld, O. (2015). Letter by Jalife et al Regarding Article, «Quantitative Analysis of Localized Sources Identified by Focal Impulse and Rotor Modulation Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation». Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 8(5), 1296-1298. doi:10.1161/circep.115.003324Jarman, J. W. E., Wong, T., Kojodjojo, P., Spohr, H., Davies, J. E., Roughton, M., … Peters, N. S. (2012). Spatiotemporal Behavior of High Dominant Frequency During Paroxysmal and Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in the Human Left Atrium. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 5(4), 650-658. doi:10.1161/circep.111.967992Kuklik, P., Zeemering, S., Maesen, B., Maessen, J., Crijns, H. J., Verheule, S., … Schotten, U. (2015). Reconstruction of Instantaneous Phase of Unipolar Atrial Contact Electrogram Using a Concept of Sinusoidal Recomposition and Hilbert Transform. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 62(1), 296-302. doi:10.1109/tbme.2014.2350029Identification of Rotors during Human Atrial Fibrillation Using Contact Mapping and Phase Singularity Detection: Technical Considerations. (2017). IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 64(2), 310-318. doi:10.1109/tbme.2016.2554660Lee, Y.-S., Song, J.-S., Hwang, M., Lim, B., Joung, B., & Pak, H.-N. (2016). A New Efficient Method for Detecting Phase Singularity in Cardiac Fibrillation. PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0167567. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167567Li, X., Chu, G. S., Almeida, T. P., Salinet, J. L., Dastagir, N., Mistry, A. R., … André Ng, G. (2017). 5Characteristics of ablated rotors in terminating persistent atrial fibrillation using non-contact mapping. EP Europace, 19(suppl_1), i3-i3. doi:10.1093/europace/eux283.145Li, X., Salinet, J. L., Almeida, T. P., Vanheusden, F. J., Chu, G. S., Ng, G. A., & Schlindwein, F. S. (2017). An interactive platform to guide catheter ablation in human persistent atrial fibrillation using dominant frequency, organization and phase mapping. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 141, 83-92. doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.01.011Mandapati, R., Skanes, A., Chen, J., Berenfeld, O., & Jalife, J. (2000). Stable Microreentrant Sources as a Mechanism of Atrial Fibrillation in the Isolated Sheep Heart. Circulation, 101(2), 194-199. doi:10.1161/01.cir.101.2.194Narayan, S. M., Baykaner, T., Clopton, P., Schricker, A., Lalani, G. G., Krummen, D. E., … Miller, J. M. (2014). Ablation of Rotor and Focal Sources Reduces Late Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation Compared With Trigger Ablation Alone. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 63(17), 1761-1768. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.543NARAYAN, S. M., KRUMMEN, D. E., & RAPPEL, W.-J. (2012). Clinical Mapping Approach To Diagnose Electrical Rotors and Focal Impulse Sources for Human Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 23(5), 447-454. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8167.2012.02332.xNarayan, S. M., Krummen, D. E., Shivkumar, K., Clopton, P., Rappel, W.-J., & Miller, J. M. (2012). Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation by the Ablation of Localized Sources. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 60(7), 628-636. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.05.022Nattel, S. (2002). New ideas about atrial fibrillation 50 years on. Nature, 415(6868), 219-226. doi:10.1038/415219aNattel, S. (2003). Atrial Electrophysiology and Mechanisms of Atrial Fibrillation. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 8(1_suppl), S5-S11. doi:10.1177/107424840300800102Ortigosa, N., Fernández, C., Galbis, A., & Cano, Ó. (2015). Phase information of time-frequency transforms as a key feature for classification of atrial fibrillation episodes. Physiological Measurement, 36(3), 409-424. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/36/3/409Pandit, S. V., & Jalife, J. (2013). Rotors and the Dynamics of Cardiac Fibrillation. Circulation Research, 112(5), 849-862. doi:10.1161/circresaha.111.300158VII. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—III. Regression, heredity, and panmixia. (1896). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character, 187, 253-318. doi:10.1098/rsta.1896.0007Pertsov, A. M., Davidenko, J. M., Salomonsz, R., Baxter, W. T., & Jalife, J. (1993). Spiral waves of excitation underlie reentrant activity in isolated cardiac muscle. Circulation Research, 72(3), 631-650. doi:10.1161/01.res.72.3.631Podziemski, P., Zeemering, S., Kuklik, P., van Hunnik, A., Maesen, B., Maessen, J., … Schotten, U. (2018). Rotors Detected by Phase Analysis of Filtered, Epicardial Atrial Fibrillation Electrograms Colocalize With Regions of Conduction Block. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 11(10). doi:10.1161/circep.117.005858Wieser, L., Stühlinger, M. C., Hintringer, F., Tilg, B., Fischer, G., & Rantner, L. J. (2007). Detection of Phase Singularities in Triangular Meshes. Methods of Information in Medicine, 46(06), 646-654. doi:10.3414/me0427Ríos-Muñoz, G. R., Arenal, Á., & Artés-Rodríguez, A. (2018). Real-Time Rotational Activity Detection in Atrial Fibrillation. Frontiers in Physiology, 9. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.00208Rodrigo, M., Climent, A. M., Liberos, A., Fernández-Avilés, F., Berenfeld, O., Atienza, F., & Guillem, M. S. (2017). Technical Considerations on Phase Mapping for Identification of Atrial Reentrant Activity in Direct- and Inverse-Computed Electrograms. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 10(9). doi:10.1161/circep.117.005008Rodrigo, M., Guillem, M. S., Climent, A. M., Pedrón-Torrecilla, J., Liberos, A., Millet, J., … Berenfeld, O. (2014). Body surface localization of left and right atrial high-frequency rotors in atrial fibrillation patients: A clinical-computational study. Heart Rhythm, 11(9), 1584-1591. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.05.013Roney, C. H., Cantwell, C. D., Bayer, J. D., Qureshi, N. A., Lim, P. B., Tweedy, J. H., … Ng, F. S. (2017). Spatial Resolution Requirements for Accurate Identification of Drivers of Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 10(5). doi:10.1161/circep.116.004899Salinet, J., Schlindwein, F. S., Stafford, P., Almeida, T. P., Li, X., Vanheusden, F. J., … Ng, G. A. (2017). Propagation of meandering rotors surrounded by areas of high dominant frequency in persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 14(9), 1269-1278. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.031Salinet, J. L., Madeiro, J. P. V., Cortez, P. C., Stafford, P. J., André Ng, G., & Schlindwein, F. S. (2013). Analysis of QRS-T subtraction in unipolar atrial fibrillation electrograms. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 51(12), 1381-1391. doi:10.1007/s11517-013-1071-4Salinet, J. L., Oliveira, G. N., Vanheusden, F. J., Comba, J. L. D., Ng, G. A., & Schlindwein, F. S. (2013). Visualizing intracardiac atrial fibrillation electrograms using spectral analysis. Computing in Science & Engineering, 15(2), 79-87. doi:10.1109/mcse.2013.37Schilling, R. J., Peters, N. S., & Davies, D. W. (1998). Simultaneous Endocardial Mapping in the Human Left Ventricle Using a Noncontact Catheter. Circulation, 98(9), 887-898. doi:10.1161/01.cir.98.9.887Schricker, A. A., Lalani, G. G., Krummen, D. E., & Narayan, S. M. (2014). Rotors as Drivers of Atrial Fibrillation and Targets for Ablation. Current Cardiology Reports, 16(8). doi:10.1007/s11886-014-0509-0Steinberg, J. S., Shah, Y., Bhatt, A., Sichrovsky, T., Arshad, A., Hansinger, E., & Musat, D. (2017). Focal impulse and rotor modulation: Acute procedural observations and extended clinical follow-up. Heart Rhythm, 14(2), 192-197. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.11.008THIAGALINGAM, A., WALLACE, E. M., BOYD, A. C., EIPPER, V. E., CAMPBELL, C. R., BYTH, K., … KOVOOR, P. (2004). Noncontact Mapping of the Left Ventricle:. Insights from Validation with Transmural Contact Mapping. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 27(5), 570-578. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00489.xUmapathy, K., Nair, K., Masse, S., Krishnan, S., Rogers, J., Nash, M. P., & Nanthakumar, K. (2010). Phase Mapping of Cardiac Fibrillation. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 3(1), 105-114. doi:10.1161/circep.110.853804WITTKAMPF, F. H. M., & NAKAGAWA, H. (2006). RF Catheter Ablation: Lessons on Lesions. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 29(11), 1285-1297. doi:10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00533.xWang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004). Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600-612. doi:10.1109/tip.2003.81986

Basket-Type Catheters : Diagnostic Pitfalls Caused by Deformation and Limited Coverage

Whole-chamber mapping using a 64-pole basket catheter (BC) has become a featured approach for the analysis of excitation patterns during atrial fibrillation. A flexible catheter design avoids perforation but may lead to spline bunching and influence coverage. We aim to quantify the catheter deformation and endocardial coverage in clinical situations and study the effect of catheter size and electrode arrangement using an in silico basket model. Atrial coverage and spline separation were evaluated quantitatively in an ensemble of clinical measurements. A computational model of the BC was implemented including an algorithm to adapt its shape to the atrial anatomy. Two clinically relevant mapping positions in each atrium were assessed in both clinical and simulated data. The simulation environment allowed varying both BC size and electrode arrangement. Results showed that interspline distances of more than 20 mm are common, leading to a coverage of less than 50% of the left atrial (LA) surface. In an ideal in silico scenario with variable catheter designs, a maximum coverage of 65% could be reached. As spline bunching and insufficient coverage can hardly be avoided, this has to be taken into account for interpretation of excitation patterns and development of new panoramic mapping techniques

Directed networks as a novel way to describe and analyze cardiac excitation : directed graph mapping

Networks provide a powerful methodology with applications in a variety of biological, technological and social systems such as analysis of brain data, social networks, internet search engine algorithms, etc. To date, directed networks have not yet been applied to characterize the excitation of the human heart. In clinical practice, cardiac excitation is recorded by multiple discrete electrodes. During (normal) sinus rhythm or during cardiac arrhythmias, successive excitation connects neighboring electrodes, resulting in their own unique directed network. This in theory makes it a perfect fit for directed network analysis. In this study, we applied directed networks to the heart in order to describe and characterize cardiac arrhythmias. Proof-of-principle was established using in-silico and clinical data. We demonstrated that tools used in network theory analysis allow determination of the mechanism and location of certain cardiac arrhythmias. We show that the robustness of this approach can potentially exceed the existing state-of-the art methodology used in clinics. Furthermore, implementation of these techniques in daily practice can improve the accuracy and speed of cardiac arrhythmia analysis. It may also provide novel insights in arrhythmias that are still incompletely understood