Cycle-accurate evaluation of reconfigurable photonic networks-on-chip

There is little doubt that the most important limiting factors of the performance of next-generation Chip Multiprocessors (CMPs) will be the power efficiency and the available communication speed between cores. Photonic Networks-on-Chip (NoCs) have been suggested as a viable route to relieve the off- and on-chip interconnection bottleneck. Low-loss integrated optical waveguides can transport very high-speed data signals over longer distances as compared to on-chip electrical signaling. In addition, with the development of silicon microrings, photonic switches can be integrated to route signals in a data-transparent way. Although several photonic NoC proposals exist, their use is often limited to the communication of large data messages due to a relatively long set-up time of the photonic channels. In this work, we evaluate a reconfigurable photonic NoC in which the topology is adapted automatically (on a microsecond scale) to the evolving traffic situation by use of silicon microrings. To evaluate this system's performance, the proposed architecture has been implemented in a detailed full-system cycle-accurate simulator which is capable of generating realistic workloads and traffic patterns. In addition, a model was developed to estimate the power consumption of the full interconnection network which was compared with other photonic and electrical NoC solutions. We find that our proposed network architecture significantly lowers the average memory access latency (35% reduction) while only generating a modest increase in power consumption (20%), compared to a conventional concentrated mesh electrical signaling approach. When comparing our solution to high-speed circuit-switched photonic NoCs, long photonic channel set-up times can be tolerated which makes our approach directly applicable to current shared-memory CMPs

Characterization of real-time computers

A real-time system consists of a computer controller and controlled processes. Despite the synergistic relationship between these two components, they have been traditionally designed and analyzed independently of and separately from each other; namely, computer controllers by computer scientists/engineers and controlled processes by control scientists. As a remedy for this problem, in this report real-time computers are characterized by performance measures based on computer controller response time that are: (1) congruent to the real-time applications, (2) able to offer an objective comparison of rival computer systems, and (3) experimentally measurable/determinable. These measures, unlike others, provide the real-time computer controller with a natural link to controlled processes. In order to demonstrate their utility and power, these measures are first determined for example controlled processes on the basis of control performance functionals. They are then used for two important real-time multiprocessor design applications - the number-power tradeoff and fault-masking and synchronization

Exploiting the HTX-Board as a Coprocessor for Exact Arithmetics

Certain numerical computations benefit from dedicated computation units, e.g. providing increased computation accuracy. Exploiting current interconnection technologies and advances in reconfigurable logic, restrictions and drawbacks of past approaches towards application-specific units can be overcome. This paper presents our implementation of an FPGA-based hardware unit for exact arithmetics. The unit is tightly integrated into the host system using state-of-the-art HyperTransport technology. An according runtime system provides OS-level support including dynamic function resolution. The approach demonstrates suitability and applicability of the chosen technologies, setting the pace towards broadly acceptable use of reconfigurable coprocessor technology for application-specific computing

Principles, fundamentals, and applications of programmable integrated photonics

[EN] Programmable integrated photonics is an emerging new paradigm that aims at designing common integrated optical hardware resource configurations, capable of implementing an unconstrained variety of functionalities by suitable programming, following a parallel but not identical path to that of integrated electronics in the past two decades of the last century. Programmable integrated photonics is raising considerable interest, as it is driven by the surge of a considerable number of new applications in the fields of telecommunications, quantum information processing, sensing, and neurophotonics, calling for flexible, reconfigurable, low-cost, compact, and low-power-consuming devices that can cooperate with integrated electronic devices to overcome the limitation expected by the demise of Moore¿s Law. Integrated photonic devices exploiting full programmability are expected to scale from application-specific photonic chips (featuring a relatively low number of functionalities) up to very complex application-agnostic complex subsystems much in the same way as field programmable gate arrays and microprocessors operate in electronics. Two main differences need to be considered. First, as opposed to integrated electronics, programmable integrated photonics will carry analog operations over the signals to be processed. Second, the scale of integration density will be several orders of magnitude smaller due to the physical limitations imposed by the wavelength ratio of electrons and light wave photons. The success of programmable integrated photonics will depend on leveraging the properties of integrated photonic devices and, in particular, on research into suitable interconnection hardware architectures that can offer a very high spatial regularity as well as the possibility of independently setting (with a very low power consumption) the interconnection state of each connecting element. Integrated multiport interferometers and waveguide meshes provide regular and periodic geometries, formed by replicating unit elements and cells, respectively. In the case of waveguide meshes, the cells can take the form of a square, hexagon, or triangle, among other configurations. Each side of the cell is formed by two integrated waveguides connected by means of a Mach¿Zehnder interferometer or a tunable directional coupler that can be operated by means of an output control signal as a crossbar switch or as a variable coupler with independent power division ratio and phase shift. In this paper, we provide the basic foundations and principles behind the construction of these complex programmable circuits. We also review some practical aspects that limit the programming and scalability of programmable integrated photonics and provide an overview of some of the most salient applications demonstrated so far.European Research Council; Conselleria d'Educació, Investigació, Cultura i Esport; Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades; European Cooperation in Science and Technology; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme.Pérez-López, D.; Gasulla Mestre, I.; Dasmahapatra, P.; Capmany Francoy, J. (2020). Principles, fundamentals, and applications of programmable integrated photonics. Advances in Optics and Photonics. 12(3):709-786. https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.387155709786123Lyke, J. C., Christodoulou, C. G., Vera, G. A., & Edwards, A. H. (2015). An Introduction to Reconfigurable Systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(3), 291-317. doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2397832Kaeslin, H. (2008). Digital Integrated Circuit Design. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511805172Trimberger, S. M. (2015). Three Ages of FPGAs: A Retrospective on the First Thirty Years of FPGA Technology. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(3), 318-331. doi:10.1109/jproc.2015.2392104Mitola, J. (1995). The software radio architecture. IEEE Communications Magazine, 33(5), 26-38. doi:10.1109/35.393001Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014). A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1617-1634. doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00180Papagianni, C., Leivadeas, A., Papavassiliou, S., Maglaris, V., Cervello-Pastor, C., & Monje, A. (2013). On the optimal allocation of virtual resources in cloud computing networks. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 62(6), 1060-1071. doi:10.1109/tc.2013.31Peruzzo, A., Laing, A., Politi, A., Rudolph, T., & O’Brien, J. L. (2011). Multimode quantum interference of photons in multiport integrated devices. Nature Communications, 2(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms1228Metcalf, B. J., Thomas-Peter, N., Spring, J. B., Kundys, D., Broome, M. A., Humphreys, P. C., … Walmsley, I. A. (2013). Multiphoton quantum interference in a multiport integrated photonic device. Nature Communications, 4(1). doi:10.1038/ncomms2349Miller, D. A. B. (2013). Self-aligning universal beam coupler. Optics Express, 21(5), 6360. doi:10.1364/oe.21.006360Miller, D. A. B. (2013). Self-configuring universal linear optical component [Invited]. Photonics Research, 1(1), 1. doi:10.1364/prj.1.000001Carolan, J., Harrold, C., Sparrow, C., Martín-López, E., Russell, N. J., Silverstone, J. W., … Laing, A. (2015). Universal linear optics. Science, 349(6249), 711-716. doi:10.1126/science.aab3642Harris, N. C., Steinbrecher, G. R., Prabhu, M., Lahini, Y., Mower, J., Bunandar, D., … Englund, D. (2017). Quantum transport simulations in a programmable nanophotonic processor. Nature Photonics, 11(7), 447-452. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.95Birth of the programmable optical chip. (2015). Nature Photonics, 10(1), 1-1. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.265Zhuang, L., Roeloffzen, C. G. H., Hoekman, M., Boller, K.-J., & Lowery, A. J. (2015). Programmable photonic signal processor chip for radiofrequency applications. Optica, 2(10), 854. doi:10.1364/optica.2.000854Pérez, D., Gasulla, I., Capmany, J., & Soref, R. A. (2016). Reconfigurable lattice mesh designs for programmable photonic processors. Optics Express, 24(11), 12093. doi:10.1364/oe.24.012093Capmany, J., Gasulla, I., & Pérez, D. (2015). The programmable processor. Nature Photonics, 10(1), 6-8. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.254Pérez, D., Gasulla, I., Crudgington, L., Thomson, D. J., Khokhar, A. Z., Li, K., … Capmany, J. (2017). Multipurpose silicon photonics signal processor core. Nature Communications, 8(1). doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00714-1Clements, W. R., Humphreys, P. C., Metcalf, B. J., Kolthammer, W. S., & Walsmley, I. A. (2016). Optimal design for universal multiport interferometers. Optica, 3(12), 1460. doi:10.1364/optica.3.001460Perez, D., Gasulla, I., Fraile, F. J., Crudgington, L., Thomson, D. J., Khokhar, A. Z., … Capmany, J. (2017). Silicon Photonics Rectangular Universal Interferometer. Laser & Photonics Reviews, 11(6), 1700219. doi:10.1002/lpor.201700219Shen, Y., Harris, N. C., Skirlo, S., Prabhu, M., Baehr-Jones, T., Hochberg, M., … Soljačić, M. (2017). Deep learning with coherent nanophotonic circuits. Nature Photonics, 11(7), 441-446. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.93Ribeiro, A., Ruocco, A., Vanacker, L., & Bogaerts, W. (2016). Demonstration of a 4 × 4-port universal linear circuit. Optica, 3(12), 1348. doi:10.1364/optica.3.001348Annoni, A., Guglielmi, E., Carminati, M., Ferrari, G., Sampietro, M., Miller, D. A., … Morichetti, F. (2017). Unscrambling light—automatically undoing strong mixing between modes. Light: Science & Applications, 6(12), e17110-e17110. doi:10.1038/lsa.2017.110Perez, D., Gasulla, I., & Capmany, J. (2018). Toward Programmable Microwave Photonics Processors. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(2), 519-532. doi:10.1109/jlt.2017.2778741Chen, L., Hall, E., Theogarajan, L., & Bowers, J. (2011). Photonic Switching for Data Center Applications. IEEE Photonics Journal, 3(5), 834-844. doi:10.1109/jphot.2011.2166994Miller, D. A. B. (2017). Meshing optics with applications. Nature Photonics, 11(7), 403-404. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2017.104Thomas-Peter, N., Langford, N. K., Datta, A., Zhang, L., Smith, B. J., Spring, J. B., … Walmsley, I. A. (2011). Integrated photonic sensing. New Journal of Physics, 13(5), 055024. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/5/055024Smit, M., Leijtens, X., Ambrosius, H., Bente, E., van der Tol, J., Smalbrugge, B., … van Veldhoven, R. (2014). An introduction to InP-based generic integration technology. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 29(8), 083001. doi:10.1088/0268-1242/29/8/083001Coldren, L. A., Nicholes, S. C., Johansson, L., Ristic, S., Guzzon, R. S., Norberg, E. J., & Krishnamachari, U. (2011). High Performance InP-Based Photonic ICs—A Tutorial. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 29(4), 554-570. doi:10.1109/jlt.2010.2100807Kish, F., Nagarajan, R., Welch, D., Evans, P., Rossi, J., Pleumeekers, J., … Joyner, C. (2013). From Visible Light-Emitting Diodes to Large-Scale III–V Photonic Integrated Circuits. Proceedings of the IEEE, 101(10), 2255-2270. doi:10.1109/jproc.2013.2275018Hochberg, M., & Baehr-Jones, T. (2010). Towards fabless silicon photonics. Nature Photonics, 4(8), 492-494. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.172Bogaerts, W., Fiers, M., & Dumon, P. (2014). Design Challenges in Silicon Photonics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 20(4), 1-8. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2013.2295882Soref, R. (2006). The Past, Present, and Future of Silicon Photonics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 12(6), 1678-1687. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2006.883151Chrostowski, L., & Hochberg, M. (2015). Silicon Photonics Design. doi:10.1017/cbo9781316084168Heck, M. J. R., Bauters, J. F., Davenport, M. L., Doylend, J. K., Jain, S., Kurczveil, G., … Bowers, J. E. (2013). Hybrid Silicon Photonic Integrated Circuit Technology. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 19(4), 6100117-6100117. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2012.2235413Keyvaninia, S., Muneeb, M., Stanković, S., Van Veldhoven, P. J., Van Thourhout, D., & Roelkens, G. (2012). Ultra-thin DVS-BCB adhesive bonding of III-V wafers, dies and multiple dies to a patterned silicon-on-insulator substrate. Optical Materials Express, 3(1), 35. doi:10.1364/ome.3.000035Heideman, R., Hoekman, M., & Schreuder, E. (2012). TriPleX-Based Integrated Optical Ring Resonators for Lab-on-a-Chip and Environmental Detection. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 18(5), 1583-1596. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2012.2188382Roeloffzen, C. G. H., Zhuang, L., Taddei, C., Leinse, A., Heideman, R. G., van Dijk, P. W. L., … Boller, K.-J. (2013). Silicon nitride microwave photonic circuits. Optics Express, 21(19), 22937. doi:10.1364/oe.21.022937Corbett, B., Loi, R., Zhou, W., Liu, D., & Ma, Z. (2017). Transfer print techniques for heterogeneous integration of photonic components. Progress in Quantum Electronics, 52, 1-17. doi:10.1016/j.pquantelec.2017.01.001Van der Tol, J. J. G. M., Jiao, Y., Shen, L., Millan-Mejia, A., Pogoretskii, V., van Engelen, J. P., & Smit, M. K. (2018). Indium Phosphide Integrated Photonics in Membranes. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 24(1), 1-9. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2017.2772786Bachmann, M., Besse, P. A., & Melchior, H. (1994). General self-imaging properties in N × N multimode interference couplers including phase relations. Applied Optics, 33(18), 3905. doi:10.1364/ao.33.003905Soldano, L. B., & Pennings, E. C. M. (1995). Optical multi-mode interference devices based on self-imaging: principles and applications. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 13(4), 615-627. doi:10.1109/50.372474Madsen, C. K., & Zhao, J. H. (1999). Optical Filter Design and Analysis. Wiley Series in Microwave and Optical Engineering. doi:10.1002/0471213756Desurvire, E. (2009). Classical and Quantum Information Theory. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803758Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001). A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature, 409(6816), 46-52. doi:10.1038/35051009Capmany, J., & Pérez, D. (2020). Programmable Integrated Photonics. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844402.001.0001Spagnolo, N., Vitelli, C., Bentivegna, M., Brod, D. J., Crespi, A., Flamini, F., … Sciarrino, F. (2014). Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling. Nature Photonics, 8(8), 615-620. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2014.135Mennea, P. L., Clements, W. R., Smith, D. H., Gates, J. C., Metcalf, B. J., Bannerman, R. H. S., … Smith, P. G. R. (2018). Modular linear optical circuits. Optica, 5(9), 1087. doi:10.1364/optica.5.001087Perez-Lopez, D., Sanchez, E., & Capmany, J. (2018). Programmable True Time Delay Lines Using Integrated Waveguide Meshes. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(19), 4591-4601. doi:10.1109/jlt.2018.2831008Pérez-López, D., Gutierrez, A. M., Sánchez, E., DasMahapatra, P., & Capmany, J. (2019). Integrated photonic tunable basic units using dual-drive directional couplers. Optics Express, 27(26), 38071. doi:10.1364/oe.27.038071Jinguji, K., & Kawachi, M. (1995). Synthesis of coherent two-port lattice-form optical delay-line circuit. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 13(1), 73-82. doi:10.1109/50.350643Mookherjea, S., & Yariv, A. (2002). Coupled resonator optical waveguides. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 8(3), 448-456. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2002.1016347Heebner, J. E., Chak, P., Pereira, S., Sipe, J. E., & Boyd, R. W. (2004). Distributed and localized feedback in microresonator sequences for linear and nonlinear optics. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 21(10), 1818. doi:10.1364/josab.21.001818Fandiño, J. S., Muñoz, P., Doménech, D., & Capmany, J. (2016). A monolithic integrated photonic microwave filter. Nature Photonics, 11(2), 124-129. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.233Miller, D. A. B. (2012). All linear optical devices are mode converters. Optics Express, 20(21), 23985. doi:10.1364/oe.20.023985Brown, S. D., Francis, R. J., Rose, J., & Vranesic, Z. G. (1992). Field-Programmable Gate Arrays. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-3572-0Lee, E. K. F., & Gulak, P. G. (1992). Field programmable analogue array based on MOSFET transconductors. Electronics Letters, 28(1), 28-29. doi:10.1049/el:19920017Lee, E. K. F., & Gulak, P. G. (s. f.). A transconductor-based field-programmable analog array. Proceedings ISSCC ’95 - International Solid-State Circuits Conference. doi:10.1109/isscc.1995.535521Pérez, D., Gasulla, I., & Capmany, J. (2018). Field-programmable photonic arrays. Optics Express, 26(21), 27265. doi:10.1364/oe.26.027265Zheng, D., Doménech, J. D., Pan, W., Zou, X., Yan, L., & Pérez, D. (2019). Low-loss broadband 5  ×  5 non-blocking Si3N4 optical switch matrix. Optics Letters, 44(11), 2629. doi:10.1364/ol.44.002629Densmore, A., Janz, S., Ma, R., Schmid, J. H., Xu, D.-X., Delâge, A., … Cheben, P. (2009). Compact and low power thermo-optic switch using folded silicon waveguides. Optics Express, 17(13), 10457. doi:10.1364/oe.17.010457Song, M., Long, C. M., Wu, R., Seo, D., Leaird, D. E., & Weiner, A. M. (2011). Reconfigurable and Tunable Flat-Top Microwave Photonic Filters Utilizing Optical Frequency Combs. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 23(21), 1618-1620. doi:10.1109/lpt.2011.2165209Rudé, M., Pello, J., Simpson, R. E., Osmond, J., Roelkens, G., van der Tol, J. J. G. M., & Pruneri, V. (2013). Optical switching at 1.55 μm in silicon racetrack resonators using phase change materials. Applied Physics Letters, 103(14), 141119. doi:10.1063/1.4824714Zheng, J., Khanolkar, A., Xu, P., Colburn, S., Deshmukh, S., Myers, J., … Majumdar, A. (2018). GST-on-silicon hybrid nanophotonic integrated circuits: a non-volatile quasi-continuously reprogrammable platform. Optical Materials Express, 8(6), 1551. doi:10.1364/ome.8.001551Edinger, P., Errando-Herranz, C., & Gylfason, K. B. (2019). Low-Loss MEMS Phase Shifter for Large Scale Reconfigurable Silicon Photonics. 2019 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). doi:10.1109/memsys.2019.8870616Carroll, L., Lee, J.-S., Scarcella, C., Gradkowski, K., Duperron, M., Lu, H., … O’Brien, P. (2016). Photonic Packaging: Transforming Silicon Photonic Integrated Circuits into Photonic Devices. Applied Sciences, 6(12), 426. doi:10.3390/app6120426Bahadori, M., Gazman, A., Janosik, N., Rumley, S., Zhu, Z., Polster, R., … Bergman, K. (2018). Thermal Rectification of Integrated Microheaters for Microring Resonators in Silicon Photonics Platform. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 36(3), 773-788. doi:10.1109/jlt.2017.2781131Cocorullo, G., Della Corte, F. G., Rendina, I., & Sarro, P. M. (1998). Thermo-optic effect exploitation in silicon microstructures. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 71(1-2), 19-26. doi:10.1016/s0924-4247(98)00168-xZecevic, N., Hofbauer, M., & Zimmermann, H. (2015). Integrated Pulsewidth Modulation Control for a Scalable Optical Switch Matrix. IEEE Photonics Journal, 7(6), 1-7. doi:10.1109/jphot.2015.2506153Seok, T. J., Quack, N., Han, S., & Wu, M. C. (2015). 50×50 Digital Silicon Photonic Switches with MEMS-Actuated Adiabatic Couplers. Optical Fiber Communication Conference. doi:10.1364/ofc.2015.m2b.4Zortman, W. A., Trotter, D. C., & Watts, M. R. (2010). Silicon photonics manufacturing. Optics Express, 18(23), 23598. doi:10.1364/oe.18.023598Mower, J., Harris, N. C., Steinbrecher, G. R., Lahini, Y., & Englund, D. (2015). High-fidelity quantum state evolution in imperfect photonic integrated circuits. Physical Review A, 92(3). doi:10.1103/physreva.92.032322Pérez, D., & Capmany, J. (2019). Scalable analysis for arbitrary photonic integrated waveguide meshes. Optica, 6(1), 19. doi:10.1364/optica.6.000019Oton, C. J., Manganelli, C., Bontempi, F., Fournier, M., Fowler, D., & Kopp, C. (2016). Silicon photonic waveguide metrology using Mach-Zehnder interferometers. Optics Express, 24(6), 6265. doi:10.1364/oe.24.006265Chen, X., & Bogaerts, W. (2019). A Graph-based Design and Programming Strategy for Reconfigurable Photonic Circuits. 2019 IEEE Photonics Society Summer Topical Meeting Series (SUM). doi:10.1109/phosst.2019.8795068Zibar, D., Wymeersch, H., & Lyubomirsky, I. (2017). Machine learning under the spotlight. Nature Photonics, 11(12), 749-751. doi:10.1038/s41566-017-0058-3Lopez, D. P. (2020). Programmable Integrated Silicon Photonics Waveguide Meshes: Optimized Designs and Control Algorithms. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 26(2), 1-12. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2019.2948048Harris, N. C., Bunandar, D., Pant, M., Steinbrecher, G. R., Mower, J., Prabhu, M., … Englund, D. (2016). Large-scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon. Nanophotonics, 5(3), 456-468. doi:10.1515/nanoph-2015-0146Spring, J. B., Metcalf, B. J., Humphreys, P. C., Kolthammer, W. S., Jin, X.-M., Barbieri, M., … Walmsley, I. A. (2012). Boson Sampling on a Photonic Chip. Science, 339(6121), 798-801. doi:10.1126/science.1231692O’Brien, J. L., Furusawa, A., & Vučković, J. (2009). Photonic quantum technologies. Nature Photonics, 3(12), 687-695. doi:10.1038/nphoton.2009.229Kok, P., Munro, W. J., Nemoto, K., Ralph, T. C., Dowling, J. P., & Milburn, G. J. (2007). Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Reviews of Modern Physics, 79(1), 135-174. doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.135Politi, A., Cryan, M. J., Rarity, J. G., Yu, S., & O’Brien, J. L. (2008). Silica-on-Silicon Waveguide Quantum Circuits. Science, 320(5876), 646-649. doi:10.1126/science.1155441Politi, A., Matthews, J., Thompson, M. G., & O’Brien, J. L. (2009). Integrated Quantum Photonics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 15(6), 1673-1684. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2009.2026060Thompson, M. G., Politi, A., Matthews, J. C. F., & O’Brien, J. L. (2011). Integrated waveguide circuits for optical quantum computing. IET Circuits, Devices & Systems, 5(2), 94. doi:10.1049/iet-cds.2010.0108Silverstone, J. W., Bonneau, D., O’Brien, J. L., & Thompson, M. G. (2016). Silicon Quantum Photonics. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, 22(6), 390-402. doi:10.1109/jstqe.2016.2573218Poot, M., Schuck, C., Ma, X., Guo, X., & Tang, H. X. (2016). Design and characterization of integrated components for SiN photonic quantum circuits. Optics Express, 24(7), 6843. doi:10.1364/oe.24.006843Saleh, M. F., Di Giuseppe, G., Saleh, B. E. A., & Teich, M. C. (2010). Modal and polarization qubits in Ti:LiNbO_3 photonic circuits for a universal quantum logic gate. Optics Express, 18(19), 20475. doi:10.1364/oe.18.020475Harris, N. C., Carolan, J., Bunandar, D., Prabhu, M., Hochberg, M., Baehr-Jones, T., … Englund, D. (2018). Linear programmable nanophotonic processors. Optica, 5(12), 1623. doi:10.1364/optica.5.001623Qiang, X., Zhou, X., Wang, J., Wilkes, C. M., Loke, T., O’Gara, S., … Matthews, J. C. F. (2018). Large-scale silicon quantum photonics implementing arbitrary two-qubit processing. Nature Photonics, 12(9), 534-539. doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0236-yLee, B. G., & Dupuis, N. (2019). Silicon Photonic Switch Fabrics: Technology and Architecture. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 37(1), 6-20. doi:10.1109/jlt.2018.2876828Cheng, Q., Rumley, S., Bahadori, M., & Bergman, K. (2018). Photonic switching in high performance datacenters [Invited]. Optics Express, 26(12), 16022. doi:10.1364/oe.26.016022Wonfor, A., Wang, H., Penty, R. V., & White, I. H. (2011). Large Port Count High-Speed Optical Switch Fabric for Use Within Datacenters [Invited]. Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, 3(8), A32. doi:10.1364/jocn.3.000a32Hamamoto, K., Anan, T., Komatsu, K., Sugimoto, M., & Mito, I. (1992). First 8×8 semiconductor optical matrix switches using GaAs/AlGaAs electro-optic guided-wave directional couplers. Electronics Letters, 28(5), 441. doi:10.1049/el:19920278Van Campenhout, J., Green, W. M., Assefa, S., & Vlasov, Y. A. (2009). Low-power, 2×2 silicon electro-optic switch with 110-nm bandwidth for broadband reconfigurable optical networks. Optics Express, 17(26), 24020. doi:10.1364/oe.17.024020Dupuis, N., Lee, B. G., Rylyakov, A. V., Kuchta, D. M., Baks, C. W., Orcutt, J. S., … Schow, C. L. (2015). D

Cross-Layer Rapid Prototyping and Synthesis of Application-Specific and Reconfigurable Many-accelerator Platforms

Technological advances of recent years laid the foundation consolidation of informatisationof society, impacting on economic, political, cultural and socialdimensions. At the peak of this realization, today, more and more everydaydevices are connected to the web, giving the term ”Internet of Things”. The futureholds the full connection and interaction of IT and communications systemsto the natural world, delimiting the transition to natural cyber systems and offeringmeta-services in the physical world, such as personalized medical care, autonomoustransportation, smart energy cities etc. . Outlining the necessities of this dynamicallyevolving market, computer engineers are required to implement computingplatforms that incorporate both increased systemic complexity and also cover awide range of meta-characteristics, such as the cost and design time, reliabilityand reuse, which are prescribed by a conflicting set of functional, technical andconstruction constraints. This thesis aims to address these design challenges bydeveloping methodologies and hardware/software co-design tools that enable therapid implementation and efficient synthesis of architectural solutions, which specifyoperating meta-features required by the modern market. Specifically, this thesispresents a) methodologies to accelerate the design flow for both reconfigurableand application-specific architectures, b) coarse-grain heterogeneous architecturaltemplates for processing and communication acceleration and c) efficient multiobjectivesynthesis techniques both at high abstraction level of programming andphysical silicon level.Regarding to the acceleration of the design flow, the proposed methodologyemploys virtual platforms in order to hide architectural details and drastically reducesimulation time. An extension of this framework introduces the systemicco-simulation using reconfigurable acceleration platforms as co-emulation intermediateplatforms. Thus, the development cycle of a hardware/software productis accelerated by moving from a vertical serial flow to a circular interactive loop.Moreover the simulation capabilities are enriched with efficient detection and correctiontechniques of design errors, as well as control methods of performancemetrics of the system according to the desired specifications, during all phasesof the system development. In orthogonal correlation with the aforementionedmethodological framework, a new architectural template is proposed, aiming atbridging the gap between design complexity and technological productivity usingspecialized hardware accelerators in heterogeneous systems-on-chip and networkon-chip platforms. It is presented a novel co-design methodology for the hardwareaccelerators and their respective programming software, including the tasks allocationto the available resources of the system/network. The introduced frameworkprovides implementation techniques for the accelerators, using either conventionalprogramming flows with hardware description language or abstract programmingmodel flows, using techniques from high-level synthesis. In any case, it is providedthe option of systemic measures optimization, such as the processing speed,the throughput, the reliability, the power consumption and the design silicon area.Finally, on addressing the increased complexity in design tools of reconfigurablesystems, there are proposed novel multi-objective optimization evolutionary algo-rithms which exploit the modern multicore processors and the coarse-grain natureof multithreaded programming environments (e.g. OpenMP) in order to reduce theplacement time, while by simultaneously grouping the applications based on theirintrinsic characteristics, the effectively explore the design space effectively.The efficiency of the proposed architectural templates, design tools and methodologyflows is evaluated in relation to the existing edge solutions with applicationsfrom typical computing domains, such as digital signal processing, multimedia andarithmetic complexity, as well as from systemic heterogeneous environments, suchas a computer vision system for autonomous robotic space navigation and manyacceleratorsystems for HPC and workstations/datacenters. The results strengthenthe belief of the author, that this thesis provides competitive expertise to addresscomplex modern - and projected future - design challenges.Οι τεχνολογικές εξελίξεις των τελευταίων ετών έθεσαν τα θεμέλια εδραίωσης της πληροφοριοποίησης της κοινωνίας, επιδρώντας σε οικονομικές,πολιτικές, πολιτιστικές και κοινωνικές διαστάσεις. Στο απόγειο αυτής τη ςπραγμάτωσης, σήμερα, ολοένα και περισσότερες καθημερινές συσκευές συνδέονται στο παγκόσμιο ιστό, αποδίδοντας τον όρο «Ίντερνετ των πραγμάτων».Το μέλλον επιφυλάσσει την πλήρη σύνδεση και αλληλεπίδραση των συστημάτων πληροφορικής και επικοινωνιών με τον φυσικό κόσμο, οριοθετώντας τη μετάβαση στα συστήματα φυσικού κυβερνοχώρου και προσφέροντας μεταυπηρεσίες στον φυσικό κόσμο όπως προσωποποιημένη ιατρική περίθαλψη, αυτόνομες μετακινήσεις, έξυπνες ενεργειακά πόλεις κ.α. . Σκιαγραφώντας τις ανάγκες αυτής της δυναμικά εξελισσόμενης αγοράς, οι μηχανικοί υπολογιστών καλούνται να υλοποιήσουν υπολογιστικές πλατφόρμες που αφενός ενσωματώνουν αυξημένη συστημική πολυπλοκότητα και αφετέρου καλύπτουν ένα ευρύ φάσμα μεταχαρακτηριστικών, όπως λ.χ. το κόστος σχεδιασμού, ο χρόνος σχεδιασμού, η αξιοπιστία και η επαναχρησιμοποίηση, τα οποία προδιαγράφονται από ένα αντικρουόμενο σύνολο λειτουργικών, τεχνολογικών και κατασκευαστικών περιορισμών. Η παρούσα διατριβή στοχεύει στην αντιμετώπιση των παραπάνω σχεδιαστικών προκλήσεων, μέσω της ανάπτυξης μεθοδολογιών και εργαλείων συνσχεδίασης υλικού/λογισμικού που επιτρέπουν την ταχεία υλοποίηση καθώς και την αποδοτική σύνθεση αρχιτεκτονικών λύσεων, οι οποίες προδιαγράφουν τα μετα-χαρακτηριστικά λειτουργίας που απαιτεί η σύγχρονη αγορά. Συγκεκριμένα, στα πλαίσια αυτής της διατριβής, παρουσιάζονται α) μεθοδολογίες επιτάχυνσης της ροής σχεδιασμού τόσο για επαναδιαμορφούμενες όσο και για εξειδικευμένες αρχιτεκτονικές, β) ετερογενή αδρομερή αρχιτεκτονικά πρότυπα επιτάχυνσης επεξεργασίας και επικοινωνίας και γ) αποδοτικές τεχνικές πολυκριτηριακής σύνθεσης τόσο σε υψηλό αφαιρετικό επίπεδο προγραμματισμού,όσο και σε φυσικό επίπεδο πυριτίου.Αναφορικά προς την επιτάχυνση της ροής σχεδιασμού, προτείνεται μια μεθοδολογία που χρησιμοποιεί εικονικές πλατφόρμες, οι οποίες αφαιρώντας τις αρχιτεκτονικές λεπτομέρειες καταφέρνουν να μειώσουν σημαντικά το χρόνο εξομοίωσης. Παράλληλα, εισηγείται η συστημική συν-εξομοίωση με τη χρήση επαναδιαμορφούμενων πλατφορμών, ως μέσων επιτάχυνσης. Με αυτόν τον τρόπο, ο κύκλος ανάπτυξης ενός προϊόντος υλικού, μετατεθειμένος από την κάθετη σειριακή ροή σε έναν κυκλικό αλληλεπιδραστικό βρόγχο, καθίσταται ταχύτερος, ενώ οι δυνατότητες προσομοίωσης εμπλουτίζονται με αποδοτικότερες μεθόδους εντοπισμού και διόρθωσης σχεδιαστικών σφαλμάτων, καθώς και μεθόδους ελέγχου των μετρικών απόδοσης του συστήματος σε σχέση με τις επιθυμητές προδιαγραφές, σε όλες τις φάσεις ανάπτυξης του συστήματος. Σε ορθογώνια συνάφεια με το προαναφερθέν μεθοδολογικό πλαίσιο, προτείνονται νέα αρχιτεκτονικά πρότυπα που στοχεύουν στη γεφύρωση του χάσματος μεταξύ της σχεδιαστικής πολυπλοκότητας και της τεχνολογικής παραγωγικότητας, με τη χρήση συστημάτων εξειδικευμένων επιταχυντών υλικού σε ετερογενή συστήματα-σε-ψηφίδα καθώς και δίκτυα-σε-ψηφίδα. Παρουσιάζεται κατάλληλη μεθοδολογία συν-σχεδίασης των επιταχυντών υλικού και του λογισμικού προκειμένου να αποφασισθεί η κατανομή των εργασιών στους διαθέσιμους πόρους του συστήματος/δικτύου. Το μεθοδολογικό πλαίσιο προβλέπει την υλοποίηση των επιταχυντών είτε με συμβατικές μεθόδους προγραμματισμού σε γλώσσα περιγραφής υλικού είτε με αφαιρετικό προγραμματιστικό μοντέλο με τη χρήση τεχνικών υψηλού επιπέδου σύνθεσης. Σε κάθε περίπτωση, δίδεται η δυνατότητα στο σχεδιαστή για βελτιστοποίηση συστημικών μετρικών, όπως η ταχύτητα επεξεργασίας, η ρυθμαπόδοση, η αξιοπιστία, η κατανάλωση ενέργειας και η επιφάνεια πυριτίου του σχεδιασμού. Τέλος, προκειμένου να αντιμετωπισθεί η αυξημένη πολυπλοκότητα στα σχεδιαστικά εργαλεία επαναδιαμορφούμενων συστημάτων, προτείνονται νέοι εξελικτικοί αλγόριθμοι πολυκριτηριακής βελτιστοποίησης, οι οποίοι εκμεταλλευόμενοι τους σύγχρονους πολυπύρηνους επεξεργαστές και την αδρομερή φύση των πολυνηματικών περιβαλλόντων προγραμματισμού (π.χ. OpenMP), μειώνουν το χρόνο επίλυσης του προβλήματος της τοποθέτησης των λογικών πόρων σε φυσικούς,ενώ ταυτόχρονα, ομαδοποιώντας τις εφαρμογές βάση των εγγενών χαρακτηριστικών τους, διερευνούν αποτελεσματικότερα το χώρο σχεδίασης.Η αποδοτικότητά των προτεινόμενων αρχιτεκτονικών προτύπων και μεθοδολογιών επαληθεύτηκε σε σχέση με τις υφιστάμενες λύσεις αιχμής τόσο σε αυτοτελής εφαρμογές, όπως η ψηφιακή επεξεργασία σήματος, τα πολυμέσα και τα προβλήματα αριθμητικής πολυπλοκότητας, καθώς και σε συστημικά ετερογενή περιβάλλοντα, όπως ένα σύστημα όρασης υπολογιστών για αυτόνομα διαστημικά ρομποτικά οχήματα και ένα σύστημα πολλαπλών επιταχυντών υλικού για σταθμούς εργασίας και κέντρα δεδομένων, στοχεύοντας εφαρμογές υψηλής υπολογιστικής απόδοσης (HPC). Τα αποτελέσματα ενισχύουν την πεποίθηση του γράφοντα, ότι η παρούσα διατριβή παρέχει ανταγωνιστική τεχνογνωσία για την αντιμετώπιση των πολύπλοκων σύγχρονων και προβλεπόμενα μελλοντικών σχεδιαστικών προκλήσεων

The Design of a System Architecture for Mobile Multimedia Computers

This chapter discusses the system architecture of a portable computer, called Mobile Digital Companion, which provides support for handling multimedia applications energy efficiently. Because battery life is limited and battery weight is an important factor for the size and the weight of the Mobile Digital Companion, energy management plays a crucial role in the architecture. As the Companion must remain usable in a variety of environments, it has to be flexible and adaptable to various operating conditions. The Mobile Digital Companion has an unconventional architecture that saves energy by using system decomposition at different levels of the architecture and exploits locality of reference with dedicated, optimised modules. The approach is based on dedicated functionality and the extensive use of energy reduction techniques at all levels of system design. The system has an architecture with a general-purpose processor accompanied by a set of heterogeneous autonomous programmable modules, each providing an energy efficient implementation of dedicated tasks. A reconfigurable internal communication network switch exploits locality of reference and eliminates wasteful data copies