13,058 research outputs found
Multiagent cooperation for solving global optimization problems: an extendible framework with example cooperation strategies
This paper proposes the use of multiagent cooperation for solving global optimization problems through the introduction of a new multiagent environment, MANGO. The strength of the environment lays in itsflexible structure based on communicating software agents that attempt to solve a problem cooperatively. This structure allows the execution of a wide range of global optimization algorithms described as a set of interacting operations. At one extreme, MANGO welcomes an individual non-cooperating agent, which is basically the traditional way of solving a global optimization problem. At the other extreme, autonomous agents existing in the environment cooperate as they see fit during run time. We explain the development and communication tools provided in the environment as well as examples of agent realizations and cooperation scenarios. We also show how the multiagent structure is more effective than having a single nonlinear optimization algorithm with randomly selected initial points
Detecting Possible Manipulators in Elections
Manipulation is a problem of fundamental importance in the context of voting
in which the voters exercise their votes strategically instead of voting
honestly to prevent selection of an alternative that is less preferred. The
Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem shows that there is no strategy-proof voting rule
that simultaneously satisfies certain combinations of desirable properties.
Researchers have attempted to get around the impossibility results in several
ways such as domain restriction and computational hardness of manipulation.
However these approaches have been shown to have limitations. Since prevention
of manipulation seems to be elusive, an interesting research direction
therefore is detection of manipulation. Motivated by this, we initiate the
study of detection of possible manipulators in an election.
We formulate two pertinent computational problems - Coalitional Possible
Manipulators (CPM) and Coalitional Possible Manipulators given Winner (CPMW),
where a suspect group of voters is provided as input to compute whether they
can be a potential coalition of possible manipulators. In the absence of any
suspect group, we formulate two more computational problems namely Coalitional
Possible Manipulators Search (CPMS), and Coalitional Possible Manipulators
Search given Winner (CPMSW). We provide polynomial time algorithms for these
problems, for several popular voting rules. For a few other voting rules, we
show that these problems are in NP-complete. We observe that detecting
manipulation maybe easy even when manipulation is hard, as seen for example, in
the case of the Borda voting rule.Comment: Accepted in AAMAS 201
Influence-Optimistic Local Values for Multiagent Planning --- Extended Version
Recent years have seen the development of methods for multiagent planning
under uncertainty that scale to tens or even hundreds of agents. However, most
of these methods either make restrictive assumptions on the problem domain, or
provide approximate solutions without any guarantees on quality. Methods in the
former category typically build on heuristic search using upper bounds on the
value function. Unfortunately, no techniques exist to compute such upper bounds
for problems with non-factored value functions. To allow for meaningful
benchmarking through measurable quality guarantees on a very general class of
problems, this paper introduces a family of influence-optimistic upper bounds
for factored decentralized partially observable Markov decision processes
(Dec-POMDPs) that do not have factored value functions. Intuitively, we derive
bounds on very large multiagent planning problems by subdividing them in
sub-problems, and at each of these sub-problems making optimistic assumptions
with respect to the influence that will be exerted by the rest of the system.
We numerically compare the different upper bounds and demonstrate how we can
achieve a non-trivial guarantee that a heuristic solution for problems with
hundreds of agents is close to optimal. Furthermore, we provide evidence that
the upper bounds may improve the effectiveness of heuristic influence search,
and discuss further potential applications to multiagent planning.Comment: Long version of IJCAI 2015 paper (and extended abstract at AAMAS
2015
A principled information valuation for communications during multi-agent coordination
Decentralised coordination in multi-agent systems is typically achieved using communication. However, in many cases, communication is expensive to utilise because there is limited bandwidth, it may be dangerous to communicate, or communication may simply be unavailable at times. In this context, we argue for a rational approach to communication --- if it has a cost, the agents should be able to calculate a value of communicating. By doing this, the agents can balance the need to communicate with the cost of doing so. In this research, we present a novel model of rational communication that uses information theory to value communications, and employ this valuation in a decision theoretic coordination mechanism. A preliminary empirical evaluation of the benefits of this approach is presented in the context of the RoboCupRescue simulator
- …