5,539 research outputs found

    Kernelization and Sparseness: the case of Dominating Set

    Get PDF
    We prove that for every positive integer rr and for every graph class G\mathcal G of bounded expansion, the rr-Dominating Set problem admits a linear kernel on graphs from G\mathcal G. Moreover, when G\mathcal G is only assumed to be nowhere dense, then we give an almost linear kernel on G\mathcal G for the classic Dominating Set problem, i.e., for the case r=1r=1. These results generalize a line of previous research on finding linear kernels for Dominating Set and rr-Dominating Set. However, the approach taken in this work, which is based on the theory of sparse graphs, is radically different and conceptually much simpler than the previous approaches. We complement our findings by showing that for the closely related Connected Dominating Set problem, the existence of such kernelization algorithms is unlikely, even though the problem is known to admit a linear kernel on HH-topological-minor-free graphs. Also, we prove that for any somewhere dense class G\mathcal G, there is some rr for which rr-Dominating Set is W[22]-hard on G\mathcal G. Thus, our results fall short of proving a sharp dichotomy for the parameterized complexity of rr-Dominating Set on subgraph-monotone graph classes: we conjecture that the border of tractability lies exactly between nowhere dense and somewhere dense graph classes.Comment: v2: new author, added results for r-Dominating Sets in bounded expansion graph

    Algorithmic aspects of disjunctive domination in graphs

    Full text link
    For a graph G=(V,E)G=(V,E), a set DVD\subseteq V is called a \emph{disjunctive dominating set} of GG if for every vertex vVDv\in V\setminus D, vv is either adjacent to a vertex of DD or has at least two vertices in DD at distance 22 from it. The cardinality of a minimum disjunctive dominating set of GG is called the \emph{disjunctive domination number} of graph GG, and is denoted by γ2d(G)\gamma_{2}^{d}(G). The \textsc{Minimum Disjunctive Domination Problem} (MDDP) is to find a disjunctive dominating set of cardinality γ2d(G)\gamma_{2}^{d}(G). Given a positive integer kk and a graph GG, the \textsc{Disjunctive Domination Decision Problem} (DDDP) is to decide whether GG has a disjunctive dominating set of cardinality at most kk. In this article, we first propose a linear time algorithm for MDDP in proper interval graphs. Next we tighten the NP-completeness of DDDP by showing that it remains NP-complete even in chordal graphs. We also propose a (ln(Δ2+Δ+2)+1)(\ln(\Delta^{2}+\Delta+2)+1)-approximation algorithm for MDDP in general graphs and prove that MDDP can not be approximated within (1ϵ)ln(V)(1-\epsilon) \ln(|V|) for any ϵ>0\epsilon>0 unless NP \subseteq DTIME(VO(loglogV))(|V|^{O(\log \log |V|)}). Finally, we show that MDDP is APX-complete for bipartite graphs with maximum degree 33
    corecore