Learning Visual Question Answering by Bootstrapping Hard Attention

Attention mechanisms in biological perception are thought to select subsets of perceptual information for more sophisticated processing which would be prohibitive to perform on all sensory inputs. In computer vision, however, there has been relatively little exploration of hard attention, where some information is selectively ignored, in spite of the success of soft attention, where information is re-weighted and aggregated, but never filtered out. Here, we introduce a new approach for hard attention and find it achieves very competitive performance on a recently-released visual question answering datasets, equalling and in some cases surpassing similar soft attention architectures while entirely ignoring some features. Even though the hard attention mechanism is thought to be non-differentiable, we found that the feature magnitudes correlate with semantic relevance, and provide a useful signal for our mechanism's attentional selection criterion. Because hard attention selects important features of the input information, it can also be more efficient than analogous soft attention mechanisms. This is especially important for recent approaches that use non-local pairwise operations, whereby computational and memory costs are quadratic in the size of the set of features.Comment: ECCV 201

Being Negative but Constructively: Lessons Learnt from Creating Better Visual Question Answering Datasets

Visual question answering (Visual QA) has attracted a lot of attention lately, seen essentially as a form of (visual) Turing test that artificial intelligence should strive to achieve. In this paper, we study a crucial component of this task: how can we design good datasets for the task? We focus on the design of multiple-choice based datasets where the learner has to select the right answer from a set of candidate ones including the target (\ie the correct one) and the decoys (\ie the incorrect ones). Through careful analysis of the results attained by state-of-the-art learning models and human annotators on existing datasets, we show that the design of the decoy answers has a significant impact on how and what the learning models learn from the datasets. In particular, the resulting learner can ignore the visual information, the question, or both while still doing well on the task. Inspired by this, we propose automatic procedures to remedy such design deficiencies. We apply the procedures to re-construct decoy answers for two popular Visual QA datasets as well as to create a new Visual QA dataset from the Visual Genome project, resulting in the largest dataset for this task. Extensive empirical studies show that the design deficiencies have been alleviated in the remedied datasets and the performance on them is likely a more faithful indicator of the difference among learning models. The datasets are released and publicly available via http://www.teds.usc.edu/website_vqa/.Comment: Accepted for Oral Presentation at NAACL-HLT 201

이야기형 설명문을 활용한 대규모 비디오 학습 연구

학위논문 (박사) -- 서울대학교 대학원 : 공과대학 컴퓨터공학부, 2021. 2. 김건희.Extensive contributions are being made to develop intelligent agents that can recognize and communicate with the world. In this sense, various video-language tasks have drawn a lot of interests in computer vision research, including image/video captioning, video retrieval and video question answering. It can be applied to high-level computer vision tasks and various future industries such as search engines, social marketing, automated driving, and robotics support through QA / dialog generation for the surrounding environment. However, despite these developments, video-language learning suffers from a higher degree of complexity. This thesis investigates methodologies for learning the relationship between videos and free-formed languages, including explanations, conversations, and question-and-answers, so that the machine can easily adapt to target downstream tasks. First, we introduce several methods to learn the relationship between long sentences and videos efficiently. We introduce the approaches for supervising human attention transfer for the video attention model, which shows the video attention mechanism can benefit from explicit human gaze labels. Next, we introduce the end-to-end semantic attention method, which further reduces the visual attention algorithm's complexity by using the representative visual concept word detected by the attention-based detector. As a follow-up study on previous methods, we introduce a JSFusion (Joint Sequence Fusion) method that enables efficient video search and QA by enabling many-to-many matching of attention model. Next, we introduce the CiSIN(Character in Story Identification Network), which uses Attention to increase the performance of character grounding and character re-identification in the movie. Finally, we introduce Transitional Adaptation, which promotes the caption generation models to generates coherent narratives for long videos. In summary, this thesis presents a novel approaches for automatic video description generation/retrieval and shows the benefits of extracting linguistic knowledge for object and motion in the video as well as the advantage of multimodal audio-visual learning for understanding videos. Since the proposed methods are easily adapted to any video-language tasks, it is expected to be applied to the latest models, bringing additional performance improvements. Moving forward, we plan to design an unsupervised video learning framework that can solve many challenges in the industry by integrating an unlimited amount of video, audio, and free-formed language data from the web.시각-언어 학습은 이미지/비디오 캡션(Image/Video captioning), 시각 질의응답(Visual Question and Answering), 비디오 검색(Video Retrieval), 장면 이해(scene understanding), 이벤트 인식(event detection) 등 고차원의 컴퓨터 비전 태스크(task)뿐만 아니라 주변 환경에 대한 질의 응답 및 대화 생성(Dialogue Generation)으로 인터넷 검색 뿐만 아니라 최근 활발한 소셜 마케팅(Social Marketing) 자율 주행(Automated Driving), 로보틱스(Robotics)을 보조하는 등 여러 미래 산업에 적용될 수 있어 활발히 연구되고 있는 중요한 분야이다. 컴퓨터 비젼과 자연어 처리는 이러한 중요성을 바탕으로 각자 고유한 영역에서 발전을 거듭해 왔으나, 최근 딥러닝의 등장과 함께 눈부시게 발전하면서 서로를 보완하며 학습 결과를 향상시키는 등 큰 시너지 효과를 발휘하게 되었다. 하지만 이런 발전에도 불구하고, 비디오-언어간 학습은 문제의 복잡도가 한층 높아 어려움을 겪게 되는 경우가 많다. 본 논문에서는 비디오와 이에 대응하는 설명, 대화, 질의 응답 등 더 나아가 자유 형태의 언어 (Free-formed language)간의 관계를 더욱 효율적으로 학습하고, 목표 임무에 잘 대응할 수 있도록 개선하는 것을 목표로 한다. 먼저, 시각적 복잡도가 이미지보다 높은 비디오와 긴 문장 사이의 관계를 효율적으로 학습하기 위한 여러 방법들을 소개한다. 인간의 주의 인식(Attention) 모델을 비디오-언어 모델에 지도 학습 하는 방법을 소개하고, 이어서 비디오에서 우선 검출된 대표 시각 단어를 매개로 하여 주의 인식(Attention) 알고리즘의 복잡도를 더욱 줄이는 의미 중심 주의 인식 (Semantic Attention) 방법, 어텐션 모델의 다대다 매칭을 기반으로 효율적인 비디오 검색 및 질의응답을 가능케 하는 비디오-언어간 융합 (Joint Sequence Fusion) 방법 등 비디오 주의 인식을 효율적으로 학습시킬 수 있는 방법들을 제시한다. 다음으로는, 주의 인식(Attention) 모델이 물체-단어 간 관계를 넘어 비디오 상에서 인물 검색 (Person Searching) 그리고 인물 재 식별 (Person Re-Identification)을 동시에 수행하며 상승작용을 일으키는 스토리 속 캐릭터 인식 신경망 (Character in Story Identification Network) 을 소개하며, 마지막으로 자기 지도 학습(Self-supervised Learning)을 통해 주의 인식(Attention) 기반 언어 모델이 긴 비디오에 대한 설명을 연관성 있게 잘 생성할 수 있도록 유도하는 방법을 소개한다. 요약하자면, 이 학위 논문에서 제안한 새로운 방법론들은 비디오-언어 학습에 해당하는 비디오 캡션(Video captioning), 비디오 검색(Video Retrieval), 시각 질의응답(Video Question and Answering)등을 해결할 수 있는 기술적 디딤돌이 되며, 비디오 캡션 학습을 통해 학습된 주의 인식 모듈은 검색 및 질의응답, 인물 검색 등 각 네트워크에 이식되면서 새로운 문제들에 대해 동시에 최고 수준(State-of-the-art)의 성능을 달성하였다. 이를 통해 비디오-언어 학습으로 얻은 언어 지식의 이전은 시각-청각을 아우르는 비디오 멀티모달 학습에 큰 도움이 되는 것을 실험적으로 보여준다. 향후 작업 방향 (Future Work)으로는 앞서 연구한 내용들을 기반으로 웹 속에 존재하는 대규모의 언어, 비디오, 오디오 데이터를 통합해 학습에 활용하여 산업계의 많은 난제를 해결할 수 있는 비지도 학습 모델을 만들고자 한다.Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 1.2 Outline of the thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8 Chapter 2 Related Work 2.1 Video Captioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 2.2 Video Retrieval with Natural Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.3 Video Question and Answering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.4 Cross-modal Representation Learning for Vision and LanguageTasks . . . . 15 Chapter 3 Human Attention Transfer for Video Captioning18 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Video Datasets for Caption and Gaze . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.3 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.3.1 Video Pre-processing and Description . . . . . . . . . . . 22 3.3.2The Recurrent Gaze Prediction (RGP) Model . . . . . . . 23 3.3.3Construction of Visual Feature Pools . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.3.4The Decoder for Caption Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 3.3.5Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 3.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.4.1Evaluation of Gaze Prediction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 3.4.2Evaluation of Video Captioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.4.3Human Evaluation via AMT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 Chapter 4 Semantic Word Attention for Video QA and VideoCaptioning 4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 4.1.1Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 4.1.2Contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 4.2 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2.1Preprocessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 4.2.2An Attention Model for Concept Detection . . . . . . . . 42 4.2.3Video-to-Language Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.2.4A Model for Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4.2.5A Model for Fill-in-the-Blank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 4.2.6A Model for Multiple-Choice Test . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.2.7A Model for Retrieval . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 4.3 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.3.1The LSMDC Dataset and Tasks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 4.3.2Quantitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 4.3.3Qualitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.4 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Chapter 5 Joint Sequnece Fusion Attention for Multimodal Sequence Data 5.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 5.2 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 5.3 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.3.1Preprocessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 5.3.2The Joint Semantic Tensor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 5.3.3The Convolutional Hierarchical Decoder . . . . . . . . . . 66 5.3.4An Illustrative Example of How the JSFusion Model Works 68 5.3.5Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 5.3.6Implementation of Video-Language Models . . . . . . . . 69 5.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 5.4.1LSMDC Dataset and Tasks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 5.4.2MSR-VTT-(RET/MC) Dataset and Tasks . . . . . . . . . 73 5.4.3Quantitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 5.4.4Qualitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 5.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 Chapter 6 Character Re-Identification and Character Ground-ing for Movie Understanding 6.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 6.2 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 6.3 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 6.3.1Video Preprocessing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 6.3.2Visual Track Embedding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 6.3.3Textual Character Embedding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 6.3.4Character Grounding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 6.3.5Re-Identification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 6.3.6Joint Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 6.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 6.4.1Experimental Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 6.4.2Quantitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 6.4.3Qualitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 6.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Chapter 7 Transitional Adaptation of Pretrained Models forVisual Storytelling 7.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 7.2 Related Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 7.3 Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 7.3.1The Visual Encoder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 7.3.2The Language Generator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 7.3.3Adaptation training . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 7.3.4The Sequential Coherence Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 7.3.5Training with the adaptation Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 7.3.6Fine-tuning and Inference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 7.4 Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 7.4.1Experimental Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 7.4.2Quantitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 7.4.3Further Analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 7.4.4Human Evaluation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 7.4.5Qualitative Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 7.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 Chapter 8 Conclusion 8.1 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 8.2 Future Works . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Bibliography ... 123 요약 ... 148 Acknowledgements ... 150Docto

Visual Question Answering: A Survey of Methods and Datasets

Visual Question Answering (VQA) is a challenging task that has received increasing attention from both the computer vision and the natural language processing communities. Given an image and a question in natural language, it requires reasoning over visual elements of the image and general knowledge to infer the correct answer. In the first part of this survey, we examine the state of the art by comparing modern approaches to the problem. We classify methods by their mechanism to connect the visual and textual modalities. In particular, we examine the common approach of combining convolutional and recurrent neural networks to map images and questions to a common feature space. We also discuss memory-augmented and modular architectures that interface with structured knowledge bases. In the second part of this survey, we review the datasets available for training and evaluating VQA systems. The various datatsets contain questions at different levels of complexity, which require different capabilities and types of reasoning. We examine in depth the question/answer pairs from the Visual Genome project, and evaluate the relevance of the structured annotations of images with scene graphs for VQA. Finally, we discuss promising future directions for the field, in particular the connection to structured knowledge bases and the use of natural language processing models.Comment: 25 page