558 research outputs found

    Lossy Kernelization

    Get PDF
    In this paper we propose a new framework for analyzing the performance of preprocessing algorithms. Our framework builds on the notion of kernelization from parameterized complexity. However, as opposed to the original notion of kernelization, our definitions combine well with approximation algorithms and heuristics. The key new definition is that of a polynomial size α\alpha-approximate kernel. Loosely speaking, a polynomial size α\alpha-approximate kernel is a polynomial time pre-processing algorithm that takes as input an instance (I,k)(I,k) to a parameterized problem, and outputs another instance (I,k)(I',k') to the same problem, such that I+kkO(1)|I'|+k' \leq k^{O(1)}. Additionally, for every c1c \geq 1, a cc-approximate solution ss' to the pre-processed instance (I,k)(I',k') can be turned in polynomial time into a (cα)(c \cdot \alpha)-approximate solution ss to the original instance (I,k)(I,k). Our main technical contribution are α\alpha-approximate kernels of polynomial size for three problems, namely Connected Vertex Cover, Disjoint Cycle Packing and Disjoint Factors. These problems are known not to admit any polynomial size kernels unless NPcoNP/polyNP \subseteq coNP/poly. Our approximate kernels simultaneously beat both the lower bounds on the (normal) kernel size, and the hardness of approximation lower bounds for all three problems. On the negative side we prove that Longest Path parameterized by the length of the path and Set Cover parameterized by the universe size do not admit even an α\alpha-approximate kernel of polynomial size, for any α1\alpha \geq 1, unless NPcoNP/polyNP \subseteq coNP/poly. In order to prove this lower bound we need to combine in a non-trivial way the techniques used for showing kernelization lower bounds with the methods for showing hardness of approximationComment: 58 pages. Version 2 contain new results: PSAKS for Cycle Packing and approximate kernel lower bounds for Set Cover and Hitting Set parameterized by universe siz

    Randomized Parameterized Algorithms for the Kidney Exchange Problem

    Get PDF
    In order to increase the potential kidney transplants between patients and their incompatible donors, kidney exchange programs have been created in many countries. In the programs, designing algorithms for the kidney exchange problem plays a critical role. The graph theory model of the kidney exchange problem is to find a maximum weight packing of vertex-disjoint cycles and chains for a given weighted digraph. In general, the length of cycles is not more than a given constant L (typically 2 L 5), and the objective function corresponds to maximizing the number of possible kidney transplants. In this paper, we study the parameterized complexity and randomized algorithms for the kidney exchange problem without chains from theory. We construct two different parameterized models of the kidney exchange problem for two cases L = 3 and L 3, and propose two randomized parameterized algorithms based on the random partitioning technique and the randomized algebraic technique, respectively

    Parameterized algorithms of fundamental NP-hard problems: a survey

    Get PDF
    Parameterized computation theory has developed rapidly over the last two decades. In theoretical computer science, it has attracted considerable attention for its theoretical value and significant guidance in many practical applications. We give an overview on parameterized algorithms for some fundamental NP-hard problems, including MaxSAT, Maximum Internal Spanning Trees, Maximum Internal Out-Branching, Planar (Connected) Dominating Set, Feedback Vertex Set, Hyperplane Cover, Vertex Cover, Packing and Matching problems. All of these problems have been widely applied in various areas, such as Internet of Things, Wireless Sensor Networks, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Big Data, and so on. In this paper, we are focused on the algorithms’ main idea and algorithmic techniques, and omit the details of them

    Mixing Color Coding-Related Techniques

    Full text link
    Narrow sieves, representative sets and divide-and-color are three breakthrough color coding-related techniques, which led to the design of extremely fast parameterized algorithms. We present a novel family of strategies for applying mixtures of them. This includes: (a) a mix of representative sets and narrow sieves; (b) a faster computation of representative sets under certain separateness conditions, mixed with divide-and-color and a new technique, "balanced cutting"; (c) two mixtures of representative sets, iterative compression and a new technique, "unbalanced cutting". We demonstrate our strategies by obtaining, among other results, significantly faster algorithms for kk-Internal Out-Branching and Weighted 3-Set kk-Packing, and a framework for speeding-up the previous best deterministic algorithms for kk-Path, kk-Tree, rr-Dimensional kk-Matching, Graph Motif and Partial Cover

    Determinantal Sieving

    Full text link
    We introduce determinantal sieving, a new, remarkably powerful tool in the toolbox of algebraic FPT algorithms. Given a polynomial P(X)P(X) on a set of variables X={x1,,xn}X=\{x_1,\ldots,x_n\} and a linear matroid M=(X,I)M=(X,\mathcal{I}) of rank kk, both over a field F\mathbb{F} of characteristic 2, in 2k2^k evaluations we can sieve for those terms in the monomial expansion of PP which are multilinear and whose support is a basis for MM. Alternatively, using 2k2^k evaluations of PP we can sieve for those monomials whose odd support spans MM. Applying this framework, we improve on a range of algebraic FPT algorithms, such as: 1. Solving qq-Matroid Intersection in time O(2(q2)k)O^*(2^{(q-2)k}) and qq-Matroid Parity in time O(2qk)O^*(2^{qk}), improving on O(4qk)O^*(4^{qk}) (Brand and Pratt, ICALP 2021) 2. TT-Cycle, Colourful (s,t)(s,t)-Path, Colourful (S,T)(S,T)-Linkage in undirected graphs, and the more general Rank kk (S,T)(S,T)-Linkage problem, all in O(2k)O^*(2^k) time, improving on O(2k+S)O^*(2^{k+|S|}) respectively O(2S+O(k2log(k+F)))O^*(2^{|S|+O(k^2 \log(k+|\mathbb{F}|))}) (Fomin et al., SODA 2023) 3. Many instances of the Diverse X paradigm, finding a collection of rr solutions to a problem with a minimum mutual distance of dd in time O(2r(r1)d/2)O^*(2^{r(r-1)d/2}), improving solutions for kk-Distinct Branchings from time 2O(klogk)2^{O(k \log k)} to O(2k)O^*(2^k) (Bang-Jensen et al., ESA 2021), and for Diverse Perfect Matchings from O(22O(rd))O^*(2^{2^{O(rd)}}) to O(2r2d/2)O^*(2^{r^2d/2}) (Fomin et al., STACS 2021) All matroids are assumed to be represented over a field of characteristic 2. Over general fields, we achieve similar results at the cost of using exponential space by working over the exterior algebra. For a class of arithmetic circuits we call strongly monotone, this is even achieved without any loss of running time. However, the odd support sieving result appears to be specific to working over characteristic 2

    Dagstuhl Reports : Volume 1, Issue 2, February 2011

    Get PDF
    Online Privacy: Towards Informational Self-Determination on the Internet (Dagstuhl Perspectives Workshop 11061) : Simone Fischer-Hübner, Chris Hoofnagle, Kai Rannenberg, Michael Waidner, Ioannis Krontiris and Michael Marhöfer Self-Repairing Programs (Dagstuhl Seminar 11062) : Mauro Pezzé, Martin C. Rinard, Westley Weimer and Andreas Zeller Theory and Applications of Graph Searching Problems (Dagstuhl Seminar 11071) : Fedor V. Fomin, Pierre Fraigniaud, Stephan Kreutzer and Dimitrios M. Thilikos Combinatorial and Algorithmic Aspects of Sequence Processing (Dagstuhl Seminar 11081) : Maxime Crochemore, Lila Kari, Mehryar Mohri and Dirk Nowotka Packing and Scheduling Algorithms for Information and Communication Services (Dagstuhl Seminar 11091) Klaus Jansen, Claire Mathieu, Hadas Shachnai and Neal E. Youn
    corecore