Regional data exchange to improve care for veterans after non-VA hospitalization: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Coordination of care, especially after a patient experiences an acute care event, is a challenge for many health systems. Event notification is a form of health information exchange (HIE) which has the potential to support care coordination by alerting primary care providers when a patient experiences an acute care event. While promising, there exists little evidence on the impact of event notification in support of reengagement into primary care. The objectives of this study are to 1) examine the effectiveness of event notification on health outcomes for older adults who experience acute care events, and 2) compare approaches to how providers respond to event notifications. METHODS: In a cluster randomized trial conducted across two medical centers within the U.S. Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system, we plan to enroll older patients (≥ 65 years of age) who utilize both VHA and non-VHA providers. Patients will be enrolled into one of three arms: 1) usual care; 2) event notifications only; or 3) event notifications plus a care transitions intervention. In the event notification arms, following a non-VHA acute care encounter, an HIE-based intervention will send an event notification to VHA providers. Patients in the event notification plus care transitions arm will also receive 30 days of care transition support from a social worker. The primary outcome measure is 90-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes will be high risk medication discrepancies as well as care transitions processes within the VHA health system. Qualitative assessments of the intervention will inform VHA system-wide implementation. DISCUSSION: While HIE has been evaluated in other contexts, little evidence exists on HIE-enabled event notification interventions. Furthermore, this trial offers the opportunity to examine the use of event notifications that trigger a care transitions intervention to further support coordination of care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02689076. "Regional Data Exchange to Improve Care for Veterans After Non-VA Hospitalization." Registered 23 February 2016

Addressing the Health Needs of an Aging America: New Opportunities for Evidence-Based Policy Solutions

This report systematically maps research findings to policy proposals intended to improve the health of the elderly. The study identified promising evidence-based policies, like those supporting prevention and care coordination, as well as areas where the research evidence is strong but policy activity is low, such as patient self-management and palliative care. Future work of the Stern Center will focus on these topics as well as long-term care financing, the health care workforce, and the role of family caregivers

Complex Care Management Program Overview

This report includes brief updates on various forms of complex care management including: Aetna - Medicare Advantage Embedded Case Management ProgramBrigham and Women's Hospital - Care Management ProgramIndependent Health - Care PartnersIntermountain Healthcare and Oregon Health and Science University - Care Management PlusJohns Hopkins University - Hospital at HomeMount Sinai Medical Center -- New York - Mount Sinai Visiting Doctors Program/ Chelsea-Village House Calls ProgramsPartners in Care Foundation - HomeMeds ProgramPrinceton HealthCare System - Partnerships for PIECEQuality Improvement for Complex Chronic Conditions - CarePartner ProgramSenior Services - Project Enhance/EnhanceWellnessSenior Whole Health - Complex Care Management ProgramSumma Health/Ohio Department of Aging - PASSPORT Medicaid Waiver ProgramSutter Health - Sutter Care Coordination ProgramUniversity of Washington School of Medicine - TEAMcar

Organizing the U.S. Health Care Delivery System for High Performance

Analyzes the fragmentation of the healthcare delivery system and makes policy recommendations -- including payment reform, regulatory changes, and infrastructure -- for creating mechanisms to coordinate care across providers and settings

Advancing Pharmacist Collaborative Care within Academic Health Systems.

INTRODUCTION:The scope of pharmacy practice has evolved over the last few decades to focus on the optimization of medication therapy. Despite this positive impact, the lack of reimbursement remains a significant barrier to the implementation of innovative pharmacist practice models. SUMMARY:We describe the successful development, implementation and outcomes of three types of pharmacist collaborative care models: (1) a pharmacist with physician oversight, (2) pharmacist-interprofessional teams and (3) physician-pharmacist teams. The outcome measurement of these pharmacist care models varied from the design phase to patient volume measurement and to comprehensive quality dashboards. All of these practice models have been successfully funded by affiliated health systems or grants. CONCLUSIONS:The expansion of pharmacist services delivered by clinical faculty has several benefits to affiliated health systems: (1) significant improvements in patient care quality, (2) access to experts in specialty areas, and (3) the dissemination of outcomes with national and international recognition, increasing the visibility of the health system

Health Care Leader Action Guide to Reduce Avoidable Readmissions

Outlines a four-step approach to reducing avoidable hospital readmissions. Suggests interventions during hospitalization, at discharge, and post-discharge, including patient and caregiver education, multidisciplinary care coordination, and home visits

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a nurse-delivered intervention to improve adherence to treatment for HIV : a pragmatic, multicentre, open-label, randomised clinical trial

This trial was funded from public money by the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW; grant number 171002208). Aardex provided support on the development of the study website. We thank all the HIV nurses and physicians from the seven HIV clinics involved in the AIMS study for their input and collaboration (Academic Medical Centre, Slotervaart hospital, and St. Lucas-Andreas hospital, all in Amsterdam; the Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden; HAGA hospital, The Hague; Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam; and Isala clinic, Zwolle), the study participants, and the Stichting HIV Monitoring (SHM) for their support in accessing the SHM database for identifying patient inclusion criteria and developing the Markov model. Finally, we thank and remember Herman Schaalma (deceased) for his contribution to the study design and grant application.Peer reviewedPostprin

The Effect of Telephone Follow-Up on Pain Experienced by Patients After Knee Replacement Surgery

Hospital length of stays are decreasing throughout the U.S. in an effort to contain healthcare costs, but these measures can be detrimental to patients. Those who get knee replacement surgery are finding their length of stay reduced from an average of 3 to 4 days to 24 to 48 hours, which can affect pain control and interfere with rehabilitation and recovery. This affects many people, as more than 632,000 knee replacements occur each year (American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 2008). The purpose of this evidence-based project was to evaluate the effect of telephone follow-up on pain experienced by knee replacement patients the first four weeks post-operatively. Orem’s Self Care Deficit Theory and the Stetler’s Model of evidence utilization were used to guide the project. Patients undergoing knee replacement were randomly assigned to the Intervention group or Usual Care group. The Intervention group received a scheduled telephone call each week for the first 4-weeks postoperatively and a completion call in week five. Those in the Usual Care group received one telephone call following the 4-week postoperative period. Each telephone call included the completion of a standardized questionnaire developed by the project coordinator. Pain coaching was offered to each patient by the project coordinator. Data were collected regarding the assessment of pain, the use of pain medication, and secondary concerns such as constipation, nausea, or edema. An independent-sample t test comparing the mean scores of the Intervention and Usual Care groups found a significant difference between the means (t (23)=-2.578, p \u3c .05), with the Intervention group reporting less pain. Data collected on secondary outcomes indicated constipation accounted for 24% of patient concerns and edema accounting for 5%. Telephone follow-up for post-operative patients is being adopted at the clinical site where the EBP project was completed