Spectra of lifted Ramanujan graphs

A random $n$-lift of a base graph $G$ is its cover graph $H$ on the vertices $[n]\times V(G)$, where for each edge $u v$ in $G$ there is an independent uniform bijection $\pi$, and $H$ has all edges of the form $(i,u),(\pi(i),v)$. A main motivation for studying lifts is understanding Ramanujan graphs, and namely whether typical covers of such a graph are also Ramanujan. Let $G$ be a graph with largest eigenvalue $\lambda_1$ and let $\rho$ be the spectral radius of its universal cover. Friedman (2003) proved that every "new" eigenvalue of a random lift of $G$ is $O(\rho^{1/2}\lambda_1^{1/2})$ with high probability, and conjectured a bound of $\rho+o(1)$, which would be tight by results of Lubotzky and Greenberg (1995). Linial and Puder (2008) improved Friedman's bound to $O(\rho^{2/3}\lambda_1^{1/3})$. For $d$-regular graphs, where $\lambda_1=d$ and $\rho=2\sqrt{d-1}$, this translates to a bound of $O(d^{2/3})$, compared to the conjectured $2\sqrt{d-1}$. Here we analyze the spectrum of a random $n$-lift of a $d$-regular graph whose nontrivial eigenvalues are all at most $\lambda$ in absolute value. We show that with high probability the absolute value of every nontrivial eigenvalue of the lift is $O((\lambda \vee \rho) \log \rho)$. This result is tight up to a logarithmic factor, and for $\lambda \leq d^{2/3-\epsilon}$ it substantially improves the above upper bounds of Friedman and of Linial and Puder. In particular, it implies that a typical $n$-lift of a Ramanujan graph is nearly Ramanujan.Comment: 34 pages, 4 figure

A Breezing Proof of the KMW Bound

In their seminal paper from 2004, Kuhn, Moscibroda, and Wattenhofer (KMW) proved a hardness result for several fundamental graph problems in the LOCAL model: For any (randomized) algorithm, there are input graphs with $n$ nodes and maximum degree $\Delta$ on which $\Omega(\min\{\sqrt{\log n/\log \log n},\log \Delta/\log \log \Delta\})$ (expected) communication rounds are required to obtain polylogarithmic approximations to a minimum vertex cover, minimum dominating set, or maximum matching. Via reduction, this hardness extends to symmetry breaking tasks like finding maximal independent sets or maximal matchings. Today, more than $15$ years later, there is still no proof of this result that is easy on the reader. Setting out to change this, in this work, we provide a fully self-contained and $\mathit{simple}$ proof of the KMW lower bound. The key argument is algorithmic, and it relies on an invariant that can be readily verified from the generation rules of the lower bound graphs.Comment: 21 pages, 6 figure

Nielsen equivalence in a class of random groups

We show that for every $n\ge 2$ there exists a torsion-free one-ended word-hyperbolic group $G$ of rank $n$ admitting generating $n$-tuples $(a_1,\ldots ,a_n)$ and $(b_1,\ldots ,b_n)$ such that the $(2n-1)$-tuples $$(a_1,\ldots ,a_n, \underbrace{1,\ldots ,1}_{n-1 \text{times}})\hbox{ and }(b_1,\ldots, b_n, \underbrace{1,\ldots ,1}_{n-1 \text{times}})$$ are not Nielsen-equivalent in $G$. The group $G$ is produced via a probabilistic construction.Comment: 34 pages, 2 figures; a revised final version, to appear in the Journal of Topolog