11,974 research outputs found

    Focusing on UN Village and Seorae Village as Comparative Case Studies

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(์„์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ํ˜‘๋™๊ณผ์ • ๋„์‹œ์„ค๊ณ„ํ•™์ „๊ณต, 2021.8. Choon Choi.The `Gatedness` as an urban phenomenon inside contemporary cities points at increased segregation at neighborhoods on both spatial and perceptional levels, even when no physical gates or enclosure is present. In the case of affluent neighborhoods, tactics for exclusivity have been creating segregated environments inside the central urban areas, and in turn decreased community interaction within the neighborhoods. `Gatedness`, or exclusionary neighborhoods separate themselves from the surrounding communities, and create small niche neighborhoods of exclusivity that enhance spatial segregation. The UN Village and Seorae Village in Seoul, offer two case studies for how such tactics are hidden in plain sight. The tactical criteria used in those two villages are also widespread in other communities throughout Seoul, which possibly will give further evidence on how they affect the urban trends and influence public realm in communities of various economic and social backgrounds. This overall acceptance of `gatedness` and other exclusionary elements such as signage, lack of public transportation, and pedestrian connectivity slowly have spread to other neighborhoods, creating a sense of otherness for outsiders.ํ˜„๋Œ€ ๋„์‹œ ๋‚ด๋ถ€์˜ ๋„์‹œ์  ํ˜„์ƒ์ธ '๊ฒŒ์ดํ‹ฐ๋“œ๋‹ˆ์Šค'๋Š” ๋ฌผ๋ฆฌ์  ์ถœ์ž…๋ฌธ์ด๋‚˜ ์™ธํ•จ์ด ์—†๋Š” ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋„ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์ , ์ง€๊ฐ์  ์ฐจ์›์—์„œ ๋™๋„ค์˜ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ์‹ฌํ•ด์ง€๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ฐ€๋ฆฌํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๋ถ€์œ ํ•œ ์ง€์—ญ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋ฐฐํƒ€์  ์ „๋žต์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๋„์‹ฌ ์ง€์—ญ ๋‚ด์— ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์„ ์กฐ์„ฑํ•˜๊ณ , ์ง€์—ญ ๋‚ด ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ ์ƒํ˜ธ์ž‘์šฉ์„ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ๊ฒŒ์ดํ‹ฐ๋“œ๋‹ˆ์Šค(Gatedness)๋Š” ์ฃผ๋ณ€ ์ง€์—ญ์‚ฌํšŒ์™€ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋˜์–ด ๊ณต๊ฐ„์  ๋ถ„๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ•ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฐํƒ€์  ์ž‘์€ ํ‹ˆ์ƒˆ ๋™๋„ค๋ฅผ ๋งŒ๋“ ๋‹ค. ์„œ์šธ ์œ ์—” ๋นŒ๋ฆฌ์ง€์™€ ์„œ๋ž˜ ๋งˆ์„์€ ์ด๋Ÿฐ ์ „์ˆ ์ด ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๋ˆˆ์— ๋„์ง€ ์•Š๋Š”๊ฐ€์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋‘ ๋งˆ์„์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์ „์ˆ ์  ๊ธฐ์ค€์€ ์„œ์šธ ์ „์—ญ์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ง€์—ญ ์‚ฌํšŒ์—๋„ ๋„๋ฆฌ ํผ์ ธ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ด ๋‘ ๋งˆ์„๋“ค์ด ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์ œ์ , ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ์ง€์—ญ ์‚ฌํšŒ์˜ ๊ณต๊ณต ์˜์—ญ์— ์–ด๋–ค ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š”์ง€ ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์ธ ์ฆ๊ฑฐ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ '๊ฒŒ์ดํ‹ฐ๋“œ๋‹ˆ์Šค'์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์ธ์‹๊ณผ ๊ฐ„ํŒ, ๋Œ€์ค‘๊ตํ†ต ๋ถ€์กฑ, ๋ณดํ–‰์ž ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ ๋“ฑ ๋ฐฐ์ œ ์š”์†Œ๊ฐ€ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ง€์—ญ์œผ๋กœ ์„œ์„œํžˆ ํ™•์‚ฐ๋˜๋ฉด์„œ ์™ธ๋ถ€์ธ์—๊ฒŒ๋„ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋Š๋‚Œ์„ ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background of Research 1 1.2 Research Questions 4 1.3 Purpose of Research 4 1.4 Research Methodology 5 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 2.1 Gated Community Definitions 7 2.1.1 Physical Definitions 8 2.1.2 Social Definitions 11 2.2 Social Fabric of Cities 12 2.3 Korean Gated Residential Units 13 2.4 Difference between Korean Gated Residential Units and Other Western Examples 16 2.5 Negative Influence of Gated Communities 19 Chapter 3 Hannam-dong, UN Village 23 3.1 UN Village General Information 23 3.2 History of the Area 27 3.3 UN Village Surroundings 30 3.4 Difference with Other Gated Neighborhoods of Seoul 31 Chapter 4 Spatial Segregation - Gatedness 35 4.1 Definition of Gatedness 35 4.2 Comparison of Gatedness and Gated Community 38 Chapter 5 Criterias of Spatial Segregation - Gatedness 41 5.1 Social Criteria 41 5.1.1 Otherness 41 5.1.2 Reputation 44 5.2 Physical Criteria 46 5.2.1 Geography 46 5.2.2 Connectivity 50 5.2.3 Accessibility 52 5.2.4 Signage 55 5.3 Impacts of Criteria 63 Chapter 6 Comperative Study on UN Village and Seorae Village 63 6.1 Seorae Village 63 6.1.1 Otherness 66 6.1.2 Reputation 68 6.1.3 Geography 69 6.1.4 Accessibility 70 6.1.5 Connectivity 71 6.1.6 Signage 72 6.2. Criteria in Seorae Village 64 6.2.1. Otherness 64 6.2.2. Reputation 66 6.2.3. Geography 67 6.2.4. Accessibility 68 6.2.5. Connectivity 69 6.2.6. Signage 70 6.3 Comparative study on Seorae Village and UN Village 78 Chapter 7 Conclusion 87 Bibliography 89 Appendix 93 Abstract in Korean 104์„

    Advancing IoT Platforms Interoperability

    Get PDF
    The IoT European Platforms Initiative (IoT-EPI) projects are addressing the topic of Internet of Things and Platforms for Connected Smart Objects and aim to deliver an IoT extended into a web of platforms for connected devices and objects that supports smart environments, businesses, services and persons with dynamic and adaptive configuration capabilities. The specific areas of focus of the research activities are architectures and semantic interoperability, which reliably cover multiple use cases. The goal is to deliver dynamically-configured infrastructure and integration platforms for connected smart objects covering multiple technologies and multiple intelligent artefacts. The IoT-EPI ecosystem has been created with the objective of increasing the impact of the IoT-related European research and innovation, including seven European promising projects on IoT platforms: AGILE, BIG IoT, INTER-IoT, VICINITY, SymbIoTe, bIoTope, and TagItSmart.This white paper provides an insight regarding interoperability in the IoT platforms and ecosystems created and used by IoT-EPI. The scope of this document covers the interoperability aspects, challenges and approaches that cope with interoperability in the current existing IoT platforms and presents some insights regarding the future of interoperability in this context. It presents possible solutions, and a possible IoT interoperability platform architecture

    Single Market 2.0: the European Union as a Platform. Research Papers in Law 2/2020.

    Get PDF
    ften defined as โ€œunfinished businessโ€, the European Unionโ€™s market integration process appears to have become more fragile than ever at the beginning of the new decade. Already in 2010, the Monti report denounced the existence of a Single Market โ€œfatigueโ€, which made it difficult to complete the market integration process, especially in most difficult areas such as services.1 Today, Brexit potentially threatens the future attractiveness of the Single Market, by depriving the Union of its third largest economy and leading to an unprecedented thorn in the EUโ€™s pride, as a Member of the Union sets sail. At the same time, the post-Brexit single market may become more cohesive and ambitious, as one of the most reluctant Member States leaves the group: the Union may also have the opportunity to re-discover some of the features of continental Europeโ€™s legal and economic traditions, from Civil Law rules to state-led industrial policy, which faced obstacles when the UK was in the Union.2 Against this background, the challenges for the Single Market project do not end with Brexit. To the contrary, EU policymakers are confronted with a frustrating prospect: as they try to complete the Single Market, technological evolution is pushing the frontier of integration further, requiring new efforts and policies to fully achieve the desired goal. In particular, the digital transformation is changing the traditional, textbook economics of market integration, based on tenets such as economies of scale and the four freedoms. The rise of the digital economy requires a radical change in the policies for the Single Market, as well as in the trade policies that underpin the whole market integration process. Trends such as the virtualisation, servitisation and platformisation of the economy (as described below), coupled with the rise of the Internet of Things and Artificial Intelligence, make market integration at once more appealing and increasingly challenging for EU policymakers, projecting the Single Market into a complete new dimension, in which the โ€œFifth Freedomโ€ (the free circulation of non-personal data) is intertwined with new concerns with the need to protect fundamental rights, and at the same time secure Europeโ€™s technological sovereignty

    Settlement in modern network-based payment infrastructures โ€“ description and prototype of the E-Settlement model

    Get PDF
    Payment systems are undergoing rapid and fundamental changes stimulated largely by technological progress especially distributed network technology and real-time processing. Internet and e-commerce will have a major impact on payment systems in the future. User demands and competition will speed up developments. Payment systems will move from conventions that were originally paper-based to truly network-based solutions. This paper presents a solution โ€“ E-Settlement โ€“ for improving interbank settlement systems. It is based on a decentralised approach to be fully integrated with the banksโ€™ payment systems. The basic idea is that central bank money, the settlement cover, is transferred as an encrypted digital stamp as part of the interbank payment message. The future payment systems would in this model operate close to the Internet/e-mail concept by sending payment messages directly from the sending bankโ€™s account/payment server to the system of the receiving bank with immediate final interbank settlement without intervening centralised processing. Payment systems would become more efficient and faster and the overall structure would be come straightforward. The E-Settlement and network-based system concept could be applied with major benefits for correspondent banking, ACH and RTGS processing environments. In order to assess this novel idea the Bank of Finland built a prototype of the E-Settlement model. It consist of a group of emulated banks sending payments to each other via a TCP/IP network under the control of a central bank as the liquidity provider and an administration site monitoring the system security. This paper contains an introduction to network-based payment systems and E-Settlement, the specifications of the E-Settlement model and the description, results and experiences of the actual E-Settlement prototype.network-based payment systems; settlement systems; interbank settlement; payment system integration

    Reprogramming the World: Cyberspace and the Geography of Global Order

    Get PDF
    We live in a world of โ€œfake newsโ€, data breaches, election hacking, and cyberwarfare. We live in a world in which 280 characters can change everything. Our analog past has been replaced with digital realities. The world itself is being reprogrammed. This statement might seem like a quippy metaphor, but it actually reveals something much more concrete. The central claim of this book is that digital technologies are rewiring the way that society understands and thinks about global order as Cyberspace changes the content of international borders. Understanding these developments is critical to understanding the future of global society

    Capital markets and e-fraud: policy note and concept paper for future study

    Get PDF
    The technological dependency of securities exchanges on internet-based (IP) platforms has dramatically increased the industry's exposure to reputation, market, and operational risks. In addition, the convergence of several innovations in the market are adding stress to these systems. These innovations affect everything from software to system design and architecture. These include the use of XML (extensible markup language) as the industry IP language, STP or straight through processing of data, pervasive or diffuse computing and grid computing, as well as the increased use of Internet and wireless. The fraud is not new, rather, the magnitude and speed by which fraud can be committed has grown exponentially due to the convergence of once private networks on-line. It is imperative that senior management of securities markets and brokerage houses be properly informed of the negative externalities associated with e-brokerage and the possible critical points of failure that exist in today's digitized financial sector as they grow into tomorrow's exchanges. The overwhelming issue regarding e-finance is to determine the true level of understanding that senior management has about on-line platforms, including the inherent risks and the depth of the need to use it wisely. Kellermann and McNevin attempt to highlight the various risks that have been magnified by the increasing digitalization of processes within the brokerage arena and explain the need for concerted research and analysis of these as well as the profound consequences that may entail without proper planning. An effective legal, regulatory, and enforcement framework is essential for creating the right incentive structure for market participants. The legal and regulatory framework should focus on the improvement of internal monitoring of risks and vulnerabilities, greater information sharing about these risks and vulnerabilities, education and training on the care and use of these technologies, and better reporting of risks and responses. Public/private partnerships and collaborations also are needed to create an electronic commerce (e-commerce) environment that is safe and sound.Environmental Economics&Policies,Insurance&Risk Mitigation,Financial Intermediation,ICT Policy and Strategies,Banks&Banking Reform

    Advancing IoT Platforms Interoperability

    Get PDF
    The IoT European Platforms Initiative (IoT-EPI) projects are addressing the topic of Internet of Things and Platforms for Connected Smart Objects and aim to deliver an IoT extended into a web of platforms for connected devices and objects that supports smart environments, businesses, services and persons with dynamic and adaptive configuration capabilities. The specific areas of focus of the research activities are architectures and semantic interoperability, which reliably cover multiple use cases. The goal is to deliver dynamically-configured infrastructure and integration platforms for connected smart objects covering multiple technologies and multiple intelligent artefacts. The IoT-EPI ecosystem has been created with the objective of increasing the impact of the IoT-related European research and innovation, including seven European promising projects on IoT platforms: AGILE, BIG IoT, INTER-IoT, VICINITY, SymbIoTe, bIoTope, and TagItSmart.This white paper provides an insight regarding interoperability in the IoT platforms and ecosystems created and used by IoT-EPI. The scope of this document covers the interoperability aspects, challenges and approaches that cope with interoperability in the current existing IoT platforms and presents some insights regarding the future of interoperability in this context. It presents possible solutions, and a possible IoT interoperability platform architecture
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore