27 research outputs found

    EFFICIENT QUANTIZATION PARAMETER ESTIMATION IN HEVC BASED ON ฯ-DOMAIN

    Get PDF
    International audienceThis paper proposes a quantization parameter estimation algorithm for HEVC CTU rate control. Several methods were proposed, mostly based on Lagrangian optimization combined with Laplacian distribution for transformed coeffi-cients. These methods are accurate but increase the encoder complexity. This paper provides an innovative reduced com-plexity algorithm based on a ฯ-domain rate model. Indeed, for each CTU, the algorithm predicts encoding parameters based on co-located CTU. By combining it with Laplacian distri-bution for transformed coefficients, we obtain the dead-zone boundary for quantization and the related quantization pa-rameter. Experiments in the HEVC HM Reference Software show a good accuracy with only a 3% average bitrate error and no PSNR deterioration for random-access configuration

    A Decoding-Complexity and Rate-Controlled Video-Coding Algorithm for HEVC

    Get PDF
    Video playback on mobile consumer electronic (CE) devices is plagued by fluctuations in the network bandwidth and by limitations in processing and energy availability at the individual devices. Seen as a potential solution, the state-of-the-art adaptive streaming mechanisms address the first aspect, yet the efficient control of the decoding-complexity and the energy use when decoding the video remain unaddressed. The quality of experience (QoE) of the end-usersโ€™ experiences, however, depends on the capability to adapt the bit streams to both these constraints (i.e., network bandwidth and deviceโ€™s energy availability). As a solution, this paper proposes an encoding framework that is capable of generating video bit streams with arbitrary bit rates and decoding-complexity levels using a decoding-complexityโ€“rateโ€“distortion model. The proposed algorithm allocates rate and decoding-complexity levels across frames and coding tree units (CTUs) and adaptively derives the CTU-level coding parameters to achieve their imposed targets with minimal distortion. The experimental results reveal that the proposed algorithm can achieve the target bit rate and the decoding-complexity with 0.4% and 1.78% average errors, respectively, for multiple bit rate and decoding-complexity levels. The proposed algorithm also demonstrates a stable frame-wise rate and decoding-complexity control capability when achieving a decoding-complexity reduction of 10.11 (%/dB). The resultant decoding-complexity reduction translates into an overall energy-consumption reduction of up to 10.52 (%/dB) for a 1 dB peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) quality loss compared to the HM 16.0 encoded bit streams

    Content-Split Block Search Algorithm Based High Efficiency Video Coding

    Get PDF
    690-693In this paper, the video streaming generation in H.265 using novel technique based on content split block (CSB) search algorithm is presented. The proposed algorithm exploits the Inter and Intra prediction through motion estimation and compensation (IPME) encoded to use four different QPs: 22, 27, 32, and 37, during the redundancy analysis in order to improve the quality of video frame encoded. The proposed algorithm exhibits the useful property of block structure based on content-tree representation for each and every frame to IPME coded without affecting either the bit rate of video stream and perceptual quality of the video frame. The proposed Search algorithm improves the visual quality of coded video frame and reduces the blocking artefacts of video frame passed through multi-stages of H.265

    Two-Pass Rate Control for Improved Quality of Experience in UHDTV Delivery

    Get PDF

    Hierarchical-p reference picture selection based error resilient video coding framework for high efficiency video coding transmission applications

    Full text link
    In this paper, a new reference picture selection (RPS) is proposed for a high efficiency video coding (HEVC) framework. In recent studies, HEVC has been shown to be sensitive to packet error which is unavoidable in transmission applications especially for wireless networks. RPS is an effective error resilient technique for video transmission systems where a feedback channel with short round trip delay time is available. However, its procedure cannot directly apply to the HEVC framework and thus this paper expands it. In RPS, error propagation can still happen during round trip delay time. To alleviate the effect of error propagation for better quality, the proposed algorithm considers both the RPS technique and the region-based intra mode selection method by using some novel features of HEVC. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the hierarchical-P RPS algorithm in terms of PSNR and other metrics. The average PSNR improvement of the proposed algorithm over the reference algorithm under 10% packet error rate is 1.56 dB for 1080p sequences, 2.32 dB for 720p sequences and 1.01 dB for wide video graphics array (WVGA) sequences, respectively. The performance of proposed method is also tested for applications where feedback information is not available. The proposed method shows noticeable improvement for video sequences that contain low or moderate level of motions

    Efficient HEVC-based video adaptation using transcoding

    Get PDF
    In a video transmission system, it is important to take into account the great diversity of the network/end-user constraints. On the one hand, video content is typically streamed over a network that is characterized by different bandwidth capacities. In many cases, the bandwidth is insufficient to transfer the video at its original quality. On the other hand, a single video is often played by multiple devices like PCs, laptops, and cell phones. Obviously, a single video would not satisfy their different constraints. These diversities of the network and devices capacity lead to the need for video adaptation techniques, e.g., a reduction of the bit rate or spatial resolution. Video transcoding, which modifies a property of the video without the change of the coding format, has been well-known as an efficient adaptation solution. However, this approach comes along with a high computational complexity, resulting in huge energy consumption in the network and possibly network latency. This presentation provides several optimization strategies for the transcoding process of HEVC (the latest High Efficiency Video Coding standard) video streams. First, the computational complexity of a bit rate transcoder (transrater) is reduced. We proposed several techniques to speed-up the encoder of a transrater, notably a machine-learning-based approach and a novel coding-mode evaluation strategy have been proposed. Moreover, the motion estimation process of the encoder has been optimized with the use of decision theory and the proposed fast search patterns. Second, the issues and challenges of a spatial transcoder have been solved by using machine-learning algorithms. Thanks to their great performance, the proposed techniques are expected to significantly help HEVC gain popularity in a wide range of modern multimedia applications

    Studying Rate Control Methods for UHDTV Delivery Using HEVC

    Get PDF
    Since the early video coding standardisation efforts, rate control has been considered essential for almost any application, and has therefore been extensively studied. With the advent of improved video coding standards, such as the current stateof-the-art High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) standard, and the introduction of advanced flexible coding tools, previous Rate-Distortion (RD) models used for rate control have become obsolete. To address this issue, some rate control methods have been recently proposed specifically for HEVC which introduce many useful features, such as a robust correspondence between the rate and Lagrange multiplier . However, when applying these rate control methods on sequences in the new Ultra High Definition Television (UHDTV) format, degraded coding performance was observed. In this paper, an analysis of the state-of-the-art HEVC rate control method was performed and two directions for its improvement were evaluated. These improvements target frame-level bit-allocation and model parameter initialisation. When compared to the rate control method implemented in the HEVC reference software, these improvements result in reduced BDrate losses of 3:1% and 2:1%, versus the 8:8% provided by the reference algorithm. Moreover, the proposed improvements improve the accuracy in hitting the target bit-rate./p

    HEVC-videokoodekin intra-ennustuksen toteutus FPGA-piireille C-kielestรค syntesoimalla

    Get PDF
    High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) is the latest video coding standard in video compression. With HEVC, it is possible to compress the video with half the bitrate compared to the previous video coding standard, Advanced Video Coding (AVC), with the same video quality. Now even, the complexity of the encoder is significantly larger. As designs become more and more complex, traditional hardware (HW) description languages (HDLs), such as Very High Speed Integrated Circuit Hardware Description Language (VHDL) or Verilog, can not be used to present the designs without increasing effort. The solution for this is a higher abstraction language for describing HW. High-Level Synthesis (HLS) is a way of using a programming language like C or C++ to describe the HW and automatically generating the HDL from it. This makes the code easier to understand and decreases the time used for implementing the design. This Thesis uses Catapult-C to create an HLS-based implementation of HEVC intra prediction for a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). The HEVC encoder used in this Thesis is open source Kvazaar which has been developed at Tampere University of Technology. The objective is to implement an intra prediction accelerator faster than implementing it with register-transfer level (RTL) using VHDL or Verilog and still get comparable area and performance. This Thesis presents six development versions of the intra prediction accelerator. The complexity of the accelerator grows gradually, as more features were added to it. The final version is able to perform the intra prediction, mode cost computation and mode decision for Full HD video at 24.5 fps using 11 662 adaptive logic modules (ALMs) on an Altera Cyclone V FPGA. This Thesis presents the benefits of Catapult-C and HLS. The implementation results were comparable to hand coded RTL but achieved with a fraction of the estimated time for a VHDL implementation. As a rough estimate, if something takes a month to implement in VHDL, it takes a week with HLS. The biggest gain with HLS is the fast process of changes. Only the C implementation needs to change. The testbench and the RTL-code are generated automatically

    Full RDO๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” HEVC ํ•˜๋“œ์›จ์–ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•œ Rate Control ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋“ฌ์˜ ๊ฐœ์„ ๊ณผ ๊ตฌํ˜„

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2015. 2. ์ฑ„์ˆ˜์ต.HM ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์—์„œ ์ ์šฉ๋œ coding tree unit (CTU) ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ rate control์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉด, rate control์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด์„œ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํšจ์œจ์ด ๋‚˜๋น ์ ธ Bjรธntegaard-delta rate (BD rate)๊ฐ€ ์•ฝ 4.14 % ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  HM ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์—์„œ๋Š” rate control ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋“ฌ์ด floating point๋กœ ๊ตฌํ˜„๋˜์–ด ์žˆ์–ด HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ HEVC์˜ reference SW์ธ HM ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์— ์ ์šฉ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋Š” rate control ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋“ฌ์˜ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํšจ์œจ์„ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ๊ณผ, HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์ˆ˜์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•œ ํ›„์—, ์ˆ˜์ •๋œ rate control ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋“ฌ์˜ HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ธฐ์—ฌ๋Š” picture ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ bit ํ• ๋‹น ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๊ฐœ์„ , HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ full RD cost์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ, log๋ฅผ ์ทจํ•œ log R-log ฮป model์˜ ๋„์ž…, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•œ rate control ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋“ฌ์˜ HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์ด๋‹ค. HM ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์˜ rate control์—์„œ picture ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ bit ํ• ๋‹น์€ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์‹œํ€€์Šค์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ํ›„๋ฐ˜๋ถ€์— bit rate์ด ๋ถ€์กฑํ•˜์—ฌ picture์˜ peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR)์ด ๊ธ‰๊ฒฉํžˆ ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์™„ํ™”ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ „์ฒด ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์‹œํ€€์Šค์—์„œ target bit ํ• ๋‹น์„ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์ดˆ๋ฐ˜๋ถ€์— bit์„ ์กฐ๊ธˆ ๋œ ํ• ๋‹นํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์‹œํ€€์Šค ํ›„๋ฐ˜๋ถ€์— ์ข€ ๋” bit์„ ํ• ๋‹นํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์‹œํ€€์Šค ํ›„๋ฐ˜์— PSNR์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์™„ํ™”์‹œํ‚ค๋„๋ก picture ์ˆ˜์ค€ bit ํ• ๋‹น์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ •๋œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋“ฌ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  transform & full RDO & reconstruction์„ ์œ„ํ•œ pipeline stage์—์„œ full RD cost๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ rate distortion optimization (RDO)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด pipeline stage์—์„œ full RD cost ๊ณ„์‚ฐํ•˜๋Š” HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ์งธ๋กœ rate control์˜ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํšจ์œจ์„ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ, CTU๋ณ„ ฮป๊ฐ€ ์•„๋‹Œ picture์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ฮป๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ์„ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‘˜์งธ๋กœ full RD cost ๊ณ„์‚ฐ์˜ HW ๋ณต์žก๋„๋ฅผ ์ค„์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ quantization step size (Qstep)์˜ ์ œ๊ณฑ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆˆ normalized full RD cost๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ full RD cost์˜ dynamic range๋ฅผ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ค„์˜€๋‹ค. HM ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์—์„œ rate control์˜ R-ฮป model์€ floating point๋กœ ๊ตฌํ˜„์ด ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ณ  ์ง€์ˆ˜ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ž˜์„œ R-ฮป model์„, ์„ ํ˜• ์—ฐ์‚ฐ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ณ  HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•˜๋„๋ก, log๋ฅผ ์ทจํ•˜์—ฌ log R-log ฮป model๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ˜•ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. HM ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” R-D model์ธ hyperbolic model์˜ parameter updateํ•  ๋•Œ log๋ฅผ ์ทจํ•œ model parameter์˜ update์˜ ๊ทผ์‚ฌ์ด๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— log R-log ฮป model์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํšจ์œจ์ด ์˜คํžˆ๋ ค ์กฐ๊ธˆ ์ข‹์•„์กŒ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  rate๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋“ค์˜ log domain๊ณผ real domain์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฐ’ ๋ณ€ํ™˜์„ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ look-up table (LUT)์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ log2์™€ anti-log2๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋‚˜๋ˆ—์…ˆ ์—ฐ์‚ฐ๋„ LUT์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ HW์˜ ๋ณต์žก๋„๋ฅผ ์ค„์—ฌ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜๋Š” rate control ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ํšจ์šฉ์„ฑ์„ 5๊ฐœ์˜ 1080p ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์‹œํ€€์Šค Kimono, ParkScene, Cactus, BasketballDrive, BQTerrace์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ํŒ๋‹จํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์€ common test condition์˜ random access (RA) configuration์œผ๋กœ TU split์„ ์ง€์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋„๋ก ํ•˜์—ฌ maximum TU depth๋ฅผ 1๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. Rate control์˜ target rate์€ rate control์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  QP 22, 27, 32, 37๋กœ ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ rate๋“ค๋กœ ์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ ๊ฐœ์„ ํ•œ rate control ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋“ฌ์€ HM ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์— ์ ์šฉ๋œ CTU-level rate control์˜ Y-BD rate 4.14 %๋ฅผ 1.99 %๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ›„๋ฐ˜์— PSNR์ด ๋–จ์–ด์ง€๋Š” ํ˜„์ƒ์„ ์ค„์—ฌ์„œ minimum PSNR์„ ํ‰๊ท  0.11 dB ํ–ฅ์ƒ ์‹œ์ผฐ๊ณ  ํŠนํžˆ ParkScene ์ด๋ฏธ์ง€ ์‹œํ€€์Šค์—์„œ๋Š” ์ตœ๋Œ€ 1.58 dB๊นŒ์ง€ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ rate control algorithm์„ HW๋กœ GOP, picture, CTU level์„ ๋ชจ๋‘ ์ง€์›ํ•˜๋„๋ก ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ–ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ, ๊ทธ ์ „์ฒด ๋ณต์žก๋„๋Š” 27.5 kgate์ด๊ณ  ์ถ”๊ฐ€๋กœ 32 KB์˜ ๋ฉ”๋ชจ๋ฆฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. Rate control์˜ ์ˆ˜ํ–‰์— ํ•„์š”ํ•œ cycle budget์€ CTU๋‹น 4 cycle๋กœ 4K 30 fps๋ฅผ 400 MHz์— ์ˆ˜ํ–‰ํ•œ๋‹ค๊ณ  ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— 0.06 %์˜ overhead์— ํ•ด๋‹นํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ „์ฒด ์ธ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ๊ณผ์ •์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ์ฃผ์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ค€์ด๋‹ค.์ œ 1 ์žฅ ์„œ ๋ก  1 1.1 ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ 2 1.2 ๊ด€๋ จ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ 7 1.3 ์ „์ฒด ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 12 ์ œ 2 ์žฅ HEVC HW ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์˜ pipeline ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 13 2.1 ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๋Š” HEVC HW ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์˜ pipeline ๊ตฌ์„ฑ 13 2.2 ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜๋Š” HW ๊ตฌ์กฐ์˜ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํšจ์œจ ์ €ํ•˜ 17 2.3 Full RD cost ์˜ˆ์ธก๊ธฐ HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์˜ ๊ฐœ์š” 20 ์ œ 3 ์žฅ HEVC์˜ CTU-level Rate control์˜ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋“ฌ ์„ค๋ช… 23 3.1 HM ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์˜ CTU-level rate control ์ „์ฒด ๊ณผ์ • 23 3.2 Target bit allocation 25 3.3 ฮป and QP calculation 32 3.4 Encoding 35 3.5 Model parameter update 35 ์ œ 4 ์žฅ HEVC์˜ CTU-level Rate control์˜ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ๋“ฌ์˜ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํšจ์œจ ๊ฐœ์„  39 4.1 Rate control์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ๊ณผ HM ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ 39 4.2 Bit saving์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ Picture-level bit allocation 43 4.3 Picture์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ฮป๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ rate control์˜ ์ฝ”๋”ฉ ํšจ์œจ ๊ฐœ์„  50 4.4 Full RDO์—์„œ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” normalized RD cost 51 ์ œ 5 ์žฅ HEVC์˜ CTU-level Rate control์˜ HW ๊ตฌํ˜„ 57 5.1 HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ log๋ฅผ ์ทจํ•œ log R-log ฮป model 58 5.2 HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ GOP์˜ picture๋ณ„ target rate ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• 62 5.3 HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ model parameter update 68 5.4 Rate control์˜ HW ๊ตฌํ˜„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ fixed point ์—ฐ์‚ฐ๊ณผ LUT ์‚ฌ์šฉ 70 5.5 Rate control์˜ HW ๊ตฌํ˜„๊ณผ HW ์ธ์ฝ”๋”์—์„œ์˜ rate control์˜ ๋™์ž‘ 75 ์ œ 6 ์žฅ ๊ฒฐ ๋ก  81 ์ฐธ๊ณ  ๋ฌธํ—Œ 83 Abstract 87Docto
    corecore