14 research outputs found

    Semifields in loop theory and in finite geometry

    Get PDF
    This paper is a relatively short survey the aim of which is to present the theory of semifields and the related areas of finite geometry to loop theorists

    Semifields, relative difference sets, and bent functions

    Full text link
    Recently, the interest in semifields has increased due to the discovery of several new families and progress in the classification problem. Commutative semifields play an important role since they are equivalent to certain planar functions (in the case of odd characteristic) and to modified planar functions in even characteristic. Similarly, commutative semifields are equivalent to relative difference sets. The goal of this survey is to describe the connection between these concepts. Moreover, we shall discuss power mappings that are planar and consider component functions of planar mappings, which may be also viewed as projections of relative difference sets. It turns out that the component functions in the even characteristic case are related to negabent functions as well as to Z4\mathbb{Z}_4-valued bent functions.Comment: Survey paper for the RICAM workshop "Emerging applications of finite fields", 09-13 December 2013, Linz, Austria. This article will appear in the proceedings volume for this workshop, published as part of the "Radon Series on Computational and Applied Mathematics" by DeGruyte

    (2^n,2^n,2^n,1)-relative difference sets and their representations

    Full text link
    We show that every (2n,2n,2n,1)(2^n,2^n,2^n,1)-relative difference set DD in Z4n\Z_4^n relative to Z2n\Z_2^n can be represented by a polynomial f(x)\in \F_{2^n}[x], where f(x+a)+f(x)+xaf(x+a)+f(x)+xa is a permutation for each nonzero aa. We call such an ff a planar function on \F_{2^n}. The projective plane Π\Pi obtained from DD in the way of Ganley and Spence \cite{ganley_relative_1975} is coordinatized, and we obtain necessary and sufficient conditions of Π\Pi to be a presemifield plane. We also prove that a function ff on \F_{2^n} with exactly two elements in its image set and f(0)=0f(0)=0 is planar, if and only if, f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y)f(x+y)=f(x)+f(y) for any x,y\in\F_{2^n}

    MRD codes with maximum idealizers

    Get PDF
    Left and right idealizers are important invariants of linear rank-distance codes. In the case of maximum rank-distance (MRD for short) codes in Fqn×n\mathbb{F}_q^{n\times n} the idealizers have been proved to be isomorphic to finite fields of size at most qnq^n. Up to now, the only known MRD codes with maximum left and right idealizers are generalized Gabidulin codes, which were first constructed in 1978 by Delsarte and later generalized by Kshevetskiy and Gabidulin in 2005. In this paper we classify MRD codes in Fqn×n\mathbb{F}_q^{n\times n} for n≤9n\leq 9 with maximum left and right idealizers and connect them to Moore-type matrices. Apart from generalized Gabidulin codes, it turns out that there is a further family of rank-distance codes providing MRD ones with maximum idealizers for n=7n=7, qq odd and for n=8n=8, q≡1(mod3)q\equiv 1 \pmod 3. These codes are not equivalent to any previously known MRD code. Moreover, we show that this family of rank-distance codes does not provide any further examples for n≥9n\geq 9.Comment: Reviewers' comments implemented, we changed the titl

    MRD codes with maximum idealisers

    Get PDF
    Left and right idealizers are important invariants of linear rank-distance codes. In the case of maximum rank-distance (MRD for short) codes in GF(q)^(n×n) the idealizers have been proved to be isomorphic to finite fields of size at most q^n. Up to now, the only known MRD codes with maximum left and right idealizers are generalized Gabidulin codes, which were first constructed in 1978 by Delsarte and later generalized by Kshevetskiy and Gabidulin in 2005. In this paper we classify MRD codes in GF(q)^(n×n) for n9
    corecore