741 research outputs found
On the decidability and complexity of Metric Temporal Logic over finite words
Metric Temporal Logic (MTL) is a prominent specification formalism for
real-time systems. In this paper, we show that the satisfiability problem for
MTL over finite timed words is decidable, with non-primitive recursive
complexity. We also consider the model-checking problem for MTL: whether all
words accepted by a given Alur-Dill timed automaton satisfy a given MTL
formula. We show that this problem is decidable over finite words. Over
infinite words, we show that model checking the safety fragment of MTL--which
includes invariance and time-bounded response properties--is also decidable.
These results are quite surprising in that they contradict various claims to
the contrary that have appeared in the literature
Decidable Classes of Tree Automata Mixing Local and Global Constraints Modulo Flat Theories
We define a class of ranked tree automata TABG generalizing both the tree
automata with local tests between brothers of Bogaert and Tison (1992) and with
global equality and disequality constraints (TAGED) of Filiot et al. (2007).
TABG can test for equality and disequality modulo a given flat equational
theory between brother subterms and between subterms whose positions are
defined by the states reached during a computation. In particular, TABG can
check that all the subterms reaching a given state are distinct. This
constraint is related to monadic key constraints for XML documents, meaning
that every two distinct positions of a given type have different values. We
prove decidability of the emptiness problem for TABG. This solves, in
particular, the open question of the decidability of emptiness for TAGED. We
further extend our result by allowing global arithmetic constraints for
counting the number of occurrences of some state or the number of different
equivalence classes of subterms (modulo a given flat equational theory)
reaching some state during a computation. We also adapt the model to unranked
ordered terms. As a consequence of our results for TABG, we prove the
decidability of a fragment of the monadic second order logic on trees extended
with predicates for equality and disequality between subtrees, and cardinality.Comment: 39 pages, to appear in LMCS journa
The exp-log normal form of types
Lambda calculi with algebraic data types lie at the core of functional
programming languages and proof assistants, but conceal at least two
fundamental theoretical problems already in the presence of the simplest
non-trivial data type, the sum type. First, we do not know of an explicit and
implemented algorithm for deciding the beta-eta-equality of terms---and this in
spite of the first decidability results proven two decades ago. Second, it is
not clear how to decide when two types are essentially the same, i.e.
isomorphic, in spite of the meta-theoretic results on decidability of the
isomorphism.
In this paper, we present the exp-log normal form of types---derived from the
representation of exponential polynomials via the unary exponential and
logarithmic functions---that any type built from arrows, products, and sums,
can be isomorphically mapped to. The type normal form can be used as a simple
heuristic for deciding type isomorphism, thanks to the fact that it is a
systematic application of the high-school identities.
We then show that the type normal form allows to reduce the standard beta-eta
equational theory of the lambda calculus to a specialized version of itself,
while preserving the completeness of equality on terms. We end by describing an
alternative representation of normal terms of the lambda calculus with sums,
together with a Coq-implemented converter into/from our new term calculus. The
difference with the only other previously implemented heuristic for deciding
interesting instances of eta-equality by Balat, Di Cosmo, and Fiore, is that we
exploit the type information of terms substantially and this often allows us to
obtain a canonical representation of terms without performing sophisticated
term analyses
A Generic Framework for Reasoning about Dynamic Networks of Infinite-State Processes
We propose a framework for reasoning about unbounded dynamic networks of
infinite-state processes. We propose Constrained Petri Nets (CPN) as generic
models for these networks. They can be seen as Petri nets where tokens
(representing occurrences of processes) are colored by values over some
potentially infinite data domain such as integers, reals, etc. Furthermore, we
define a logic, called CML (colored markings logic), for the description of CPN
configurations. CML is a first-order logic over tokens allowing to reason about
their locations and their colors. Both CPNs and CML are parametrized by a color
logic allowing to express constraints on the colors (data) associated with
tokens. We investigate the decidability of the satisfiability problem of CML
and its applications in the verification of CPNs. We identify a fragment of CML
for which the satisfiability problem is decidable (whenever it is the case for
the underlying color logic), and which is closed under the computations of post
and pre images for CPNs. These results can be used for several kinds of
analysis such as invariance checking, pre-post condition reasoning, and bounded
reachability analysis.Comment: 29 pages, 5 tables, 1 figure, extended version of the paper published
in the the Proceedings of TACAS 2007, LNCS 442
The intuitionistic temporal logic of dynamical systems
A dynamical system is a pair , where is a topological space and
is continuous. Kremer observed that the language of
propositional linear temporal logic can be interpreted over the class of
dynamical systems, giving rise to a natural intuitionistic temporal logic. We
introduce a variant of Kremer's logic, which we denote , and show
that it is decidable. We also show that minimality and Poincar\'e recurrence
are both expressible in the language of , thus providing a
decidable logic expressive enough to reason about non-trivial asymptotic
behavior in dynamical systems
- …