14 research outputs found

    Quasi-PTAS for Scheduling with Precedences using LP Hierarchies

    Get PDF
    A central problem in scheduling is to schedule n unit size jobs with precedence constraints on m identical machines so as to minimize the makespan. For m=3, it is not even known if the problem is NP-hard and this is one of the last open problems from the book of Garey and Johnson. We show that for fixed m and epsilon, {polylog}(n) rounds of Sherali-Adams hierarchy applied to a natural LP of the problem provides a (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm running in quasi-polynomial time. This improves over the recent result of Levey and Rothvoss, who used r=(log n)^{O(log log n)} rounds of Sherali-Adams in order to get a (1+epsilon)-approximation algorithm with a running time of n^O(r)

    A Simpler QPTAS for Scheduling Jobs with Precedence Constraints

    Get PDF

    Nearly-Linear Time LP Solvers and Rounding Algorithms for Scheduling Problems

    Get PDF
    We study nearly-linear time approximation algorithms for non-preemptive scheduling problems in two settings: the unrelated machine setting, and the identical machine with job precedence constraints setting, under the well-studied objectives such as makespan and weighted completion time. For many problems, we develop nearly-linear time approximation algorithms with approximation ratios matching the current best ones achieved in polynomial time. Our main technique is linear programming relaxation. For the unrelated machine setting, we formulate mixed packing and covering LP relaxations of nearly-linear size, and solve them approximately using the nearly-linear time solver of Young. For the makespan objective, we develop a rounding algorithm with (2+?)-approximation ratio. For the weighted completion time objective, we prove the LP is as strong as the rectangle LP used by Im and Li, leading to a nearly-linear time (1.45 + ?)-approximation for the problem. For problems in the identical machine with precedence constraints setting, the precedence constraints can not be formulated as packing or covering constraints. To achieve the nearly-linear running time, we define a polytope for the constraints, and leverage the multiplicative weight update (MWU) method with an oracle which always returns solutions in the polytope

    Makespan Scheduling of Unit Jobs with Precedence Constraints in O(1.995n)O(1.995^n) time

    Get PDF
    In a classical scheduling problem, we are given a set of nn jobs of unitlength along with precedence constraints and the goal is to find a schedule ofthese jobs on mm identical machines that minimizes the makespan. This problemis well-known to be NP-hard for an unbounded number of machines. Using standard3-field notation, it is known as Pprec,pj=1CmaxP|\text{prec}, p_j=1|C_{\max}. We present an algorithm for this problem that runs in O(1.995n)O(1.995^n) time.Before our work, even for m=3m=3 machines the best known algorithms ran inO(2n)O^\ast(2^n) time. In contrast, our algorithm works when the number ofmachines mm is unbounded. A crucial ingredient of our approach is an algorithmwith a runtime that is only single-exponential in the vertex cover of thecomparability graph of the precedence constraint graph. This heavily relies oninsights from a classical result by Dolev and Warmuth (Journal of Algorithms1984) for precedence graphs without long chains.<br

    Makespan Scheduling of Unit Jobs with Precedence Constraints in O(1.995n)O(1.995^n) time

    Full text link
    In a classical scheduling problem, we are given a set of nn jobs of unit length along with precedence constraints and the goal is to find a schedule of these jobs on mm identical machines that minimizes the makespan. This problem is well-known to be NP-hard for an unbounded number of machines. Using standard 3-field notation, it is known as Pprec,pj=1CmaxP|\text{prec}, p_j=1|C_{\max}. We present an algorithm for this problem that runs in O(1.995n)O(1.995^n) time. Before our work, even for m=3m=3 machines the best known algorithms ran in O(2n)O^\ast(2^n) time. In contrast, our algorithm works when the number of machines mm is unbounded. A crucial ingredient of our approach is an algorithm with a runtime that is only single-exponential in the vertex cover of the comparability graph of the precedence constraint graph. This heavily relies on insights from a classical result by Dolev and Warmuth (Journal of Algorithms 1984) for precedence graphs without long chains.Comment: 26 pages, 7 figure

    Nearly-Linear Time Approximate Scheduling Algorithms

    Full text link
    We study nearly-linear time approximation algorithms for non-preemptive scheduling problems in two settings: the unrelated machine setting, and the identical machine with job precedence constraints setting. The objectives we study include makespan, weighted completion time, and LqL_q norm of machine loads. We develop nearly-linear time approximation algorithms for the studied problems with O(1)O(1)-approximation ratios, many of which match the correspondent best known ratios achievable in polynomial time. Our main technique is linear programming relaxation. For problems in the unrelated machine setting, we formulate mixed packing and covering LP relaxations of nearly-linear size, and solve them approximately using the nearly-linear time solver of Young. We show the LP solutions can be rounded within O(1)O(1)-factor loss. For problems in the identical machine with precedence constraints setting, the precedence constraints can not be formulated as packing or covering constraints. To achieve the claimed running time, we define a polytope for the constraints, and leverage the multiplicative weight update (MWU) method with an oracle which always returns solutions in the polytope. Along the way of designing the oracle, we encounter the single-commodity maximum flow problem over a directed acyclic graph G=(V,E)G = (V, E), where sources and sinks have limited supplies and demands, but edges have infinite capacities. We develop a 11+ϵ\frac{1}{1+\epsilon}-approximation for the problem in time O(EϵlogV)O\left(\frac{|E|}{\epsilon}\log |V|\right), which may be of independent interest
    corecore