Doped and non-doped organic light-emitting diodes based on a yellow carbazole emitter into a blue-emitting matrix

A new carbazole derivative with a 3,3'-bicarbazyl core 6,6'-substituted by dicyanovinylene groups (6,6'-bis(1-(2,2'-dicyano)vinyl)-N,N'-dioctyl-3,3'-bicarbazyl; named (OcCz2CN)2, was synthesized by carbonyl-methylene Knovenagel condensation, characterized and used as a component of multilayer organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). Due to its -donor-acceptor type structure, (OcCz2CN)2 was found to emit a yellow light at max=590 nm (with the CIE coordinates x=0.51; y = 0.47) and was used either as a dopant or as an ultra-thin layer in a blue-emitting matrix of 4,4'-bis(2,2'-diphenylvinyl)-1,1'-biphenyl (DPVBi). DPVBi (OcCz2CN)2-doped structure exhibited, at doping ratio of 1.5 weight %, a yellowish-green light with the CIE coordinates (x = 0.31; y = 0.51), an electroluminescence efficiency EL=1.3 cd/A, an external quantum efficiency ext= 0.4 % and a luminance L= 127 cd/m2 (at 10 mA/cm2) whereas for non-doped devices utilizing the carbazolic fluorophore as a thin neat layer, a warm white with CIE coordinates (x = 0.40; y= 0.43), EL= 2.0 cd/A, ext= 0.7 %, L = 197 cd/m2 (at 10 mA/cm2) and a color rendering index (CRI) of 74, were obtained. Electroluminescence performances of both the doped and non-doped devices were compared with those obtained with 5,6,11,12-tetraphenylnaphtacene (rubrene) taken as a reference of highly efficient yellow emitter

Optimal Color Stability for White Organic Light-Emitting Diode (WOLED) by Using Multiple-Ultra-Thin Layers (MUTL)

The work demonstrates the improvement of color stability for white organic light-emitting diode (WOLED). The devices were prepared by vacuum deposition on ITO-glass substrates. These guest materials of 5,6,11,12-tetraphenylnaphthacene (Rubrene) were deposited in 4,4′-bis(2,2-diphenyl vinyl)-1,1′-biphenyl (DPVBi), resulting in an emitting layer. Experimental results reveal that the properties in the multiple-ultra-thin layer (MUTL) are better than those of the emitting layer with a single guest material, reaching the commercial white-light wavelength requirement of 400–700 nm. The function of the MUTL is as the light-emitting and trapping layer. The results show that the MUTL has excellent carrier capture effect, leading to high color stability of the device at various applied voltages. The Commissions Internationale De L’Eclairage (CIE) coordinate of this device at 3~7 V is few displacement and shows a very slight variation of (0.016, 0.009). The CIE coordinates at a maximal luminance of 9980 cd/m2 are (0.34, 0.33)

Charge-carrier dynamics in organic LEDs

Anyone who decides to buy a new mobile phone today is likely to buy a screen made from organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). OLEDs are a relatively new display technology and will probably account for the largest market share in the upcoming years. This is due to their brilliant colors, high achievable display resolution, and comparably simple processing. Since they are not based on the rigid crystal structure of classical semiconductors and can be produced as planar thin-film modules, they also enable the fabrication of large-area lamps on flexible substrates – an attractive scenario for future lighting systems. Despite these promising properties, the breakthrough of OLED lighting technology is still pending and requires further research. The charge-carrier dynamics in an OLED determine its device functionality and, therefore, enable the understanding of fundamental physical concepts and phenomena. From the description of charge-carrier dynamics, this work derives experimental methods and device concepts to optimize the efficiency and stability of OLEDs. OLEDs feature an electric current of charge carriers (electrons and holes) that are intended to recombine under the emission of light. This process is preceded by charge-carrier injection and their transport to the emission layer. These three aspects are discussed together in this work. First, a method is presented that quantifies injection resistances using a simple experiment. It provides a valuable opportunity to better understand and optimize injection layers. Subsequently, the charge carrier transport at high electrical currents, as required for OLEDs as bright lighting elements, will be investigated. Here, electro-thermal effects are presented that form physical limits for the design and function of OLED modules and explain their sudden failure. Finally, the dynamics and recombination of electro-statically bound charge carrier pairs, so-called excitons, are examined. Various options are presented for manipulating exciton dynamics in such a way that the emission behavior of the OLED can be adjusted according to specific requirements.:List of publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v List of abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1 Light sources and the human society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.1 Human light perception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.1.2 Physical light quantification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1.3 Non-visual light impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.1.4 Implications for modern light sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2 Organic semiconductors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.2.1 Molecular energy states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.2 Intramolecular state transitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.2.3 Molecular films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.2.4 Electrical doping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.2.5 Charge-carrier transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.2.6 Exciton formation and recombination . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.2.7 Exciton transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 2.3 Organic light-emitting diodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 2.3.1 Structure and operation principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 2.3.2 Metal-semiconductor interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 2.3.3 Typical operation characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2.4 Colloidal nanocrystal emitters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 2.4.1 Terminology: Nanocrystals and quantum dots . . . . . . . . 52 2.4.2 The particle-in-a-box model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 2.4.3 Surface passivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3 Materials and methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.1 Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.1.1 OLED materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.1.2 Materials for photoluminescence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.2 Sample preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 3.2.1 Thermal evaporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 3.2.2 Solution processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 3.3 Spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.3.1 Absorbance spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.3.2 Photoluminescence quantum yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.3.3 Excitation sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.3.4 Sensitive EQE for absorber materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.4 Exciton-lifetime analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 3.4.1 Triplet lifetime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 3.4.2 Singlet-state lifetime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 3.4.3 Lifetime extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 3.5 OLED characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 3.5.1 Current-voltage-luminance and quantum efficiency . . . . . . 73 3.5.2 Temperature-controlled evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4 Charge-carrier injection into doped organic films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4.1 Ohmic injection contacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4.2 Device architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.2.1 Conception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.2.2 Device symmetry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.2.3 Device homogeneity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 4.3 Resistance characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.3.1 Experimental results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.3.2 Equivalent-circuit development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 4.4 Impedance spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 4.4.1 Measurement fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 4.4.2 Thickness dependence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 4.4.3 Temperature dependence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 4.5 Depletion zone variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 4.6 Molybdenum oxide as a case study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 5 Charge-carrier transport and self-heating in OLED lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101 5.1 Joule self-heating in OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.1.1 Electrothermal feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.1.2 Thermistors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 5.1.3 Cooling strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 5.2 Self-heating causes lateral luminance inhomogeneities in OLEDs . . 108 5.2.1 The influence of transparent electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 5.2.2 Luminance inhomogeneities in large OLED panels . . . . . . 110 5.3 Electrothermal OLED models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 5.3.1 Perceiving an OLED as thermistor array . . . . . . . . . . . 112 5.3.2 The OLED as a single three-layer thermistor . . . . . . . . . 114 5.3.3 A numerical 3D model of heat and current flow . . . . . . . 116 5.4 OLED stack and experimental conception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 5.5 The Switch-back effect in planar light sources . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 5.5.1 Predictions from numerical 3D modeling . . . . . . . . . . . 121 5.5.2 Experimental proof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 5.5.3 Variation of vertical heat flux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 5.5.4 Variation of the OLED area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 5.6 Electrothermal tristabilities in OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 5.6.1 Observing different burn-in schematics . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 5.6.2 Bistability and tristability in organic semiconductors . . . . 134 5.6.3 Experimental indications for attempted branch hopping . . . 138 5.6.4 Saving bright OLEDs from burning in . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 5.6.5 Taking another view onto the camera pictures . . . . . . . . 145 6 Charge-carrier recombination and exciton management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .147 6.1 Optical down conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 6.1.1 Spectral reshaping of visible OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 6.1.2 Infrared-emitting OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 6.2 Dual-state Förster transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 6.2.1 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 6.2.2 Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 6.3 Singlet fission and triplet fusion in rubrene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 6.3.1 Photoluminescence of pure and doped rubrene films . . . . . 163 6.3.2 Electroluminescence transients of rubrene OLEDs . . . . . . 172 6.4 Charge transfer-state tuning by electric fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 6.4.1 CT-state tuning via doping variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 6.4.2 CT-state tuning via voltage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 6.5 Excursus: Exciton-spin mixing for wavelength identification . . . . 183 6.5.1 Characteristics of the active film . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 6.5.2 Conception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 6.5.3 Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 6.5.4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 6.5.5 Application demonstrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 6.5.6 All-organic device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 6.5.7 Device limitations and prospects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 7 Conclusion and outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 7.1 Charge-carrier injection into doped films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 7.2 Charge-carrier transport in hot OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 7.2.1 Prospects for OLED lighting facing tristable behavior . . . . 209 7.2.2 Outlook: Accessing the hidden PDR 2 region . . . . . . . . . 210 7.3 Charge-carrier recombination and spin mixing . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 7.3.1 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 7.3.2 Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249Wer sich heute für ein neues Mobiltelefon entscheidet, kauft damit wahrscheinlich einen Bildschirm aus organischen Leuchtdioden (OLEDs). Durch ihre brillanten Farben, die hohe erreichbare Auflösung und eine vergleichsweise einfache Prozessierung werden OLEDs als relativ neue Bildschirmtechnologie in den nächsten Jahren wohl den größten Marktanteil ausmachen. Da sie nicht auf der starren Kristallstruktur klassischer Halbleiter beruhen und als planare Dünnschichtmodule produziert werden können, ermöglichen sie außerdem die Fertigung großer Flächenstrahler auf flexiblen Substraten – ein sehr attraktives Szenario für zukünftige Beleuchtungssysteme. Trotz dieser vielversprechenden Eigenschaften steht der Durchbruch der OLED-Technologie als Leuchtmittel noch aus und erfordert weitere Forschung. Die Dynamik der Ladungsträger (Elektronen und Löcher) in einer OLED charakterisiert wichtige Teile der Bauteilfunktion und ermöglicht daher das Verständnis grundlegender physikalischer Konzepte und Phänomene. Diese Arbeit leitet anhand dieser Beschreibung experimentelle Methoden und Bauteilkonzepte ab, um die Effizienz und Stabilität von OLEDs zu optimieren. OLEDs zeichnen sich dadurch aus, dass ein elektrischer Strom aus Ladungsträgern (Elektronen und Löchern) möglichst effizient unter Aussendung von Licht rekombiniert. Diesem Prozess geht eine Ladungsträgerinjektion und deren Transport zur Emissionsschicht voraus. Diese drei Aspekte werden in dieser Arbeit zusammenhängend diskutiert. Als erstes wird eine Methode vorgestellt, die Injektionswiderstände anhand eines einfachen Experimentes quantifiziert. Sie bildet eine wertvolle Möglichkeit, Injektionsschichten besser zu verstehen und zu optimieren. Anschließend wird der Ladungsträgertransport bei hohen elektrischen Strömen untersucht, wie sie für OLEDs als helle Beleuchtungselemente nötig sind. Hier werden elektro-thermische Effekte vorgestellt, die physikalische Grenzen für das Design und die Funktion von OLED Modulen bilden und deren plötzliches Versagen erklären. Abschließend wird die Dynamik der stark elektrostatisch gebundenen Ladungsträgerpaare, sogenannter Exzitonen, kurz vor deren Rekombination untersucht. Es werden verschiedene Möglichkeiten vorgestellt sie so zu manipulieren, dass sich das Abstrahlverhalten der OLED anhand bestimmter Anforderungen einstellen lässt.:List of publications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v List of abbreviations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix 1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 Fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1 Light sources and the human society . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.1.1 Human light perception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.1.2 Physical light quantification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1.3 Non-visual light impact . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.1.4 Implications for modern light sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.2 Organic semiconductors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.2.1 Molecular energy states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.2 Intramolecular state transitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 2.2.3 Molecular films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 2.2.4 Electrical doping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.2.5 Charge-carrier transport . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.2.6 Exciton formation and recombination . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 2.2.7 Exciton transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 2.3 Organic light-emitting diodes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 2.3.1 Structure and operation principle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 2.3.2 Metal-semiconductor interfaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 2.3.3 Typical operation characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 2.4 Colloidal nanocrystal emitters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 2.4.1 Terminology: Nanocrystals and quantum dots . . . . . . . . 52 2.4.2 The particle-in-a-box model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 2.4.3 Surface passivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3 Materials and methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.1 Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.1.1 OLED materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 3.1.2 Materials for photoluminescence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 3.2 Sample preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 3.2.1 Thermal evaporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 3.2.2 Solution processing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 3.3 Spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.3.1 Absorbance spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.3.2 Photoluminescence quantum yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 3.3.3 Excitation sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 3.3.4 Sensitive EQE for absorber materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 3.4 Exciton-lifetime analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 3.4.1 Triplet lifetime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 3.4.2 Singlet-state lifetime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 3.4.3 Lifetime extraction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 3.5 OLED characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 3.5.1 Current-voltage-luminance and quantum efficiency . . . . . . 73 3.5.2 Temperature-controlled evaluation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 4 Charge-carrier injection into doped organic films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 4.1 Ohmic injection contacts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 4.2 Device architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.2.1 Conception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.2.2 Device symmetry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 4.2.3 Device homogeneity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 4.3 Resistance characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.3.1 Experimental results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 4.3.2 Equivalent-circuit development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 4.4 Impedance spectroscopy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 4.4.1 Measurement fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 4.4.2 Thickness dependence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 4.4.3 Temperature dependence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 4.5 Depletion zone variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 4.6 Molybdenum oxide as a case study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 5 Charge-carrier transport and self-heating in OLED lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .101 5.1 Joule self-heating in OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.1.1 Electrothermal feedback . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 5.1.2 Thermistors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 5.1.3 Cooling strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 5.2 Self-heating causes lateral luminance inhomogeneities in OLEDs . . 108 5.2.1 The influence of transparent electrodes . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 5.2.2 Luminance inhomogeneities in large OLED panels . . . . . . 110 5.3 Electrothermal OLED models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 5.3.1 Perceiving an OLED as thermistor array . . . . . . . . . . . 112 5.3.2 The OLED as a single three-layer thermistor . . . . . . . . . 114 5.3.3 A numerical 3D model of heat and current flow . . . . . . . 116 5.4 OLED stack and experimental conception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 5.5 The Switch-back effect in planar light sources . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 5.5.1 Predictions from numerical 3D modeling . . . . . . . . . . . 121 5.5.2 Experimental proof . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 5.5.3 Variation of vertical heat flux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 5.5.4 Variation of the OLED area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 5.6 Electrothermal tristabilities in OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 5.6.1 Observing different burn-in schematics . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 5.6.2 Bistability and tristability in organic semiconductors . . . . 134 5.6.3 Experimental indications for attempted branch hopping . . . 138 5.6.4 Saving bright OLEDs from burning in . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 5.6.5 Taking another view onto the camera pictures . . . . . . . . 145 6 Charge-carrier recombination and exciton management . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .147 6.1 Optical down conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 6.1.1 Spectral reshaping of visible OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 6.1.2 Infrared-emitting OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 6.2 Dual-state Förster transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 6.2.1 Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 6.2.2 Verification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 6.3 Singlet fission and triplet fusion in rubrene . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 6.3.1 Photoluminescence of pure and doped rubrene films . . . . . 163 6.3.2 Electroluminescence transients of rubrene OLEDs . . . . . . 172 6.4 Charge transfer-state tuning by electric fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 6.4.1 CT-state tuning via doping variation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 6.4.2 CT-state tuning via voltage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 6.5 Excursus: Exciton-spin mixing for wavelength identification . . . . 183 6.5.1 Characteristics of the active film . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 6.5.2 Conception . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186 6.5.3 Setup . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187 6.5.4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 6.5.5 Application demonstrations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 6.5.6 All-organic device . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 6.5.7 Device limitations and prospects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198 7 Conclusion and outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 7.1 Charge-carrier injection into doped films . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207 7.2 Charge-carrier transport in hot OLEDs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 7.2.1 Prospects for OLED lighting facing tristable behavior . . . . 209 7.2.2 Outlook: Accessing the hidden PDR 2 region . . . . . . . . . 210 7.3 Charge-carrier recombination and spin mixing . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 7.3.1 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 7.3.2 Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211 Bibliography. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

Two-dimensional electronic transport in rubrene: the impact of inter-chain coupling

Organic semi-conductors have unique electronic properties and are important systems both at the fundamental level and also for their applications in electronic devices. In this article we focus on the particular case of rubrene which has one of the best electronic transport properties for application purposes. We show that this system can be well simulated by simple tight-binding systems representing one-dimensional (1D) chains that are weakly coupled to their neighboring chains in the same plane. This makes in principle this rubrene system somehow intermediate between 1D and isotropic 2D models. We analyse in detail the dc-transport and terahertz conductivity in the 1D and in the anisotropic 2D models. The transient localisation scenario allows us to reproduce satisfactorily some basics results such as mobility anisotropy and orders of magnitude as well as ac-conductivity in the terahertz range. This model shows in particular that even a weak inter-chain coupling is able to improve notably the propagation along the chains. This suggest also that a strong inter-chain coupling is important to get organic semi-conductors with the best possible transport properties for applicative purposes.Comment: 21 pages, 17 figure

Modification of Graphene for Applications in Optoelectronic Devices

Submitted by Gareth Francis Jones to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics.In this thesis, we investigate how the optical and electronic properties of graphene may be modified in proximity to various other materials. We present several examples of how modification in this way can help make graphene better suited for specific device applications. We develop a method of up-scaling the fabrication of FeCl3-intercalated few-layer graphene from micron-sized flakes to macroscopic films so that it may be used as a transparent electrode in flexible light-emitting devices. We also find that photo-responsive junctions can be arbitrarily written into FeCl3-intercalated few-layer graphene by means of optical lithography. These junctions produce photocurrent signals that are directly proportional to incident optical power over an extended range compared to other graphene photodetectors. Through theoretical analysis of these junctions, we conclude that the enhanced cooling of hot carriers with lattice phonons is responsible for this behaviour. Finally, we trial rubrene single crystals as the light-absorbing layer in a graphene phototransistor. We find that rubrene single crystal-graphene interfaces exhibit enhanced charge transfer efficiencies under illumination with extremely weak light signals. Through a comparative study with similar devices, we conclude that the wide variation in sensitivity amongst graphene phototransistors is largely due to extraneous factors relating to device geometry and measurement conditions.Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilRoyal Societ

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationIn this work, we focused on the magnetic field effect in organic films and devices, including organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) and organic photovoltaic (OPV) cells. We measured magnetic field effect (MFE) such as magnetoconductance (MC) and magneto-electroluminescence (MEL) in OLEDs based on several π-conjugated polymers and small molecules for fields B∼2mT. Magnetic field effect (MFE) measured on three isotopes of Poly (dioctyloxy) phenylenevinylene (DOO-PPV) showed that both regular and ultra-small effects are isotope dependent. This indicates that MFE response in OLED is mainly due to the hyperfine interaction (HFI). We also performed spectroscopy of the MFE including magneto-photoinduced absorption (MPA) and magneto-photoluminescence (MPL) at steady state conditions in several systems. This includes pristine Poly[2-methoxy-5-(2-ethylhexyl-oxy)-1,4-phenylene-vinylene] (MEH-PPV) films, MEH-PPV films subjected to prolonged illumination, and MEH-PPV/[6,6]-Phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) blend, as well as annealed and pristine C60 thin films. For comparison, we also measured MC and MEL in organic diodes based on the same materials. By directly comparing the MPA and MPL responses in films to MC and MEL in organic diodes based on the same active layers, we are able to relate the MFE in organic diodes to the spin densities of the excitations formed in the device, regardless of whether they are formed by photon absorption or carrier injection from the electrodes. We also studied magneto-photocurrent (MPC) and power conversion efficiency (PCE) of a 'standard' Poly (3-hexylthiophene)/PCBM device at various Galvinoxyl radical wt%. We found that the MPC reduction with Galvinoxyl wt% follows the same trend as that of the PCE enhancement. In addition, we also measured the MPC response of a series of OPV cells. We attribute the observed broad MPC to short-lived charge transfer complex species, where spin mixing is caused by the difference, Δg of the donor/acceptor g factors; whereas narrow MPC is due to HFI within long-lived polaron-pairs

Magnetic Field Dependent Electroluminescence and Charge Transport in Organic Semiconductors

It has been found that a small magnetic field (\u3c300 mT) can substantial change the electroluminescence, photoluminescence, photocurrent, electrical injection current in nonmagnetic organic semiconductors. It is generally believed that these magnetic field effects (MFE) are related to the spin dependent processes in organic semiconductor. However, the origin of MFE is still not well understood. In this dissertation, we investigate the underlying mechanism for magnetic field effects on electroluminescence (MFEEL) and magnetoresistance (MR) and demonstrate the complete tuning of MFEEL and MR based on our theoretical understanding. We consider MFE arising from magnetic field sensitive intersystem crossing (ISC) and triplet charge reaction. Magnetic field can increase the singlet ratios through ISC, accounting for positive MFEEL. Magnetic field modulated ISC strongly depends on the electron-hole pair separation distance. MFE can be enhanced by increasing the electron hole pair distance through material mixing and interplaying the electric dipole-dipole interaction. Meanwhile, two possible mechanisms corresponding for negative MFEEL: triplet-triplet annihilation and triplet charge reaction are also discussed. The negative MFEEL is achieved through adjusting triplet density charge confinement and exciton/charge ratio, which indicates that triplet charge reaction is a dominate process accountable for negative MFEEL. Significant MR and MFEEL are observed in strong spin orbital coupling iridium complex based OLED device after introducing the non-magnetic insulating blocking PVA layer. A possible mechanism for this new interface induced MR and MFEEL is proposed based on magnetic field perturbed spin-spin interaction at short capture distance of inter-charge carriers. The comparative study of two strong spin orbital coupling materials Ir(ppy)3 and Ir(ppy)2(acac) with different electrical dipole moments indicate the electric dipole-dipole interaction can change MR and MFEEL from short distance capture based regime to long distance intersystem-crossing regime. At last, we demonstrate the fully tuning sign of magnetic field effect on the fluorescence (MFEFEL) and phosphorescence (MFEPEL) by using the ISC, energy transfer and spin-spin interaction. In addition, we demonstrate a giant MFEEL (400%) in electrochemical cells and attribute this giant MFEEL to Lorentz force driven ion transport and Lorentz force dependent diffusion layer thickness through convection

Electroluminescent devices based on polymeric thin films

This thesis is concerned with the preparation of organic light-emitting diodes (LEDs) by using different thin film technologies: the Langmuir-Blodgett (LB) technique; spin-coating and thermal evaporation. The π-conjugated polymer, poly(2-methoxy-5-(5'-ethylhexyloxy)-p-phenylenevinylene) (MEH-PPV), was used as the emissive layer and was deposited onto patterned indium-tin oxide (ITO) glass using the LB technique or spin-coating. Y-type LB films of MEH-PPV were deposited at a surface pressure of 17 mN m(^-1) with a transfer ratio of 0.95 ± 0.03. Many efforts were made to improve the LB film device performance parameters, such as external quantum efficiency and operating lifetime, by inserting an electron transporting or insulating layer between the emissive layer and top cathode. Annealing the LB films was found to result in an improved operating lifetime. LEDs based on spun films possessed higher external quantum efficiencies than devices made from LB films. The more ordered LB films had a higher probability of intra- and intermolecular interactions and formed more excimer states within the structure. This led to a lower quantum efficiency compared to devices incorporating spun films. The operating lifetime of the LEDs was highly dependent on the morphology of the film surface. A smoother film surface is required for a longer device operating lifetime. A new electron transporting material, 2,5-bis[2-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,3,4-oxadiazol-5-yl]pyridine (PDPyDP), was deposited on top of the MEH-PPV spun film. Despite a high external quantum efficiency of 0.7 %, this device suffered from dark regions in the electroluminescence output resulting in degradation of the device. The dark area formation was attributed to delamination of the aluminium electrode from the PDPyDP layer, which was lessened by: (a) annealing the degraded devices; (b) evaporating a thicker aluminium layer at a high rate and (c) inserting a buffer layer (Alq(_3)) between the PDPyDP and the Al top electrode