56 research outputs found
On equivalence, languages equivalence and minimization of multi-letter and multi-letter measure-many quantum automata
We first show that given a -letter quantum finite automata
and a -letter quantum finite automata over
the same input alphabet , they are equivalent if and only if they are
-equivalent where , , are the
numbers of state in respectively, and . By
applying a method, due to the author, used to deal with the equivalence problem
of {\it measure many one-way quantum finite automata}, we also show that a
-letter measure many quantum finite automaton and a
-letter measure many quantum finite automaton are
equivalent if and only if they are -equivalent
where , , are the numbers of state in respectively,
and .
Next, we study the language equivalence problem of those two kinds of quantum
finite automata. We show that for -letter quantum finite automata, the
non-strict cut-point language equivalence problem is undecidable, i.e., it is
undecidable whether
where
and are -letter quantum finite automata.
Further, we show that both strict and non-strict cut-point language equivalence
problem for -letter measure many quantum finite automata are undecidable.
The direct consequences of the above outcomes are summarized in the paper.
Finally, we comment on existing proofs about the minimization problem of one
way quantum finite automata not only because we have been showing great
interest in this kind of problem, which is very important in classical automata
theory, but also due to that the problem itself, personally, is a challenge.
This problem actually remains open.Comment: 30 pages, conclusion section correcte
Quantum Pushdown Automata
Quantum finite automata, as well as quantum pushdown automata (QPA) were
first introduced by C. Moore and J. P. Crutchfield. In this paper we introduce
the notion of QPA in a non-equivalent way, including unitarity criteria, by
using the definition of quantum finite automata of Kondacs and Watrous. It is
established that the unitarity criteria of QPA are not equivalent to the
corresponding unitarity criteria of quantum Turing machines. We show that QPA
can recognize every regular language. Finally we present some simple languages
recognized by QPA, not recognizable by deterministic pushdown automata.Comment: Conference SOFSEM 2000, extended version of the pape
Turing machines based on unsharp quantum logic
In this paper, we consider Turing machines based on unsharp quantum logic.
For a lattice-ordered quantum multiple-valued (MV) algebra E, we introduce
E-valued non-deterministic Turing machines (ENTMs) and E-valued deterministic
Turing machines (EDTMs). We discuss different E-valued recursively enumerable
languages from width-first and depth-first recognition. We find that
width-first recognition is equal to or less than depth-first recognition in
general. The equivalence requires an underlying E value lattice to degenerate
into an MV algebra. We also study variants of ENTMs. ENTMs with a classical
initial state and ENTMs with a classical final state have the same power as
ENTMs with quantum initial and final states. In particular, the latter can be
simulated by ENTMs with classical transitions under a certain condition. Using
these findings, we prove that ENTMs are not equivalent to EDTMs and that ENTMs
are more powerful than EDTMs. This is a notable difference from the classical
Turing machines.Comment: In Proceedings QPL 2011, arXiv:1210.029
Another approach to the equivalence of measure-many one-way quantum finite automata and its application
In this paper, we present a much simpler, direct and elegant approach to the
equivalence problem of {\it measure many one-way quantum finite automata}
(MM-1QFAs). The approach is essentially generalized from the work of Carlyle
[J. Math. Anal. Appl. 7 (1963) 167-175]. Namely, we reduce the equivalence
problem of MM-1QFAs to that of two (initial) vectors.
As an application of the approach, we utilize it to address the equivalence
problem of {\it Enhanced one-way quantum finite automata} (E-1QFAs) introduced
by Nayak [Proceedings of the 40th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of
Computer Science, 1999, pp.~369-376]. We prove that two E-1QFAs
and over are equivalence if and only if they are
-equivalent where and are the numbers of states in
and , respectively.Comment: V 10: Corollary 3 is deleted, since it is folk. (V 9: Revised in
terms of the referees's comments) All comments, especially the linguistic
comments, are welcom
Finite state verifiers with constant randomness
We give a new characterization of as the class of languages
whose members have certificates that can be verified with small error in
polynomial time by finite state machines that use a constant number of random
bits, as opposed to its conventional description in terms of deterministic
logarithmic-space verifiers. It turns out that allowing two-way interaction
with the prover does not change the class of verifiable languages, and that no
polynomially bounded amount of randomness is useful for constant-memory
computers when used as language recognizers, or public-coin verifiers. A
corollary of our main result is that the class of outcome problems
corresponding to O(log n)-space bounded games of incomplete information where
the universal player is allowed a constant number of moves equals NL.Comment: 17 pages. An improved versio
- …