29,788 research outputs found
Measuring Membership Privacy on Aggregate Location Time-Series
While location data is extremely valuable for various applications,
disclosing it prompts serious threats to individuals' privacy. To limit such
concerns, organizations often provide analysts with aggregate time-series that
indicate, e.g., how many people are in a location at a time interval, rather
than raw individual traces. In this paper, we perform a measurement study to
understand Membership Inference Attacks (MIAs) on aggregate location
time-series, where an adversary tries to infer whether a specific user
contributed to the aggregates.
We find that the volume of contributed data, as well as the regularity and
particularity of users' mobility patterns, play a crucial role in the attack's
success. We experiment with a wide range of defenses based on generalization,
hiding, and perturbation, and evaluate their ability to thwart the attack
vis-a-vis the utility loss they introduce for various mobility analytics tasks.
Our results show that some defenses fail across the board, while others work
for specific tasks on aggregate location time-series. For instance, suppressing
small counts can be used for ranking hotspots, data generalization for
forecasting traffic, hotspot discovery, and map inference, while sampling is
effective for location labeling and anomaly detection when the dataset is
sparse. Differentially private techniques provide reasonable accuracy only in
very specific settings, e.g., discovering hotspots and forecasting their
traffic, and more so when using weaker privacy notions like crowd-blending
privacy. Overall, our measurements show that there does not exist a unique
generic defense that can preserve the utility of the analytics for arbitrary
applications, and provide useful insights regarding the disclosure of sanitized
aggregate location time-series
Problematising upstream technology through speculative design: the case of quantified cats and dogs
There is growing interest in technology that quantifies aspects of our lives. This paper draws on critical practice and speculative design to explore, question and problematise the ultimate consequences of such technology using the quantification of companion animals (pets) as a case study. We apply the concept of âmoving upstreamâ to study such technology and use a qualitative research approach in which both pet owners, and animal behavioural experts, were presented with, and asked to discuss, speculative designs for pet quantification applications, the design of which were extrapolated from contemporary trends. Our findings indicate a strong desire among pet owners for technology that has little scientific justification, whilst our experts caution that the use of technology to augment human-animal communication has the potential to disimprove animal welfare, undermine human-animal bonds, and create human-human conflicts. Our discussion informs wider debates regarding quantification technology
A Comparison of Spatial-based Targeted Disease Containment Strategies using Mobile Phone Data
Epidemic outbreaks are an important healthcare challenge, especially in
developing countries where they represent one of the major causes of mortality.
Approaches that can rapidly target subpopulations for surveillance and control
are critical for enhancing containment processes during epidemics.
Using a real-world dataset from Ivory Coast, this work presents an attempt to
unveil the socio-geographical heterogeneity of disease transmission dynamics.
By employing a spatially explicit meta-population epidemic model derived from
mobile phone Call Detail Records (CDRs), we investigate how the differences in
mobility patterns may affect the course of a realistic infectious disease
outbreak. We consider different existing measures of the spatial dimension of
human mobility and interactions, and we analyse their relevance in identifying
the highest risk sub-population of individuals, as the best candidates for
isolation countermeasures. The approaches presented in this paper provide
further evidence that mobile phone data can be effectively exploited to
facilitate our understanding of individuals' spatial behaviour and its
relationship with the risk of infectious diseases' contagion. In particular, we
show that CDRs-based indicators of individuals' spatial activities and
interactions hold promise for gaining insight of contagion heterogeneity and
thus for developing containment strategies to support decision-making during
country-level pandemics
Dynamic assessment of exposure to air pollution using mobile phone data
Background: Exposure to air pollution can have major health impacts, such as respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Traditionally, only the air pollution concentration at the home location is taken into account in health impact assessments and epidemiological studies. Neglecting individual travel patterns can lead to a bias in air pollution exposure assessments.
Methods: In this work, we present a novel approach to calculate the daily exposure to air pollution using mobile phone data of approximately 5 million mobile phone users living in Belgium. At present, this data is collected and stored by telecom operators mainly for management of the mobile network. Yet it represents a major source of information in the study of human mobility. We calculate the exposure to NO2 using two approaches: assuming people stay at home the entire day (traditional static approach), and incorporating individual travel patterns using their location inferred from their use of the mobile phone network (dynamic approach).
Results: The mean exposure to NO2 increases with 1.27 mu g/m(3) (4.3 %) during the week and with 0.12 mu g/m(3) (0.4 %) during the weekend when incorporating individual travel patterns. During the week, mostly people living in municipalities surrounding larger cities experience the highest increase in NO2 exposure when incorporating their travel patterns, probably because most of them work in these larger cities with higher NO2 concentrations.
Conclusions: It is relevant for health impact assessments and epidemiological studies to incorporate individual travel patterns in estimating air pollution exposure. Mobile phone data is a promising data source to determine individual travel patterns, because of the advantages (e.g. low costs, large sample size, passive data collection) compared to travel surveys, GPS, and smartphone data (i.e. data captured by applications on smartphones)
- âŠ