793 research outputs found
Qualitative Logics and Equivalences for Probabilistic Systems
We investigate logics and equivalence relations that capture the qualitative
behavior of Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). We present Qualitative Randomized
CTL (QRCTL): formulas of this logic can express the fact that certain temporal
properties hold over all paths, or with probability 0 or 1, but they do not
distinguish among intermediate probability values. We present a symbolic,
polynomial time model-checking algorithm for QRCTL on MDPs.
The logic QRCTL induces an equivalence relation over states of an MDP that we
call qualitative equivalence: informally, two states are qualitatively
equivalent if the sets of formulas that hold with probability 0 or 1 at the two
states are the same. We show that for finite alternating MDPs, where
nondeterministic and probabilistic choices occur in different states,
qualitative equivalence coincides with alternating bisimulation, and can thus
be computed via efficient partition-refinement algorithms. On the other hand,
in non-alternating MDPs the equivalence relations cannot be computed via
partition-refinement algorithms, but rather, they require non-local
computation. Finally, we consider QRCTL*, that extends QRCTL with nested
temporal operators in the same manner in which CTL* extends CTL. We show that
QRCTL and QRCTL* induce the same qualitative equivalence on alternating MDPs,
while on non-alternating MDPs, the equivalence arising from QRCTL* can be
strictly finer. We also provide a full characterization of the relation between
qualitative equivalence, bisimulation, and alternating bisimulation, according
to whether the MDPs are finite, and to whether their transition relations are
finitely-branching.Comment: The paper is accepted for LMC
Recommended from our members
Logics of Imprecise Comparative Probability
This paper studies connections between two alternatives to the standard probability calculus for representing and reasoning about uncertainty: imprecise probability andcomparative probability. The goal is to identify complete logics for reasoning about uncertainty in a comparative probabilistic language whose semantics is given in terms of imprecise probability. Comparative probability operators are interpreted as quantifying over a set of probability measures. Modal and dynamic operators are added for reasoning about epistemic possibility and updating sets of probability measures
Modelling default and likelihood reasoning as probabilistic
A probabilistic analysis of plausible reasoning about defaults and about likelihood is presented. 'Likely' and 'by default' are in fact treated as duals in the same sense as 'possibility' and 'necessity'. To model these four forms probabilistically, a logic QDP and its quantitative counterpart DP are derived that allow qualitative and corresponding quantitative reasoning. Consistency and consequence results for subsets of the logics are given that require at most a quadratic number of satisfiability tests in the underlying propositional logic. The quantitative logic shows how to track the propagation error inherent in these reasoning forms. The methodology and sound framework of the system highlights their approximate nature, the dualities, and the need for complementary reasoning about relevance
Model checking Quantitative Linear Time Logic
This paper considers QLtl, a quantitative analagon of Ltl and presents algorithms for model checking QLtl over quantitative versions of Kripke structures and Markov chains
Hennessy-Milner Theorems via Galois Connections
We introduce a general and compositional, yet simple, framework that allows to derive soundness and expressiveness results for modal logics characterizing behavioural equivalences or metrics (also known as Hennessy-Milner theorems). It is based on Galois connections between sets of (real-valued) predicates on the one hand and equivalence relations/metrics on the other hand and covers a part of the linear-time-branching-time spectrum, both for the qualitative case (behavioural equivalences) and the quantitative case (behavioural metrics). We derive behaviour functions from a given logic and give a condition, called compatibility, that characterizes under which conditions a logically induced equivalence/metric is induced by a fixpoint equation. In particular, this framework allows to derive a new fixpoint characterization of directed trace metrics
Unwinding biological systems
Unwinding conditions have been fruitfully exploited in Information Flow Security to define persistent security properties. In this paper we investigate their meaning and possible uses in the analysis of biological systems. In particular, we elaborate on the notion of robustness and propose some instances of unwinding over the process algebra Bio-PEPA and over hybrid automata. We exploit such instances to analyse two case-studies: Neurospora crassa circadian system and Influenza kinetics models
- …