HEDCOS: High Efficiency Dynamic Combinatorial Optimization System using Ant Colony Optimization algorithm

This thesis was submitted for the award of Doctor of Philosophy and was awarded by Brunel University LondonDynamic combinatorial optimization is gaining popularity among industrial practitioners due to the ever-increasing scale of their optimization problems and efforts to solve them to remain competitive. Larger optimization problems are not only more computationally intense to optimize but also have more uncertainty within problem inputs. If some aspects of the problem are subject to dynamic change, it becomes a Dynamic Optimization Problem (DOP). In this thesis, a High Efficiency Dynamic Combinatorial Optimization System is built to solve challenging DOPs with high-quality solutions. The system is created using Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) baseline algorithm with three novel developments. First, introduced an extension method for ACO algorithm called Dynamic Impact. Dynamic Impact is designed to improve convergence and solution quality by solving challenging optimization problems with a non-linear relationship between resource consumption and fitness. This proposed method is tested against the real-world Microchip Manufacturing Plant Production Floor Optimization (MMPPFO) problem and the theoretical benchmark Multidimensional Knapsack Problem (MKP). Second, a non-stochastic dataset generation method was introduced to solve the dynamic optimization research replicability problem. This method uses a static benchmark dataset as a starting point and source of entropy to generate a sequence of dynamic states. Then using this method, 1405 Dynamic Multidimensional Knapsack Problem (DMKP) benchmark datasets were generated and published using famous static MKP benchmark instances as the initial state. Third, introduced a nature-inspired discrete dynamic optimization strategy for ACO by modelling real-world ants’ symbiotic relationship with aphids. ACO with Aphids strategy is designed to solve discrete domain DOPs with event-triggered discrete dynamism. The strategy improved inter-state convergence by allowing better solution recovery after dynamic environment changes. Aphids mediate the information from previous dynamic optimization states to maximize initial results performance and minimize the impact on convergence speed. This strategy is tested for DMKP and against identical ACO implementations using Full-Restart and Pheromone-Sharing strategies, with all other variables isolated. Overall, Dynamic Impact and ACO with Aphids developments are compounding. Using Dynamic Impact on single objective optimization of MMPPFO, the fitness value was improved by 33.2% over the ACO algorithm without Dynamic Impact. MKP benchmark instances of low complexity have been solved to a 100% success rate even when a high degree of solution sparseness is observed, and large complexity instances have shown the average gap improved by 4.26 times. ACO with Aphids has also demonstrated superior performance over the Pheromone-Sharing strategy in every test on average gap reduced by 29.2% for a total compounded dynamic optimization performance improvement of 6.02 times. Also, ACO with Aphids has outperformed the Full-Restart strategy for large datasets groups, and the overall average gap is reduced by 52.5% for a total compounded dynamic optimization performance improvement of 8.99 times

Customized Pull Systems for Single-Product Flow Lines

Traditionally pull production systems are managed through classic control systems such as Kanban, Conwip, or Base stock, but this paper proposes ‘customized’ pull control. Customization means that a given production line is managed through a pull control system that in principle connects each stage of that line with each preceding stage; optimization of the corresponding simulation model, however, shows which of these potential control loops are actually implemented. This novel approach may result in one of the classic systems, but it may also be another type: (1) the total line may be decomposed into several segments, each with its own classic control system (e.g., segment 1 with Kanban, segment 2 with Conwip); (2) the total line or segments may combine different classic systems; (3) the line may be controlled through a new type of system. These different pull systems are found when applying the new approach to a set of twelve production lines. These lines are configured through the application of a statistical (Plackett-Burman) design with ten factors that characterize production lines (such as line length, demand variability, and machine breakdowns).Pull production / inventory;sampling;optimization;evolutionary algorithm

A General Two-Step Approach to Learning-Based Hashing

Most existing approaches to hashing apply a single form of hash function, and an optimization process which is typically deeply coupled to this specific form. This tight coupling restricts the flexibility of the method to respond to the data, and can result in complex optimization problems that are difficult to solve. Here we propose a flexible yet simple framework that is able to accommodate different types of loss functions and hash functions. This framework allows a number of existing approaches to hashing to be placed in context, and simplifies the development of new problem-specific hashing methods. Our framework decomposes hashing learning problem into two steps: hash bit learning and hash function learning based on the learned bits. The first step can typically be formulated as binary quadratic problems, and the second step can be accomplished by training standard binary classifiers. Both problems have been extensively studied in the literature. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed framework is effective, flexible and outperforms the state-of-the-art.Comment: 13 pages. Appearing in Int. Conf. Computer Vision (ICCV) 201