3,001 research outputs found
Pseudorandom Generators for Width-3 Branching Programs
We construct pseudorandom generators of seed length that -fool ordered read-once branching programs
(ROBPs) of width and length . For unordered ROBPs, we construct
pseudorandom generators with seed length . This is the first improvement for pseudorandom
generators fooling width ROBPs since the work of Nisan [Combinatorica,
1992].
Our constructions are based on the `iterated milder restrictions' approach of
Gopalan et al. [FOCS, 2012] (which further extends the Ajtai-Wigderson
framework [FOCS, 1985]), combined with the INW-generator [STOC, 1994] at the
last step (as analyzed by Braverman et al. [SICOMP, 2014]). For the unordered
case, we combine iterated milder restrictions with the generator of
Chattopadhyay et al. [CCC, 2018].
Two conceptual ideas that play an important role in our analysis are: (1) A
relabeling technique allowing us to analyze a relabeled version of the given
branching program, which turns out to be much easier. (2) Treating the number
of colliding layers in a branching program as a progress measure and showing
that it reduces significantly under pseudorandom restrictions.
In addition, we achieve nearly optimal seed-length
for the classes of: (1) read-once polynomials on
variables, (2) locally-monotone ROBPs of length and width
(generalizing read-once CNFs and DNFs), and (3) constant-width ROBPs of length
having a layer of width in every consecutive
layers.Comment: 51 page
Better Pseudorandom Generators from Milder Pseudorandom Restrictions
We present an iterative approach to constructing pseudorandom generators,
based on the repeated application of mild pseudorandom restrictions. We use
this template to construct pseudorandom generators for combinatorial rectangles
and read-once CNFs and a hitting set generator for width-3 branching programs,
all of which achieve near-optimal seed-length even in the low-error regime: We
get seed-length O(log (n/epsilon)) for error epsilon. Previously, only
constructions with seed-length O(\log^{3/2} n) or O(\log^2 n) were known for
these classes with polynomially small error.
The (pseudo)random restrictions we use are milder than those typically used
for proving circuit lower bounds in that we only set a constant fraction of the
bits at a time. While such restrictions do not simplify the functions
drastically, we show that they can be derandomized using small-bias spaces.Comment: To appear in FOCS 201
Improved Pseudorandom Generators from Pseudorandom Multi-Switching Lemmas
We give the best known pseudorandom generators for two touchstone classes in
unconditional derandomization: an -PRG for the class of size-
depth- circuits with seed length , and an -PRG for the class of -sparse
polynomials with seed length . These results bring the state of the art for
unconditional derandomization of these classes into sharp alignment with the
state of the art for computational hardness for all parameter settings:
improving on the seed lengths of either PRG would require breakthrough progress
on longstanding and notorious circuit lower bounds.
The key enabling ingredient in our approach is a new \emph{pseudorandom
multi-switching lemma}. We derandomize recently-developed
\emph{multi}-switching lemmas, which are powerful generalizations of
H{\aa}stad's switching lemma that deal with \emph{families} of depth-two
circuits. Our pseudorandom multi-switching lemma---a randomness-efficient
algorithm for sampling restrictions that simultaneously simplify all circuits
in a family---achieves the parameters obtained by the (full randomness)
multi-switching lemmas of Impagliazzo, Matthews, and Paturi [IMP12] and
H{\aa}stad [H{\aa}s14]. This optimality of our derandomization translates into
the optimality (given current circuit lower bounds) of our PRGs for
and sparse polynomials
Algorithms and lower bounds for de Morgan formulas of low-communication leaf gates
The class consists of Boolean functions
computable by size- de Morgan formulas whose leaves are any Boolean
functions from a class . We give lower bounds and (SAT, Learning,
and PRG) algorithms for , for classes
of functions with low communication complexity. Let
be the maximum -party NOF randomized communication
complexity of . We show:
(1) The Generalized Inner Product function cannot be computed in
on more than fraction of inputs
for As a corollary, we get an average-case lower bound for
against .
(2) There is a PRG of seed length that -fools . For
, we get the better seed length . This gives the first
non-trivial PRG (with seed length ) for intersections of half-spaces
in the regime where .
(3) There is a randomized -time SAT algorithm for , where In particular, this implies a nontrivial
#SAT algorithm for .
(4) The Minimum Circuit Size Problem is not in .
On the algorithmic side, we show that can be
PAC-learned in time
- …