2,205 research outputs found

    Trends in template/fragment-free protein structure prediction

    Get PDF
    Predicting the structure of a protein from its amino acid sequence is a long-standing unsolved problem in computational biology. Its solution would be of both fundamental and practical importance as the gap between the number of known sequences and the number of experimentally solved structures widens rapidly. Currently, the most successful approaches are based on fragment/template reassembly. Lacking progress in template-free structure prediction calls for novel ideas and approaches. This article reviews trends in the development of physical and specific knowledge-based energy functions as well as sampling techniques for fragment-free structure prediction. Recent physical- and knowledge-based studies demonstrated that it is possible to sample and predict highly accurate protein structures without borrowing native fragments from known protein structures. These emerging approaches with fully flexible sampling have the potential to move the field forward

    Mass & secondary structure propensity of amino acids explain their mutability and evolutionary replacements

    Get PDF
    Why is an amino acid replacement in a protein accepted during evolution? The answer given by bioinformatics relies on the frequency of change of each amino acid by another one and the propensity of each to remain unchanged. We propose that these replacement rules are recoverable from the secondary structural trends of amino acids. A distance measure between high-resolution Ramachandran distributions reveals that structurally similar residues coincide with those found in substitution matrices such as BLOSUM: Asn Asp, Phe Tyr, Lys Arg, Gln Glu, Ile Val, Met → Leu; with Ala, Cys, His, Gly, Ser, Pro, and Thr, as structurally idiosyncratic residues. We also found a high average correlation (\overline{R} R = 0.85) between thirty amino acid mutability scales and the mutational inertia (I X ), which measures the energetic cost weighted by the number of observations at the most probable amino acid conformation. These results indicate that amino acid substitutions follow two optimally-efficient principles: (a) amino acids interchangeability privileges their secondary structural similarity, and (b) the amino acid mutability depends directly on its biosynthetic energy cost, and inversely with its frequency. These two principles are the underlying rules governing the observed amino acid substitutions. © 2017 The Author(s)

    Serverification of Molecular Modeling Applications: the Rosetta Online Server that Includes Everyone (ROSIE)

    Get PDF
    The Rosetta molecular modeling software package provides experimentally tested and rapidly evolving tools for the 3D structure prediction and high-resolution design of proteins, nucleic acids, and a growing number of non-natural polymers. Despite its free availability to academic users and improving documentation, use of Rosetta has largely remained confined to developers and their immediate collaborators due to the code's difficulty of use, the requirement for large computational resources, and the unavailability of servers for most of the Rosetta applications. Here, we present a unified web framework for Rosetta applications called ROSIE (Rosetta Online Server that Includes Everyone). ROSIE provides (a) a common user interface for Rosetta protocols, (b) a stable application programming interface for developers to add additional protocols, (c) a flexible back-end to allow leveraging of computer cluster resources shared by RosettaCommons member institutions, and (d) centralized administration by the RosettaCommons to ensure continuous maintenance. This paper describes the ROSIE server infrastructure, a step-by-step 'serverification' protocol for use by Rosetta developers, and the deployment of the first nine ROSIE applications by six separate developer teams: Docking, RNA de novo, ERRASER, Antibody, Sequence Tolerance, Supercharge, Beta peptide design, NCBB design, and VIP redesign. As illustrated by the number and diversity of these applications, ROSIE offers a general and speedy paradigm for serverification of Rosetta applications that incurs negligible cost to developers and lowers barriers to Rosetta use for the broader biological community. ROSIE is available at http://rosie.rosettacommons.org

    Computational protein design: assessment and applications

    Get PDF
    Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)Computational protein design aims at designing amino acid sequences that can fold into a target structure and perform a desired function. Many computational design methods have been developed and their applications have been successful during past two decades. However, the success rate of protein design remains too low to be of a useful tool by biochemists whom are not an expert of computational biology. In this dissertation, we first developed novel computational assessment techniques to assess several state-of-the-art computational techniques. We found that significant progresses were made in several important measures by two new scoring functions from RosettaDesign and from OSCAR-design, respectively. We also developed the first machine-learning technique called SPIN that predicts a sequence profile compatible to a given structure with a novel nonlocal energy-based feature. The accuracy of predicted sequences is comparable to RosettaDesign in term of sequence identity to wild type sequences. In the last two application chapters, we have designed self-inhibitory peptides of Escherichia coli methionine aminopeptidase (EcMetAP) and de novo designed barstar. Several peptides were confirmed inhibition of EcMetAP at the micromole-range 50% inhibitory concentration. Meanwhile, the assessment of designed barstar sequences indicates the improvement of OSCAR-design over RosettaDesign

    RNA and protein 3D structure modeling: similarities and differences

    Get PDF
    In analogy to proteins, the function of RNA depends on its structure and dynamics, which are encoded in the linear sequence. While there are numerous methods for computational prediction of protein 3D structure from sequence, there have been very few such methods for RNA. This review discusses template-based and template-free approaches for macromolecular structure prediction, with special emphasis on comparison between the already tried-and-tested methods for protein structure modeling and the very recently developed “protein-like” modeling methods for RNA. We highlight analogies between many successful methods for modeling of these two types of biological macromolecules and argue that RNA 3D structure can be modeled using “protein-like” methodology. We also highlight the areas where the differences between RNA and proteins require the development of RNA-specific solutions

    Interplay of I‐TASSER and QUARK for template‐based and ab initio protein structure prediction in CASP10

    Full text link
    We develop and test a new pipeline in CASP10 to predict protein structures based on an interplay of I‐TASSER and QUARK for both free‐modeling (FM) and template‐based modeling (TBM) targets. The most noteworthy observation is that sorting through the threading template pool using the QUARK‐based ab initio models as probes allows the detection of distant‐homology templates which might be ignored by the traditional sequence profile‐based threading alignment algorithms. Further template assembly refinement by I‐TASSER resulted in successful folding of two medium‐sized FM targets with >150 residues. For TBM, the multiple threading alignments from LOMETS are, for the first time, incorporated into the ab initio QUARK simulations, which were further refined by I‐TASSER assembly refinement. Compared with the traditional threading assembly refinement procedures, the inclusion of the threading‐constrained ab initio folding models can consistently improve the quality of the full‐length models as assessed by the GDT‐HA and hydrogen‐bonding scores. Despite the success, significant challenges still exist in domain boundary prediction and consistent folding of medium‐size proteins (especially beta‐proteins) for nonhomologous targets. Further developments of sensitive fold‐recognition and ab initio folding methods are critical for solving these problems. Proteins 2014; 82(Suppl 2):175–187. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102666/1/prot24341-sup-0001-suppinfo.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102666/2/prot24341.pd
    corecore