An investigation on skeleton-based top-down modelling approaches of complex industrial product

In industry, today's approach to assembly design is still largely based on a bottom-up approach which, in contrast with the most advanced top-down techniques, is unfit to deal with very large and complex products. The reason for this lies in the high number of relationships to be established between parts and in the lack of a high-level control of the assembly design. This makes the management of design changes a labor-intensive process and the capture of design intent difficult to achieve. The paper, referring to the most advanced research fields of Concurrent Engineering and Knowledge-Based Engineering, focuses on a top-down modelling approach based on skeleton, which constitutes the most natural but still scarcely exploited way to attain a high reactivity to design modifications. Through the application of suitable methodologies, such as that one for a SKeLeton geometry-based Assembly Context Definition (SKL-ACD), the skeleton is also able to capture and codify assembly process engineering information since the early phases of the product development process. With the purpose of promoting the knowledge of these skeleton-based modelling techniques, that have a great relevance for training professional, technical and mechanical engineers, this paper implements the SKL-ACD methodology to an industrial case study in order to identify, with a unique and repeatable workflow, the reference geometrical entities and the mutual relationships to embed into the product skeleton. The skeleton types and the related fields of use are also described, placing particular emphasis on problems or shortcomings still not resolved, especially in consideration of the need to assist the designer in defining the impact of a parameter on assembly modification and in avoiding loops while defining formulas. A new tool, in the form of a multilayer graph, is finally proposed that is able to display and differentiate clearly the formulas, the design parameters and the impact of their modification on skeleton entities and members of the assembly

Understanding Open Versus Proprietary Research and Innovation: A Case Study of Canada's Pharmaceutical Sector

With decreasing public funding for scientific research and innovation (R&I) in Canada, the onus has fallen on public research institutions strategically partner with industry to ensure that research generates innovative socio-economic gains. As a result, R&D has become more prescribed and more restricted, as private contracts and other proprietary intellectual property (IP) mechanisms regulate and often limit avenues of inquiry. This push towards commercialization has extended upstream into the process of research itself, and is not limited solely to product development (Mirowski and Van Horn, 2005). In response to the restraints on R&I imposed by commercialization and proprietary IP measures, concepts of open science and innovation have become increasingly prominent, particularly in discussions of pharmaceutical development. The push towards openness in R&I has offered a potential solution to navigating through complex networks of proprietary IP licenses and patents, primarily by releasing project data into the public domain and ensuring broad user access, expanding participation in R&I, and reducing commercial barriers (Gitter, 2013; Feldman & Nelson, 2008). While open science initiatives offer low entry costs and increased methodological transparency, there is significant debate within the STS and innovation studies literature regarding the role of open and proprietary IP in R&I. While some, such as Lezuan and Montgomery (2015), argue proprietary mechanisms are necessary for collaboration and provide incentives for investing in research, others, such as Mirowski (2011), highlight the aforementioned roadblocks to innovation and collaboration brought about proprietary IP. In both cases, open and proprietary mechanisms are often presented as dichotomous and incompatible. This dissertation builds on the argument that, contrary to this dichotomy presented in current STS scholarship, these open and proprietary mechanisms may be complimentary at particular stages of R&I. I extend my focus to intermediary organizations established to facilitate the translation of basic research into marketable pharmaceutical products, in addition to public research institutes, small- to medium-sized private pharmaceutical firms, and incubator labs in Toronto. In doing so, this research aims to unpack how these mechanisms operate in the R&I process, as well as their role in facilitating or hindering collaboration and pharmaceutical R&I more broadly

Technological capability building through networking strategies within high-tech industries

technological, networking, strategies, high-tech industries

Ohjelmistojen välinen tiedonvälitys tietokoneavusteisessa suunnittelussa

The growing number of computer aided design software suites used in the engineering processes of heavy industry. Recently, communicating information between these software suites has gained more interest. Duplication of data for each software separately creates risk of quality issues as well as slows the product development cycles. The aim of this thesis was to identify the best method for software communication between PTC Creo and Autodesk Revit. Based on the gaps identified in the existing methods, a custom solution prototype was developed to better understand the quality of the existing methods. This custom solution prototype was compared with the existing methods using established engineering design methodology. This thesis found the custom solution prototype to be the best method for software communication between the software suites in question. The custom solution prototype scored 79.2% of the maximum with the best existing method only achieving a score of 72.9%. The higher evaluation can be attributed especially to the high integrability and low cost of the custom solution compared to existing methods. Owning the solution also enables achieving a competitive edge.Raskas teollisuus hyödyntää kasvavissa määrin erilaisia suunnitteluohjelmistoja osana suunnitteluprosessejaan. Ohjelmistojen kasvava määrä on lisännyt kiinnostusta tiedon sujuvaan välittämiseen näiden ohjelmistojen välillä. Tiedon kahdentaminen erikseen jokaista ohjelmistoa varten lisää laatuvirheiden riskiä ja hidastaa tuotekehityssyklejä. Tämän työn tarkoitus oli tunnistaa paras mahdollinen menetelmä tiedon välittämiseen PTC Creon ja Autodesk Revitin välillä. Olemassa olevien menetelmien puutteista johtuen osana työtä tuotettiin oma menetelmäprototyyppi. Tätä menetelmäprototyyppiä verrattiin olemassa oleviin menetelmiin käyttäen vakiintuneita suunnittelumenetelmiä. Oma menetelmäprototyyppi paljastui vertailussa parhaaksi menetelmäksi tiedon välittämiseen ohjelmistosta toiseen. Oma menetelmäprototyyppi sai pisteitä 79,2 % maksimista lähimmän olemassa olevan menetelmän jäädessä 72,9 % maksimipisteistä. Prototyypin saama korkeampi pistemäärä voidaan yhdistää erityisesti hyvään yhdistettävyyteen muihin järjestelmiin sekä menetelmän matalaan kustannukseen. Tiedonvälitysmenetelmän omistajuus antaa myös mahdollisuuden saavuttaa kilpailuetua

State of Play V Primers

August 19-22,2007 at Marina Mandarin Hotel 6 Raffles Boulevard Marina Square Singapore 039594 Presented by: Institute for Information Law and Policy New York Law School The Berkman Center for Internet & Society Harvard Law School Nanyang Technological University Trinity University Information Society Project Yale Law Schoolhttps://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/iilp/1123/thumbnail.jp

Copyrighting the Past? Emerging Intellectual Property Rights Issues in Archaeology1

Rights to intellectual property have become a major issue in eth- nobotany and many other realms of research involving Indige- nous communities. This paper examines intellectual-property- rights-related issues in archaeology, including the relevance of such rights within the discipline, the forms these rights take, and the impacts of applying intellectual property protection in archaeology. It identifies the “products” of archaeological re- search and what they represent in a contemporary sociocultural context, examines ownership issues, assesses the level of protec- tion of these products provided by existing legislation, and dis- cusses the potential of current intellectual property protection mechanisms to augment cultural heritage protection for Indige- nous communities

Call preparation documents: Guide for Applicants, Model Contract, Proposal Template, Call text, and publication plan for the call

Project HORSE, co-funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under agreement No 680734, foresees as an eligible activity the provision of financial support to third parties, as means to achieve its own objectives. The HORSE framework is driven by and validated with end-users - manufacturing companies- in two steps: in the first, the framework was jointly developed together with the selected end-users (Pilot Experiments); in the second, its suitability and transferability to further applications will be validated with new end-users recruited via this Open Call

Human Computer Interaction and Emerging Technologies

The INTERACT Conferences are an important platform for researchers and practitioners in the field of human-computer interaction (HCI) to showcase their work. They are organised biennially by the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) Technical Committee on Human–Computer Interaction (IFIP TC13), an international committee of 30 member national societies and nine Working Groups. INTERACT is truly international in its spirit and has attracted researchers from several countries and cultures. With an emphasis on inclusiveness, it works to lower the barriers that prevent people in developing countries from participating in conferences. As a multidisciplinary field, HCI requires interaction and discussion among diverse people with different interests and backgrounds. The 17th IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2019) took place during 2-6 September 2019 in Paphos, Cyprus. The conference was held at the Coral Beach Hotel Resort, and was co-sponsored by the Cyprus University of Technology and Tallinn University, in cooperation with ACM and ACM SIGCHI. This volume contains the Adjunct Proceedings to the 17th INTERACT Conference, comprising a series of selected papers from workshops, the Student Design Consortium and the Doctoral Consortium. The volume follows the INTERACT conference tradition of submitting adjunct papers after the main publication deadline, to be published by a University Press with a connection to the conference itself. In this case, both the Adjunct Proceedings Chair of the conference, Dr Usashi Chatterjee, and the lead Editor of this volume, Dr Fernando Loizides, work at Cardiff University which is the home of Cardiff University Press