12,191 research outputs found
Generalised Compositional Theories and Diagrammatic Reasoning
This chapter provides an introduction to the use of diagrammatic language, or
perhaps more accurately, diagrammatic calculus, in quantum information and
quantum foundations. We illustrate the use of diagrammatic calculus in one
particular case, namely the study of complementarity and non-locality, two
fundamental concepts of quantum theory whose relationship we explore in later
part of this chapter.
The diagrammatic calculus that we are concerned with here is not merely an
illustrative tool, but it has both (i) a conceptual physical backbone, which
allows it to act as a foundation for diverse physical theories, and (ii) a
genuine mathematical underpinning, permitting one to relate it to standard
mathematical structures.Comment: To appear as a Springer book chapter chapter, edited by G.
Chirabella, R. Spekken
Generalizing Boolean Satisfiability I: Background and Survey of Existing Work
This is the first of three planned papers describing ZAP, a satisfiability
engine that substantially generalizes existing tools while retaining the
performance characteristics of modern high-performance solvers. The fundamental
idea underlying ZAP is that many problems passed to such engines contain rich
internal structure that is obscured by the Boolean representation used; our
goal is to define a representation in which this structure is apparent and can
easily be exploited to improve computational performance. This paper is a
survey of the work underlying ZAP, and discusses previous attempts to improve
the performance of the Davis-Putnam-Logemann-Loveland algorithm by exploiting
the structure of the problem being solved. We examine existing ideas including
extensions of the Boolean language to allow cardinality constraints,
pseudo-Boolean representations, symmetry, and a limited form of quantification.
While this paper is intended as a survey, our research results are contained in
the two subsequent articles, with the theoretical structure of ZAP described in
the second paper in this series, and ZAP's implementation described in the
third
MCMAS-SLK: A Model Checker for the Verification of Strategy Logic Specifications
We introduce MCMAS-SLK, a BDD-based model checker for the verification of
systems against specifications expressed in a novel, epistemic variant of
strategy logic. We give syntax and semantics of the specification language and
introduce a labelling algorithm for epistemic and strategy logic modalities. We
provide details of the checker which can also be used for synthesising agents'
strategies so that a specification is satisfied by the system. We evaluate the
efficiency of the implementation by discussing the results obtained for the
dining cryptographers protocol and a variant of the cake-cutting problem
Discounting in LTL
In recent years, there is growing need and interest in formalizing and
reasoning about the quality of software and hardware systems. As opposed to
traditional verification, where one handles the question of whether a system
satisfies, or not, a given specification, reasoning about quality addresses the
question of \emph{how well} the system satisfies the specification. One
direction in this effort is to refine the "eventually" operators of temporal
logic to {\em discounting operators}: the satisfaction value of a specification
is a value in , where the longer it takes to fulfill eventuality
requirements, the smaller the satisfaction value is.
In this paper we introduce an augmentation by discounting of Linear Temporal
Logic (LTL), and study it, as well as its combination with propositional
quality operators. We show that one can augment LTL with an arbitrary set of
discounting functions, while preserving the decidability of the model-checking
problem. Further augmenting the logic with unary propositional quality
operators preserves decidability, whereas adding an average-operator makes some
problems undecidable. We also discuss the complexity of the problem, as well as
various extensions
- …