200 research outputs found
Multiwinner Voting with Fairness Constraints
Multiwinner voting rules are used to select a small representative subset of
candidates or items from a larger set given the preferences of voters. However,
if candidates have sensitive attributes such as gender or ethnicity (when
selecting a committee), or specified types such as political leaning (when
selecting a subset of news items), an algorithm that chooses a subset by
optimizing a multiwinner voting rule may be unbalanced in its selection -- it
may under or over represent a particular gender or political orientation in the
examples above. We introduce an algorithmic framework for multiwinner voting
problems when there is an additional requirement that the selected subset
should be "fair" with respect to a given set of attributes. Our framework
provides the flexibility to (1) specify fairness with respect to multiple,
non-disjoint attributes (e.g., ethnicity and gender) and (2) specify a score
function. We study the computational complexity of this constrained multiwinner
voting problem for monotone and submodular score functions and present several
approximation algorithms and matching hardness of approximation results for
various attribute group structure and types of score functions. We also present
simulations that suggest that adding fairness constraints may not affect the
scores significantly when compared to the unconstrained case.Comment: The conference version of this paper appears in IJCAI-ECAI 201
A Framework for Approval-based Budgeting Methods
We define and study a general framework for approval-based budgeting methods
and compare certain methods within this framework by their axiomatic and
computational properties. Furthermore, we visualize their behavior on certain
Euclidean distributions and analyze them experimentally
Multiwinner Analogues of Plurality Rule: Axiomatic and Algorithmic Perspectives
We characterize the class of committee scoring rules that satisfy the
fixed-majority criterion. In some sense, the committee scoring rules in this
class are multiwinner analogues of the single-winner Plurality rule, which is
uniquely characterized as the only single-winner scoring rule that satisfies
the simple majority criterion. We define top--counting committee scoring
rules and show that the fixed majority consistent rules are a subclass of the
top--counting rules. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for a
top--counting rule to satisfy the fixed-majority criterion. We find that,
for most of the rules in our new class, the complexity of winner determination
is high (that is, the problem of computing the winners is NP-hard), but we also
show examples of rules with polynomial-time winner determination procedures.
For some of the computationally hard rules, we provide either exact FPT
algorithms or approximate polynomial-time algorithms
Approval-Based Shortlisting
Shortlisting is the task of reducing a long list of alternatives to a
(smaller) set of best or most suitable alternatives from which a final winner
will be chosen. Shortlisting is often used in the nomination process of awards
or in recommender systems to display featured objects. In this paper, we
analyze shortlisting methods that are based on approval data, a common type of
preferences. Furthermore, we assume that the size of the shortlist, i.e., the
number of best or most suitable alternatives, is not fixed but determined by
the shortlisting method. We axiomatically analyze established and new
shortlisting methods and complement this analysis with an experimental
evaluation based on biased voters and noisy quality estimates. Our results lead
to recommendations which shortlisting methods to use, depending on the desired
properties
- …