The undecidability of simultaneous rigid E-unification with two variables

Abstract. Recently it was proved that the problem of simultaneous rigid E-unification, or SREU, is undecidable. Here we show that 4 rigid equations with ground left-hand sides and 2 variables already imply undecidability. As a corollary we improve the undecidability result of the 3*-fragment of intuitionistic logic with equality. Our proof shows undecidability of a very restricted subset of the 33-fragment. Together with other results, it contributes to a complete characterization of decidability of the prenex fragment of intuitionistic logic with equality, in terms of the quantifier prefix. 1 I n t r o d u c t i o n Recently it was proved that the problem of simultaneous rigid E-unification (SREU) is undecidable Background of S R E U Simultaneous rigid E-unification was proposed by Ga~er, Raatz and Snyder 1 It has been noted by Gurevich and Veanes that 3 rigid equations suffice

On the Proof Theory of Regular Fixed Points

International audienceWe consider encoding finite automata as least fixed points in a proof theoretical framework equipped with a general induction scheme, and study automata inclusion in that setting. We provide a coinductive characterization of inclusion that yields a natural bridge to proof-theory. This leads us to generalize these observations to regular formulas, obtaining new insights about inductive theorem proving and cyclic proofs in particular

Proceedings of the Workshop on the lambda-Prolog Programming Language

The expressiveness of logic programs can be greatly increased over first-order Horn clauses through a stronger emphasis on logical connectives and by admitting various forms of higher-order quantification. The logic of hereditary Harrop formulas and the notion of uniform proof have been developed to provide a foundation for more expressive logic programming languages. The λ-Prolog language is actively being developed on top of these foundational considerations. The rich logical foundations of λ-Prolog provides it with declarative approaches to modular programming, hypothetical reasoning, higher-order programming, polymorphic typing, and meta-programming. These aspects of λ-Prolog have made it valuable as a higher-level language for the specification and implementation of programs in numerous areas, including natural language, automated reasoning, program transformation, and databases

Proof-theoretic Semantics for Intuitionistic Multiplicative Linear Logic

This work is the first exploration of proof-theoretic semantics for a substructural logic. It focuses on the base-extension semantics (B-eS) for intuitionistic multiplicative linear logic (IMLL). The starting point is a review of Sandqvist’s B-eS for intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL), for which we propose an alternative treatment of conjunction that takes the form of the generalized elimination rule for the connective. The resulting semantics is shown to be sound and complete. This motivates our main contribution, a B-eS for IMLL , in which the definitions of the logical constants all take the form of their elimination rule and for which soundness and completeness are established

The use of proof plans in tactic synthesis

We undertake a programme of tactic synthesis. We first formalize the notion of a tactic as a rewrite rule, then give a correctness criterion for this by means of a reflection mechanism in the constructive type theory OYSTER. We further formalize the notion of a tactic specification, given as a synthesis goal and a decidability goal. We use a proof planner. CIAM. to guide the search for inductive proofs of these, and are able to successfully synthesize several tactics in this fashion. This involves two extensions to existing methods: context-sensitive rewriting and higher-order wave rules. Further, we show that from a proof of the decidability goal one may compile to a Prolog program a pseudo- tactic which may be run to efficiently simulate the input/output behaviour of the synthetic tacti