242 research outputs found
Proof complexity of intuitionistic implicational formulas
Abstract We study implicational formulas in the context of proof complexity of intuitionistic propositional logic (IPC). On the one hand, we give an efficient transformation of tautologies to implicational tautologies that preserves the lengths of intuitionistic extended Frege (EF ) or substitution Frege (SF ) proofs up to a polynomial. On the other hand, EF proofs in the implicational fragment of IPC polynomially simulate full intuitionistic logic for implicational tautologies. The results also apply to other fragments of other superintuitionistic logics under certain conditions. In particular, the exponential lower bounds on the length of intuitionistic EF proofs by Hrubeš [9], generalized to exponential separation between EF and SF systems in superintuitionistic logics of unbounded branching by Jeřábe
Propositional Logics Complexity and the Sub-Formula Property
In 1979 Richard Statman proved, using proof-theory, that the purely
implicational fragment of Intuitionistic Logic (M-imply) is PSPACE-complete. He
showed a polynomially bounded translation from full Intuitionistic
Propositional Logic into its implicational fragment. By the PSPACE-completeness
of S4, proved by Ladner, and the Goedel translation from S4 into Intuitionistic
Logic, the PSPACE- completeness of M-imply is drawn. The sub-formula principle
for a deductive system for a logic L states that whenever F1,...,Fk proves A,
there is a proof in which each formula occurrence is either a sub-formula of A
or of some of Fi. In this work we extend Statman result and show that any
propositional (possibly modal) structural logic satisfying a particular
formulation of the sub-formula principle is in PSPACE. If the logic includes
the minimal purely implicational logic then it is PSPACE-complete. As a
consequence, EXPTIME-complete propositional logics, such as PDL and the
common-knowledge epistemic logic with at least 2 agents satisfy this particular
sub-formula principle, if and only if, PSPACE=EXPTIME. We also show how our
technique can be used to prove that any finitely many-valued logic has the set
of its tautologies in PSPACE.Comment: In Proceedings DCM 2014, arXiv:1504.0192
Computer-Aided Discovery and Categorisation of Personality Axioms
We propose a computer-algebraic, order-theoretic framework based on
intuitionistic logic for the computer-aided discovery of personality axioms
from personality-test data and their mathematical categorisation into formal
personality theories in the spirit of F.~Klein's Erlanger Programm for
geometrical theories. As a result, formal personality theories can be
automatically generated, diagrammatically visualised, and mathematically
characterised in terms of categories of invariant-preserving transformations in
the sense of Klein and category theory. Our personality theories and categories
are induced by implicational invariants that are ground instances of
intuitionistic implication, which we postulate as axioms. In our mindset, the
essence of personality, and thus mental health and illness, is its invariance.
The truth of these axioms is algorithmically extracted from histories of
partially-ordered, symbolic data of observed behaviour. The personality-test
data and the personality theories are related by a Galois-connection in our
framework. As data format, we adopt the format of the symbolic values generated
by the Szondi-test, a personality test based on L.~Szondi's unifying,
depth-psychological theory of fate analysis.Comment: related to arXiv:1403.200
Intuitionistic implication makes model checking hard
We investigate the complexity of the model checking problem for
intuitionistic and modal propositional logics over transitive Kripke models.
More specific, we consider intuitionistic logic IPC, basic propositional logic
BPL, formal propositional logic FPL, and Jankov's logic KC. We show that the
model checking problem is P-complete for the implicational fragments of all
these intuitionistic logics. For BPL and FPL we reach P-hardness even on the
implicational fragment with only one variable. The same hardness results are
obtained for the strictly implicational fragments of their modal companions.
Moreover, we investigate whether formulas with less variables and additional
connectives make model checking easier. Whereas for variable free formulas
outside of the implicational fragment, FPL model checking is shown to be in
LOGCFL, the problem remains P-complete for BPL.Comment: 29 pages, 10 figure
A simplified lower bound for implicational logic
We present a streamlined and simplified exponential lower bound on the length
of proofs in intuitionistic implicational logic, adapted to Gordeev and
Haeusler's dag-like natural deduction.Comment: 31 page
The model checking problem for intuitionistic propositional logic with one variable is AC1-complete
We show that the model checking problem for intuitionistic propositional
logic with one variable is complete for logspace-uniform AC1. As basic tool we
use the connection between intuitionistic logic and Heyting algebra, and
investigate its complexity theoretical aspects. For superintuitionistic logics
with one variable, we obtain NC1-completeness for the model checking problem.Comment: A preliminary version of this work was presented at STACS 2011. 19
pages, 3 figure
- …