105 research outputs found
Ă chaque saint sa chandelle. Pour un calendrier ludique
In addition to a saint's biography which establishes his or her power to heal people or save them from danger, the saint's attributes are also inscribed phonetically in his or her name. Thus, Saint Marguerite is linked to childbirth because she came from the belly of a dragon, but also because the term guĂ©rit [heals] is inescapably and forever inscribed in her name. This article, which is an offshoot of research for the Dictionnaire des locutions en moyen français, examines in alphabetical order the process of lexical creation in the names of approximately one hundred real or imaginary popular saints.RĂ©sumĂ©Au delĂ du trait biographique d'oĂč un saint tire son pouvoir de guĂ©rir ou de sauver d'un danger, sa qualitĂ© est aussi inscrite phonĂ©tiquement dans son nom. Ainsi, on lie sainte Marguerite Ă l'enfantement car elle est sortie du ventre du dragon, mais en mĂȘme temps le terme guĂ©rit est inscrit d'une maniĂšre stable et incontournable dans son nom. Cet article, fruit d'une enquĂȘte menĂ©e en marge du Dictionnaire des locutions en moyen français, examine le processus de crĂ©ation verbale dans le nom d'une centaine de saints populaires, rĂ©els ou imaginaires, prĂ©sentĂ©s par ordre alphabĂ©tique
Mumpsimus and Sumpsimus : the intellectual origins of a Henrician bon mot
Henry VIII's appearance before the assembled houses of parliament on Christmas Eve 1545 was perhaps his finest hour. In what has been called a âpioneer royal Christmas broadcastâ, the king delivered an impassioned and eloquent speech lamenting the religious divisions that afflicted his kingdom, and urging his subjects towards unity and charity. 1 According to William Petre, the king himself wept as he recounted how âcharity between man and man is so refrigerateâ, and few of his audience could restrain themselves from doing likewise. 2 Another eye-witness, the chronicler Edward Hall, wrote down the speech âworde for worde, as near as I was able to report itâ. This account gives details of how Henry illustrated the breakdown of fraternal love among his people: âthe one calleth the other Hereticke and Anabaptist, and he calleth hym again, Papist, Yypocrite and Phariseyâ; rival preachers inveighed against each other âwithout charity or discrecionâ. To the king's mind, the blame for this deserved to be apportioned to all sides, and, to reinforce the point, Henry brought forward one of the more curious metaphors of contemporary religious discourse: âsome be to styff in their old Mumpsimus, other be to busy and curious in their newe Sumpsimusâ. 3
Recent historians of the reign have understandably devoted considerable attention to his speech, arguably the most famous of all Henry VIII's public pronouncements, and most have quoted the mumpsimusâsumpsimus idiom, with varying degrees of wry amusement. 4 Yet there has been little attempt to explain why the king should use precisely these words to epitomise the polarisation of religious positions in the early 1540s. 5 It is not always apparent from modern accounts that the terms âmumpsimusâ and âsumpsimusâ did not represent the king's own assay at faux-bucolic neologism, but were an established (though not long-established) literary trope. In the following short discussion, I hope to demonstrate how an investigation of the derivation and precedents of the phraseology employed by Henry in his Christmas speech can throw some revealing light on the processes by which religious typologies were constructed and utilised in the course of the Henrician Reformation, as well as providing some points of orientation in that most formidable of terrae incognitae, the mind of Henry VIII himself. 6
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnotes
1 The phrase is Diarmaid MacCulloch's: Thomas Cranmer: a life, New HavenâLondon 1996, 348.
2 PRO, SP 1/212, fos 110vâ11r (Letters and papers, foreign and domestic, of the reign of Henry VIII, ed. J. S. Brewer, J. Gairdner and R. H. Brodie, London 1862â1910 [hereinafter cited as LP], xx/2, 1030).
3 E. Hall, Hall's Chronicle, ed. H. Ellis, London 1809, 864â5. The charge of religious name-calling was hardly new in 1545. In an earlier exhortation to unity and charity, Thomas Starkey had lamented the fact that âeche one in hart iugeth other to be eyther pharisee or heretyke, papist or schismatikeâ: An exhortation to the people instructynge them to unitie and obedience, London ?1536, fo. 27v.
4 J. J. Scarisbrick, Henry VIII, London 1968, 470â1; S. E. Lehmberg, The later parliaments of Henry VIII 1536â1547, Cambridge 1977, 229â31; S. Brigden, London and the Reformation, Oxford 1989, 378; G. R. Elton, England under the Tudors, 3rd edn, London 1991, 200; C. Haigh, English reformations: religion, politics, and society under the Tudors, Oxford 1993, 164; R. Rex, Henry VIII and the English Reformation, Basingstoke 1993, 172; MacCulloch, Cranmer, 348; G. W. Bernard, âThe making of religious policy, 1533â1546: Henry VIII and the search for the middle wayâ, Historical Journal xli (1998), 348.
5 The exception here is Lehmberg, Later parliaments, 231, which notes that the phrase was derived from a 1517 treatise by Richard Pace. As I shall show, this does not give the complete picture.
6 For two recent stimulating, though contrasting, attempts to locate Henry's religious centre of gravity see Bernard, âThe making of religious policyâ; D. MacCulloch, âHenry VIII and the reform of the Churchâ, in D. MacCulloch (ed.), The reign of Henry VIII: politics, policy and piety, Basingstoke 1995, 159â80
Construire la norme des métiers de santé au Parlement de Paris (xive-début du xvie siÚcle)
Comment les procĂšs engagĂ©s Ă la fin du Moyen Ăge par les mĂ©decins, les chirurgiens et les barbiers parisiens contre des thĂ©rapeutes sans reconnaissance officielle transforment-ils lâordre social des mondes de santĂ© et renforcent-ils les mĂ©tiers en formation ? Croiser lâĂ©tude des sources de la pratique judiciaire du Parlement de Paris et celle des sources normatives permet de dĂ©gager quelques pistes dâanalyse. Ă lâoccasion des procĂ©dures engagĂ©es devant le Parlement, les praticiens rĂ©guliers sont mis Ă lâĂ©preuve par les avocats de leurs adversaires qui dĂ©veloppent un discours alternatif sur les normes sociales de santĂ©, et dĂ©fendent une interprĂ©tation du droit qui leur est favorable. ConfrontĂ©s aux irrĂ©guliers et Ă leurs revendications, les praticiens rĂ©guliers profitent de lâarĂšne judiciaire pour renforcer leur autoritĂ© par un travail de communication sur la discipline des pratiques de santĂ© et sur la loi du roi ; ils contribuent aussi au renforcement de leur contrĂŽle des pratiques en mobilisant les potentialitĂ©s rĂ©glementaires du Parlement. Le processus de dispute est dĂšs lors un moment crucial dâĂ©laboration des normes de comportement et dâajustement de la norme juridique aux demandes sociales des communautĂ©s « professionnelles » en formation.How did legal proceedings brought by Parisian physicians, surgeons and barbers against unrecognised healers at the end of the Middle Ages change the field of health practices and reinforce the developing « professional » communities ? The study of judicial sources, the registers of the Paris Parlement, combined with the study of normative sources enables us to single out avenues of reflection. On the occasion of proceedings at the Parlement, the lawyers of the unauthorized practitioners elaborate alternative discourses about health-related social norms and advocate for an interpretation of the law that may be beneficial to them. In these ordeals, recognised practitioners take the opportunity of the judicial arena to strengthen their authority by imposing their discipline in the field of health and the kingâs law. They contribute to the reinforcement of their control of the practices by using the regulatory power of the Parlement. The disputing process provides key moments to promote standards of behaviour and to adapt legal norm to the social demands from « professional » communities in the process of defining themselves
Investigating connections among reading, writing, and language development: A multiliteracies perspective
This study explores relationships among reading literature, creative writing, and language development in a university-level advanced French grammar course through the theoretical lens of the multiliteracies framework. The goal is to investigate reading-writing connections and whether these literacy practices facilitate studentsâ understanding and use of resources such as grammar, vocabulary, genre, and style. Qualitative and quantitative findings show that students recognize reading-writing connections and their contribution to language development; they perceive reading and writing as contributing to their understanding of language and text-based features; and they can apply to varying degrees textual resources learned through reading to creative writing tasks. The implications of these findings lend support to a growing body of research that explores the feasibility and outcomes of literacy-based approaches to teaching and learning in university-level foreign language contexts that have as their goal development of studentsâ advanced foreign language competencies
Montaigne et ses reprĂ©sentations : un « gibier » pour lâhistorien ?
Cette communication analyse les usages critiques que lâhistorien peut faire de Montaigne. AprĂšs avoir prĂ©sentĂ© les Ă©lĂ©ments qui font des Ă©crits montaigniens un ensemble de sources idĂ©ales, lâarticle se centre sur la mobilisation de ces textes par des travaux relevant de lâhistoire culturelle (histoire des mentalitĂ©s puis histoire des reprĂ©sentations). Sont exposĂ©s les Ă©cueils auxquels se trouve confrontĂ© lâhistorien qui sâappuie sur Montaigne ainsi que les conclusions auxquelles il peut parvenir.In this article I define and analyze the historianâs critical understanding of Montaigne. After presenting various elements that transform Montaigneâs writings into a set of ideal sources, I then focus on the application of these texts in the fields of cultural history, history of mentalities, and finally history of representations. The pitfalls that historians find themselves facing when addressing Montaigne in this way are exposed, along with the conclusions they can reach
Un recueil de 1626, comprenant trois ouvrages en rapport avec la thématique du temps
DerniĂšre page du premier ouvrage et page de titre du second. ClichĂ© Jean-Pierre Rosenkranz Cette rĂ©union de trois livrets produits par un mĂȘme imprimeur strasbourgeois, tous trois en rapport avec la thĂ©matique du temps, a quelque chose dâexceptionnel. Il sâagit, au moins pour deux dâentre eux, de documents de caractĂšre Ă©phĂ©mĂšre, issus des presses de Marx van der Heyden, imprimeur actif Ă Strasbourg de 1616 Ă 1637 auprĂšs des graveurs Jacob et Isaac van der Heyden. Le premier est un calendrier..
Michel Nostradamus: el triunfo del verso jeroglĂfico
ProducciĂłn CientĂficaCada pocos años aparece alguien anunciando el definitivo
fin del mundo. La Ășltima ocasiĂłn, para los agoreros, ha sido el
pasado 2012, apoyada en una denominada profecĂa maya,
que, ella sĂ, ha conseguido ascender a la Nada.
Aunque quizĂĄs sea precipitado decir que la profecĂa maya
haya desaparecido para siempre, porque una de las propiedades
mĂĄs notables de vaticinadores y futurĂłlogos es la capacidad
de reinterpretar. Viven de lo inconcreto y la esencia de la
profecĂa es, precisamente, la imponderabilidad y la posibilidad
de multi-interpretaciĂłn que ofrece a hombres y mujeres, letrados
e iletrados.
Profetizar es presumir de que se sabe lo que va a pasar en
el futuro y no se entiende muy bien por qué todos los profetizadores
hablan en lenguaje hermético, en el del gran Hermes
Trismegisto, que Enrique Jardiel Poncela traducĂa a expresarse
en camelo ÂżTemor a que la humanidad sea dominada por el
pĂĄnico conociendo lo que va a pasar? ÂżEs mĂĄs humano dejar
que perezcamos mientras estamos entretenidos resolviendo
un crucigrama
Philippe Frieden, La lettre et le miroir. Ăcrire lâhistoire dâactualitĂ© selon Jean Molinet
En choisissant pour titre Ăcrire lâhistoire dâactualitĂ©, Ph. Frieden dĂ©finit Ă la fois la problĂ©matique et le corpus de son Ă©tude. La dĂ©finition du rĂŽle de lââhistorienâ Ă la fin du Moyen Ăge ne pouvant ignorer les piĂšces (rondeaux, ballades, dits, prosimĂštresâŠ) qui ne relĂšvent pas Ă proprement parler de lâhistoriographie, mais bien dâune Ă©criture de âcirconstanceâ politique ou courtisane, câest lâensemble de lâĆuvre de Jean Molinet quâil sâagit de prendre en compte afin de dĂ©finir cette Ă©cri..
- âŠ