4,177 research outputs found

    Maximal almost disjoint families, determinacy, and forcing

    Full text link
    We study the notion of J\mathcal J-MAD families where J\mathcal J is a Borel ideal on ω\omega. We show that if J\mathcal J is an arbitrary FσF_\sigma ideal, or is any finite or countably iterated Fubini product of FσF_\sigma ideals, then there are no analytic infinite J\mathcal J-MAD families, and assuming Projective Determinacy there are no infinite projective J\mathcal J-MAD families; and under the full Axiom of Determinacy + V=L(R)V=\mathbf{L}(\mathbb{R}) there are no infinite J\mathcal J-mad families. These results apply in particular when J\mathcal J is the ideal of finite sets Fin\mathrm{Fin}, which corresponds to the classical notion of MAD families. The proofs combine ideas from invariant descriptive set theory and forcing.Comment: 40 page

    The Ramsey property implies no mad families

    Get PDF
    We show that if all collections of infinite subsets of N\N have the Ramsey property, then there are no infinite maximal almost disjoint (mad) families. This solves a long-standing problem going back to Mathias \cite{mathias}. The proof exploits an idea which has its natural roots in ergodic theory, topological dynamics, and invariant descriptive set theory: We use that a certain function associated to a purported mad family is invariant under the equivalence relation E0E_0, and thus is constant on a "large" set. Furthermore we announce a number of additional results about mad families relative to more complicated Borel ideals.Comment: 10 pages; fixed a mistake in Theorem 4.

    Projective maximal families of orthogonal measures with large continuum

    Full text link
    We study maximal orthogonal families of Borel probability measures on 2ω2^\omega (abbreviated m.o. families) and show that there are generic extensions of the constructible universe LL in which each of the following holds: (1) There is a Δ31\Delta^1_3-definable well order of the reals, there is a Π21\Pi^1_2-definable m.o. family, there are no Σ21\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_2-definable m.o. families and b=c=ω3\mathfrak{b}=\mathfrak{c}=\omega_3 (in fact any reasonable value of c\mathfrak{c} will do). (2) There is a Δ31\Delta^1_3-definable well order of the reals, there is a Π21\Pi^1_2-definable m.o. family, there are no Σ21\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_2-definable m.o. families, b=ω1\mathfrak{b}=\omega_1 and c=ω2\mathfrak{c}=\omega_2.Comment: 12 page

    Σ21\Sigma^1_2 and Π11\Pi^1_1 mad families

    Full text link
    We answer in the affirmative the following question of J\"org Brendle: If there is a Σ21\Sigma^1_2 mad family, is there then a Π11\Pi^1_1 mad family?Comment: This will appear in the Journal of Symbolic Logic (March 2014

    Definable maximal discrete sets in forcing extensions

    Full text link
    Let R\mathcal R be a Σ11\Sigma^1_1 binary relation, and recall that a set AA is R\mathcal R-discrete if no two elements of AA are related by R\mathcal R. We show that in the Sacks and Miller forcing extensions of LL there is a Δ21\Delta^1_2 maximal R\mathcal{R}-discrete set. We use this to answer in the negative the main question posed in [5] by showing that in the Sacks and Miller extensions there is a Π11\Pi^1_1 maximal orthogonal family ("mof") of Borel probability measures on Cantor space. A similar result is also obtained for Π11\Pi^1_1 mad families. By contrast, we show that if there is a Mathias real over LL then there are no Σ21\Sigma^1_2 mofs.Comment: 16 page

    Definable maximal cofinitary groups of intermediate size

    Full text link
    Using almost disjoint coding, we show that for each 1<M<N<ω1<M<N<\omega consistently d=ag=ℵM<c=ℵN\mathfrak{d}=\mathfrak{a}_g=\aleph_M<\mathfrak{c}=\aleph_N, where ag=ℵM\mathfrak{a}_g=\aleph_M is witnessed by a Π21\Pi^1_2 maximal cofinitary group.Comment: 22 page
    • …
    corecore