1,947 research outputs found
Profiling for run-time checking of computational properties and performance debugging in logic programs
Although several profiling techniques for identifying performance bottlenecks in logic programs have been developed, they are generally not automatic and in most cases they do not provide enough information for identifying the root causes of such bottlenecks. This complicates using their results for guiding performance improvement. We present a profiling method and tool that provides such explanations. Our profiler associates cost centers to certain program elements and can measure different types of resource-related properties that affect performance, preserving the precedence of cost centers in the cali graph. It includes an automatic method for detecting procedures that are performance bottlenecks.
The profiling tool has been integrated in a previously developed run-time checking framework to allow verification of certain properties when they cannot be verified statically. The approach allows checking global computational properties which require complex instrumentation tracking information about previous execution states, such as, e.g., that the execution time accumulated by a given procedure is not greater than
a given bound. We have built a prototype implementation, integrated it in the Ciao/CiaoPP system and successfully applied it to performance improvement, automatic optimization (e.g., resource-aware specialization
of programs), run-time checking, and debugging of global computational properties (e.g., resource usage) in Prolog programs
An Approach to Static Performance Guarantees for Programs with Run-time Checks
Instrumenting programs for performing run-time checking of properties, such
as regular shapes, is a common and useful technique that helps programmers
detect incorrect program behaviors. This is specially true in dynamic languages
such as Prolog. However, such run-time checks inevitably introduce run-time
overhead (in execution time, memory, energy, etc.). Several approaches have
been proposed for reducing such overhead, such as eliminating the checks that
can statically be proved to always succeed, and/or optimizing the way in which
the (remaining) checks are performed. However, there are cases in which it is
not possible to remove all checks statically (e.g., open libraries which must
check their interfaces, complex properties, unknown code, etc.) and in which,
even after optimizations, these remaining checks still may introduce an
unacceptable level of overhead. It is thus important for programmers to be able
to determine the additional cost due to the run-time checks and compare it to
some notion of admissible cost. The common practice used for estimating
run-time checking overhead is profiling, which is not exhaustive by nature.
Instead, we propose a method that uses static analysis to estimate such
overhead, with the advantage that the estimations are functions parameterized
by input data sizes. Unlike profiling, this approach can provide guarantees for
all possible execution traces, and allows assessing how the overhead grows as
the size of the input grows. Our method also extends an existing assertion
verification framework to express "admissible" overheads, and statically and
automatically checks whether the instrumented program conforms with such
specifications. Finally, we present an experimental evaluation of our approach
that suggests that our method is feasible and promising.Comment: 15 pages, 3 tables; submitted to ICLP'18, accepted as technical
communicatio
Practical Run-time Checking via Unobtrusive Property Caching
The use of annotations, referred to as assertions or contracts, to describe
program properties for which run-time tests are to be generated, has become
frequent in dynamic programing languages. However, the frameworks proposed to
support such run-time testing generally incur high time and/or space overheads
over standard program execution. We present an approach for reducing this
overhead that is based on the use of memoization to cache intermediate results
of check evaluation, avoiding repeated checking of previously verified
properties. Compared to approaches that reduce checking frequency, our proposal
has the advantage of being exhaustive (i.e., all tests are checked at all
points) while still being much more efficient than standard run-time checking.
Compared to the limited previous work on memoization, it performs the task
without requiring modifications to data structure representation or checking
code. While the approach is general and system-independent, we present it for
concreteness in the context of the Ciao run-time checking framework, which
allows us to provide an operational semantics with checks and caching. We also
report on a prototype implementation and provide some experimental results that
support that using a relatively small cache leads to significant decreases in
run-time checking overhead.Comment: 30 pages, 1 table, 170 figures; added appendix with plots; To appear
in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP), Proceedings of ICLP 201
An overview of the ciao multiparadigm language and program development environment and its design philosophy
We describe some of the novel aspects and motivations behind
the design and implementation of the Ciao multiparadigm programming system. An important aspect of Ciao is that it provides the programmer with a large number of useful features from different programming paradigms and styles, and that the use of each of these features can be turned on and off at will for each program module. Thus, a given module may be using e.g. higher order functions and constraints, while another module may be using objects, predicates, and concurrency. Furthermore, the language is designed to be extensible in a simple and modular way. Another important aspect of Ciao is its programming environment, which provides a powerful preprocessor (with an associated assertion language) capable of statically finding non-trivial bugs, verifying that programs comply with specifications, and performing many types of program optimizations. Such optimizations produce code that is highly competitive with other dynamic languages or, when the highest levéis of optimization are used, even that of static languages, all while retaining the interactive development environment of a dynamic language. The environment also includes a powerful auto-documenter. The paper provides an informal overview of the language and program development environment. It aims at illustrating the design philosophy rather than at being exhaustive, which would be impossible in the format of a paper, pointing instead to the existing literature on the system
Static Analysis-based Debugging, Certification, Testing, and Optimization with CiaoPP
Facilitate the development of safe, eïŹcient programs.
Approach:
âąNext-generation, higher-level, multiparadigm prog. languages.
âąImproved program development environments.
âąA framework (CiaoPP) which integrates:
âąDebugging.
âąVeriïŹcation and certiïŹcation.
âąTesting.
âąOptimization (optimized compilation, parallelization, ...
On Improving Run-time Checking in Dynamic Languages
In order to detect incorrect program behaviors, a number of approaches
have been proposed, which include a combination of language-level
constructs (procedure-level annotations such as assertions/contracts,
gradual types, etc.) and associated tools (such as static code analyzers
and run-time verification frameworks).
However, it is often the case that these constructs and tools are not
used to their full extent in practice due to a number of limitations
such as excessive run-time overhead and/or limited expressiveness.
The issue is especially prominent in the context of dynamic
languages without an underlying strong type system, such as Prolog.
In our work we propose several practical solutions for minimizing the
run-time overhead associated with assertion-based verification while
keeping the correctness guarantees provided by run-time checks.
We present the solutions in the context of the Ciao system, where a
combination of an abstract interpretation-based static analyzer and
run-time verification framework is available, although our proposals
can be straightforwardly adapted to any other similar system
An overview of ciao and its design philosophy
We provide an overall description of the Ciao multiparadigm programming system emphasizing some of the novel aspects and motivations behind its design and implementation. An important aspect of Ciao is that, in addition to supporting logic programming (and, in particular, Prolog), it provides the programmer with a large number of useful features from different programming paradigms and styles and that the use of each of these features (including those of Prolog) can be turned on and off at will for each program module. Thus,
a given module may be using, e.g., higher order functions and constraints, while another module may be using assignment, predicates, Prolog meta-programming, and concurrency. Furthermore, the language is designed to be extensible in a simple and modular way. Another important aspect of Ciao is its programming environment, which provides a powerful preprocessor (with an associated assertion language) capable of statically finding non-trivial bugs, verifying that programs comply with specifications, and performing many types of optimizations (including automatic parallelization). Such optimizations produce code that is highly competitive with other dynamic languages or, with the (experimental) optimizing compiler, even that of static languages, all while retaining the flexibility and interactive development of a dynamic language. This compilation architecture supports modularity and separate compilation throughout. The environment also includes a powerful autodocumenter and a unit testing framework, both closely integrated with the assertion system. The paper provides an informal overview of the language and program development environment. It aims at illustrating the design philosophy rather than at being exhaustive, which would be impossible in a single journal paper, pointing instead to previous Ciao literature
- âŠ