Goal reasoning for autonomous agents using automated planning

Mención Internacional en el título de doctorAutomated planning deals with the task of finding a sequence of actions, namely a plan, which achieves a goal from a given initial state. Most planning research consider goals are provided by a external user, and agents just have to find a plan to achieve them. However, there exist many real world domains where agents should not only reason about their actions but also about their goals, generating new ones or changing them according to the perceived environment. In this thesis we aim at broadening the goal reasoning capabilities of planningbased agents, both when acting in isolation and when operating in the same environment as other agents. In single-agent settings, we firstly explore a special type of planning tasks where we aim at discovering states that fulfill certain cost-based requirements with respect to a given set of goals. By computing these states, agents are able to solve interesting tasks such as find escape plans that move agents in to safe places, hide their true goal to a potential observer, or anticipate dynamically arriving goals. We also show how learning the environment’s dynamics may help agents to solve some of these tasks. Experimental results show that these states can be quickly found in practice, making agents able to solve new planning tasks and helping them in solving some existing ones. In multi-agent settings, we study the automated generation of goals based on other agents’ behavior. We focus on competitive scenarios, where we are interested in computing counterplans that prevent opponents from achieving their goals. We frame these tasks as counterplanning, providing theoretical properties of the counterplans that solve them. We also show how agents can benefit from computing some of the states we propose in the single-agent setting to anticipate their opponent’s movements, thus increasing the odds of blocking them. Experimental results show how counterplans can be found in different environments ranging from competitive planning domains to real-time strategy games.Programa de Doctorado en Ciencia y Tecnología Informática por la Universidad Carlos III de MadridPresidenta: Eva Onaindía de la Rivaherrera.- Secretario: Ángel García Olaya.- Vocal: Mark Robert

Building bridges for better machines : from machine ethics to machine explainability and back

Be it nursing robots in Japan, self-driving buses in Germany or automated hiring systems in the USA, complex artificial computing systems have become an indispensable part of our everyday lives. Two major challenges arise from this development: machine ethics and machine explainability. Machine ethics deals with behavioral constraints on systems to ensure restricted, morally acceptable behavior; machine explainability affords the means to satisfactorily explain the actions and decisions of systems so that human users can understand these systems and, thus, be assured of their socially beneficial effects. Machine ethics and explainability prove to be particularly efficient only in symbiosis. In this context, this thesis will demonstrate how machine ethics requires machine explainability and how machine explainability includes machine ethics. We develop these two facets using examples from the scenarios above. Based on these examples, we argue for a specific view of machine ethics and suggest how it can be formalized in a theoretical framework. In terms of machine explainability, we will outline how our proposed framework, by using an argumentation-based approach for decision making, can provide a foundation for machine explanations. Beyond the framework, we will also clarify the notion of machine explainability as a research area, charting its diverse and often confusing literature. To this end, we will outline what, exactly, machine explainability research aims to accomplish. Finally, we will use all these considerations as a starting point for developing evaluation criteria for good explanations, such as comprehensibility, assessability, and fidelity. Evaluating our framework using these criteria shows that it is a promising approach and augurs to outperform many other explainability approaches that have been developed so far.DFG: CRC 248: Center for Perspicuous Computing; VolkswagenStiftung: Explainable Intelligent System