Recognizing Textual Entailment Using Description Logic And Semantic Relatedness

Textual entailment (TE) is a relation that holds between two pieces of text where one reading the first piece can conclude that the second is most likely true. Accurate approaches for textual entailment can be beneficial to various natural language processing (NLP) applications such as: question answering, information extraction, summarization, and even machine translation. For this reason, research on textual entailment has attracted a significant amount of attention in recent years. A robust logical-based meaning representation of text is very hard to build, therefore the majority of textual entailment approaches rely on syntactic methods or shallow semantic alternatives. In addition, approaches that do use a logical-based meaning representation, require a large knowledge base of axioms and inference rules that are rarely available. The goal of this thesis is to design an efficient description logic based approach for recognizing textual entailment that uses semantic relatedness information as an alternative to large knowledge base of axioms and inference rules. In this thesis, we propose a description logic and semantic relatedness approach to textual entailment, where the type of semantic relatedness axioms employed in aligning the description logic representations are used as indicators of textual entailment. In our approach, the text and the hypothesis are first represented in description logic. The representations are enriched with additional semantic knowledge acquired by using the web as a corpus. The hypothesis is then merged into the text representation by learning semantic relatedness axioms on demand and a reasoner is then used to reason over the aligned representation. Finally, the types of axioms employed by the reasoner are used to learn if the text entails the hypothesis or not. To validate our approach we have implemented an RTE system named AORTE, and evaluated its performance on recognizing textual entailment using the fourth recognizing textual entailment challenge. Our approach achieved an accuracy of 68.8 on the two way task and 61.6 on the three way task which ranked the approach as 2nd when compared to the other participating runs in the same challenge. These results show that our description logical based approach can effectively be used to recognize textual entailment

Génération de résumés par abstraction

Cette thèse présente le résultat de plusieurs années de recherche dans le domaine de la génération automatique de résumés. Trois contributions majeures, présentées sous la forme d'articles publiés ou soumis pour publication, en forment le coeur. Elles retracent un cheminement qui part des méthodes par extraction en résumé jusqu'aux méthodes par abstraction. L'expérience HexTac, sujet du premier article, a d'abord été menée pour évaluer le niveau de performance des êtres humains dans la rédaction de résumés par extraction de phrases. Les résultats montrent un écart important entre la performance humaine sous la contrainte d'extraire des phrases du texte source par rapport à la rédaction de résumés sans contrainte. Cette limite à la rédaction de résumés par extraction de phrases, observée empiriquement, démontre l'intérêt de développer d'autres approches automatiques pour le résumé. Nous avons ensuite développé un premier système selon l'approche Fully Abstractive Summarization, qui se situe dans la catégorie des approches semi-extractives, comme la compression de phrases et la fusion de phrases. Le développement et l'évaluation du système, décrits dans le second article, ont permis de constater le grand défi de générer un résumé facile à lire sans faire de l'extraction de phrases. Dans cette approche, le niveau de compréhension du contenu du texte source demeure insuffisant pour guider le processus de sélection du contenu pour le résumé, comme dans les approches par extraction de phrases. Enfin, l'approche par abstraction basée sur des connaissances nommée K-BABS est proposée dans un troisième article. Un repérage des éléments d'information pertinents est effectué, menant directement à la génération de phrases pour le résumé. Cette approche a été implémentée dans le système ABSUM, qui produit des résumés très courts mais riches en contenu. Ils ont été évalués selon les standards d'aujourd'hui et cette évaluation montre que des résumés hybrides formés à la fois de la sortie d'ABSUM et de phrases extraites ont un contenu informatif significativement plus élevé qu'un système provenant de l'état de l'art en extraction de phrases.This Ph.D. thesis is the result of several years of research on automatic text summarization. Three major contributions are presented in the form of published and submitted papers. They follow a path that moves away from extractive summarization and toward abstractive summarization. The first article describes the HexTac experiment, which was conducted to evaluate the performance of humans summarizing text by extracting sentences. Results show a wide gap of performance between human summaries written by sentence extraction and those written without restriction. This empirical performance ceiling to sentence extraction demonstrates the need for new approaches to text summarization. We then developed and implemented a system, which is the subject of the second article, using the Fully Abstractive Summarization approach. Though the name suggests otherwise, this approach is better categorized as semi-extractive, along with sentence compression and sentence fusion. Building and evaluating this system brought to light the great challenge associated with generating easily readable summaries without extracting sentences. In this approach, text understanding is not deep enough to provide help in the content selection process, as is the case in extractive summarization. As the third contribution, a knowledge-based approach to abstractive summarization called K-BABS was proposed. Relevant content is identified by pattern matching on an analysis of the source text, and rules are applied to directly generate sentences for the summary. This approach is implemented in a system called ABSUM, which generates very short and content-rich summaries. An evaluation was performed according to today's standards. The evaluation shows that hybrid summaries generated by adding extracted sentences to ABSUM's output have significantly more content than a state-of-the-art extractive summarizer

Joint Discourse-aware Concept Disambiguation and Clustering

This thesis addresses the tasks of concept disambiguation and clustering. Concept disambiguation is the task of linking common nouns and proper names in a text – henceforth called mentions – to their corresponding concepts in a predefined inventory. Concept clustering is the task of clustering mentions, so that all mentions in one cluster denote the same concept. In this thesis, we investigate concept disambiguation and clustering from a discourse perspective and propose a discourse-aware approach for joint concept disambiguation and clustering in the framework of Markov logic. The contributions of this thesis are fourfold: Joint Concept Disambiguation and Clustering. In previous approaches, concept disambiguation and concept clustering have been considered as two separate tasks (Schütze, 1998; Ji & Grishman, 2011). We analyze the relationship between concept disambiguation and concept clustering and argue that these two tasks can mutually support each other. We propose the – to our knowledge – first joint approach for concept disambiguation and clustering. Discourse-Aware Concept Disambiguation. One of the determining factors for concept disambiguation and clustering is the context definition. Most previous approaches use the same context definition for all mentions (Milne & Witten, 2008b; Kulkarni et al., 2009; Ratinov et al., 2011, inter alia). We approach the question which context is relevant to disambiguate a mention from a discourse perspective and state that different mentions require different notions of contexts. We state that the context that is relevant to disambiguate a mention depends on its embedding into discourse. However, how a mention is embedded into discourse depends on its denoted concept. Hence, the identification of the denoted concept and the relevant concept mutually depend on each other. We propose a binwise approach with three different context definitions and model the selection of the context definition and the disambiguation jointly. Modeling Interdependencies with Markov Logic. To model the interdependencies between concept disambiguation and concept clustering as well as the interdependencies between the context definition and the disambiguation, we use Markov logic (Domingos & Lowd, 2009). Markov logic combines first order logic with probabilities and allows us to concisely formalize these interdependencies. We investigate how we can balance between linguistic appropriateness and time efficiency and propose a hybrid approach that combines joint inference with aggregation techniques. Concept Disambiguation and Clustering beyond English: Multi- and Cross-linguality. Given the vast amount of texts written in different languages, the capability to extend an approach to cope with other languages than English is essential. We thus analyze how our approach copes with other languages than English and show that our approach largely scales across languages, even without retraining. Our approach is evaluated on multiple data sets originating from different sources (e.g. news, web) and across multiple languages. As an inventory, we use Wikipedia. We compare our approach to other approaches and show that it achieves state-of-the-art results. Furthermore, we show that joint concept disambiguating and clustering as well as joint context selection and disambiguation leads to significant improvements ceteris paribus

Filtrage et agrégation d'informations vitales relatives à des entités

Nowadays, knowledge bases such as Wikipedia and DBpedia are the main sources to access information on a wide variety of entities (an entity is a thing that can be distinctly identified such a person, an organization, a product, an event, etc.). However, the update of these sources with new information related to a given entity is done manually by contributors with a significant latency time particularly if that entity is not popular. A system that analyzes documents when published on the Web to filter important information about entities will probably accelerate the update of these knowledge bases. In this thesis, we are interested in filtering timely and relevant information, called vital information, concerning the entities. We aim at answering the following two issues: (1) How to detect if a document is vital (i.e., it provides timely relevant information) to an entity? and (2) How to extract vital information from these documents to build a temporal summary about the entity that can be seen as a reference for updating the corresponding knowledge base entry?Regarding the first issue, we proposed two methods. The first proposal is fully supervised. It is based on a vitality language model. The second proposal measures the freshness of temporal expressions in a document to decide its vitality. Concerning the second issue, we proposed a method that selects the sentences based on the presence of triggers words automatically retrieved from the knowledge already represented in the knowledge base (such as the description of similar entities).We carried out our experiments on the TREC Stream corpus 2013 and 2014 with 1.2 billion documents and different types of entities (persons, organizations, facilities and events). For vital documents filtering approaches, we conducted our experiments in the context of the task "knowledge Base Acceleration (KBA)" for the years 2013 and 2014. Our method based on leveraging the temporal expressions in the document obtained good results outperforming the best participant system in the task KBA 2013. In addition, we showed the importance of our generated temporal summaries to accelerate the update of knowledge bases.Aujourd'hui, les bases de connaissances telles que Wikipedia et DBpedia représentent les sources principales pour accéder aux informations disponibles sur une grande variété d'entités (une entité est une chose qui peut être distinctement identifiée par exemple une personne, une organisation, un produit, un événement, etc.). Cependant, la mise à jour de ces sources avec des informations nouvelles en rapport avec une entité donnée se fait manuellement par des contributeurs et avec un temps de latence important en particulier si cette entité n'est pas populaire. Concevoir un système qui analyse les documents dès leur publication sur le Web pour filtrer les informations importantes relatives à des entités pourra sans doute accélérer la mise à jour de ces bases de connaissances. Dans cette thèse, nous nous intéressons au filtrage d'informations pertinentes et nouvelles, appelées vitales, relatives à des entités. Ces travaux rentrent dans le cadre de la recherche d'information mais visent aussi à enrichir les techniques d'ingénierie de connaissances en aidant à la sélection des informations à traiter. Nous souhaitons répondre principalement aux deux problématiques suivantes: (1) Comment détecter si un document est vital (c.à.d qu'il apporte une information pertinente et nouvelle) par rapport à une entité donnée? et (2) Comment extraire les informations vitales à partir de ces documents qui serviront comme référence pour mettre à jour des bases de connaissances? Concernant la première problématique, nous avons proposé deux méthodes. La première proposition est totalement supervisée. Elle se base sur un modèle de langue de vitalité. La deuxième proposition mesure la fraîcheur des expressions temporelles contenues dans un document afin de décider de sa vitalité. En ce qui concerne la deuxième problématique relative à l'extraction d'informations vitales à partir des documents vitaux, nous avons proposé une méthode qui sélectionne les phrases comportant potentiellement ces informations vitales, en nous basant sur la présence de mots déclencheurs récupérés automatiquement à partir de la connaissance déjà représentée dans la base de connaissances (comme la description d'entités similaires).L'évaluation des approches proposées a été effectuée dans le cadre de la campagne d'évaluation internationale TREC sur une collection de 1.2 milliard de documents avec différents types d'entités (personnes, organisations, établissements et événements). Pour les approches de filtrage de documents vitaux, nous avons mené nos expérimentations dans le cadre de la tâche "Knwoledge Base Acceleration (KBA)" pour les années 2013 et 2014. L'exploitation des expressions temporelles dans le document a permis d'obtenir de bons résultats dépassant le meilleur système proposé dans la tâche KBA 2013. Pour évaluer les contributions concernant l'extraction des informations vitales relatives à des entités, nous nous sommes basés sur le cadre expérimental de la tâche "Temporal Summarization (TS)". Nous avons montré que notre approche permet de minimiser le temps de latence des mises à jour de bases de connaissances