An Analytical Approach to Programs as Data Objects

This essay accompanies a selection of 32 articles (referred to in bold face in the text and marginally marked in the bibliographic references) submitted to Aarhus University towards a Doctor Scientiarum degree in Computer Science.The author's previous academic degree, beyond a doctoral degree in June 1986, is an "Habilitation à diriger les recherches" from the Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI) in France; the corresponding material was submitted in September 1992 and the degree was obtained in January 1993.The present 32 articles have all been written since 1993 and while at DAIMI.Except for one other PhD student, all co-authors are or have been the author's students here in Aarhus

Lambda-Dropping: Transforming Recursive Equations into Programs with Block Structure

Lambda-lifting a functional program transforms it into a set of recursiveequations. We present the symmetric transformation: lambda-dropping.Lambda-dropping a set of recursive equations restores blockstructure and lexical scope.For lack of scope, recursive equations must carry around all theparameters that any of their callees might possibly need. Both lambda-liftingand lambda-dropping thus require one to compute a transitiveclosure over the call graph:- for lambda-lifting: to establish the Def/Use path of each freevariable (these free variables are then added as parameters toeach of the functions in the call path);- for lambda-dropping: to establish the Def/Use path of each parameter(parameters whose use occurs in the same scope as theirdefinition do not need to be passed along in the call path).Without free variables, a program is scope-insensitive. Its blocks arethen free to float (for lambda-lifting) or to sink (for lambda-dropping)along the vertices of the scope tree.We believe lambda-lifting and lambda-dropping are interesting perse, both in principle and in practice, but our prime application is partialevaluation: except for Malmkjær and Ørbæk's case study presented atPEPM'95, most polyvariant specializers for procedural programs operateon recursive equations. To this end, in a pre-processing phase,they lambda-lift source programs into recursive equations. As a result,residual programs are also expressed as recursive equations, often withdozens of parameters, which most compilers do not handle efficiently.Lambda-dropping in a post-processing phase restores their block structureand lexical scope thereby significantly reducing both the compiletime and the run time of residual programs.

Declarative Specialization for Object-Oriented-Program Specialization

The use of partial evaluation for specializing programs written in im- perative languages such as C and Java is hampered by the di-culty of controlling the specialization process. We have developed a simple, declar- ative language for controlling the specialization of Java programs, and in- terfaced this language with the JSpec partial evaluator for Java. This lan- guage, named Pesto, allows declarative specialization of programs written in an object-oriented style of programming. The Pesto compiler auto- matically generates the context information needed for specializing Java programs, and automatically generates guards that enable the specialized code in the right context

An Operational Foundation for Delimited Continuations in the CPS Hierarchy

We present an abstract machine and a reduction semantics for the lambda-calculus extended with control operators that give access to delimited continuations in the CPS hierarchy. The abstract machine is derived from an evaluator in continuation-passing style (CPS); the reduction semantics (i.e., a small-step operational semantics with an explicit representation of evaluation contexts) is constructed from the abstract machine; and the control operators are the shift and reset family. At level n of the CPS hierarchy, programs can use the control operators shift_i and reset_i for

An Operational Foundation for Delimited Continuations in the CPS Hierarchy

We present an abstract machine and a reduction semantics for the lambda-calculus extended with control operators that give access to delimited continuations in the CPS hierarchy. The abstract machine is derived from an evaluator in continuation-passing style (CPS); the reduction semantics (i.e., a small-step operational semantics with an explicit representation of evaluation contexts) is constructed from the abstract machine; and the control operators are the shift and reset family. At level n of the CPS hierarchy, programs can use the control operators shift_i and reset_i for

An Operational Foundation for Delimited Continuations in<br><br> the<br><br><br> CPS<br><br> Hierarchy

We present an abstract machine and a reduction semantics for the lambda-calculus extended with control operators that give access to delimited continuations in the CPS hierarchy. The abstract machine is derived from an evaluator in continuation-passing style (CPS); the reduction semantics (i.e., a small-step operational semantics with an explicit representation of evaluation contexts) is constructed from the abstract machine; and the control operators are the shift and reset family. We also present new applications of delimited continuations in the CPS hierarchy: finding list prefixes and normalization by evaluation for a hierarchical language of units and products.Comment: 39 page

An Operational Foundation for Delimited Continuations in the CPS Hierarchy

We present an abstract machine and a reduction semantics for the lambda-calculus extended with control operators that give access to delimited continuations in the CPS hierarchy. The abstract machine is derived from an evaluator in continuation-passing style (CPS); the reduction semantics (i.e., a small-step operational semantics with an explicit representation of evaluation contexts) is constructed from the abstract machine; and the control operators are the shift and reset family. At level n of the CPS hierarchy, programs can use the control operators shift_i and reset_i for

From Interpreter to Compiler and Virtual Machine: A Functional Derivation

We show how to derive a compiler and a virtual machine from a compositional interpreter. We first illustrate the derivation with two evaluation functions and two normalization functions. We obtain Krivine's machine, Felleisen et al.'s CEK machine, and a generalization of these machines performing strong normalization, which is new. We observe that several existing compilers and virtual machines--e.g., the Categorical Abstract Machine (CAM), Schmidt's VEC machine, and Leroy's Zinc abstract machine--are already in derived form and we present the corresponding interpreter for the CAM and the VEC machine. We also consider Hannan and Miller's CLS machine and Landin's SECD machine. We derived Krivine's machine via a call-by-name CPS transformation and the CEK machine via a call-by-value CPS transformation. These two derivations hold both for an evaluation function and for a normalization function. They provide a non-trivial illustration of Reynolds's warning about the evaluation order of a meta-language