72 research outputs found

    Fault Tolerant Max-Cut

    Get PDF
    In this work, we initiate the study of fault tolerant Max-Cut, where given an edge-weighted undirected graph G = (V,E), the goal is to find a cut S ? V that maximizes the total weight of edges that cross S even after an adversary removes k vertices from G. We consider two types of adversaries: an adaptive adversary that sees the outcome of the random coin tosses used by the algorithm, and an oblivious adversary that does not. For any constant number of failures k we present an approximation of (0.878-?) against an adaptive adversary and of ?_{GW}? 0.8786 against an oblivious adversary (here ?_{GW} is the approximation achieved by the random hyperplane algorithm of [Goemans-Williamson J. ACM `95]). Additionally, we present a hardness of approximation of ?_{GW} against both types of adversaries, rendering our results (virtually) tight. The non-linear nature of the fault tolerant objective makes the design and analysis of algorithms harder when compared to the classic Max-Cut. Hence, we employ approaches ranging from multi-objective optimization to LP duality and the ellipsoid algorithm to obtain our results

    Optimal Vertex Fault Tolerant Spanners (for fixed stretch)

    Full text link
    A kk-spanner of a graph GG is a sparse subgraph HH whose shortest path distances match those of GG up to a multiplicative error kk. In this paper we study spanners that are resistant to faults. A subgraph HβŠ†GH \subseteq G is an ff vertex fault tolerant (VFT) kk-spanner if Hβˆ–FH \setminus F is a kk-spanner of Gβˆ–FG \setminus F for any small set FF of ff vertices that might "fail." One of the main questions in the area is: what is the minimum size of an ff fault tolerant kk-spanner that holds for all nn node graphs (as a function of ff, kk and nn)? This question was first studied in the context of geometric graphs [Levcopoulos et al. STOC '98, Czumaj and Zhao SoCG '03] and has more recently been considered in general undirected graphs [Chechik et al. STOC '09, Dinitz and Krauthgamer PODC '11]. In this paper, we settle the question of the optimal size of a VFT spanner, in the setting where the stretch factor kk is fixed. Specifically, we prove that every (undirected, possibly weighted) nn-node graph GG has a (2kβˆ’1)(2k-1)-spanner resilient to ff vertex faults with Ok(f1βˆ’1/kn1+1/k)O_k(f^{1 - 1/k} n^{1 + 1/k}) edges, and this is fully optimal (unless the famous Erdos Girth Conjecture is false). Our lower bound even generalizes to imply that no data structure capable of approximating distGβˆ–F(s,t)dist_{G \setminus F}(s, t) similarly can beat the space usage of our spanner in the worst case. We also consider the edge fault tolerant (EFT) model, defined analogously with edge failures rather than vertex failures. We show that the same spanner upper bound applies in this setting. Our data structure lower bound extends to the case k=2k=2 (and hence we close the EFT problem for 33-approximations), but it falls to Ξ©(f1/2βˆ’1/(2k)β‹…n1+1/k)\Omega(f^{1/2 - 1/(2k)} \cdot n^{1 + 1/k}) for kβ‰₯3k \ge 3. We leave it as an open problem to close this gap.Comment: To appear in SODA 201

    \~{O}ptimal Vertex Fault-Tolerant Spanners in \~{O}ptimal Time: Sequential, Distributed and Parallel

    Full text link
    We (nearly) settle the time complexity for computing vertex fault-tolerant (VFT) spanners with optimal sparsity (up to polylogarithmic factors). VFT spanners are sparse subgraphs that preserve distance information, up to a small multiplicative stretch, in the presence of vertex failures. These structures were introduced by [Chechik et al., STOC 2009] and have received a lot of attention since then. We provide algorithms for computing nearly optimal ff-VFT spanners for any nn-vertex mm-edge graph, with near optimal running time in several computational models: - A randomized sequential algorithm with a runtime of O~(m)\widetilde{O}(m) (i.e., independent in the number of faults ff). The state-of-the-art time bound is O~(f1βˆ’1/kβ‹…n2+1/k+f2m)\widetilde{O}(f^{1-1/k}\cdot n^{2+1/k}+f^2 m) by [Bodwin, Dinitz and Robelle, SODA 2021]. - A distributed congest algorithm of O~(1)\widetilde{O}(1) rounds. Improving upon [Dinitz and Robelle, PODC 2020] that obtained FT spanners with near-optimal sparsity in O~(f2)\widetilde{O}(f^{2}) rounds. - A PRAM (CRCW) algorithm with O~(m)\widetilde{O}(m) work and O~(1)\widetilde{O}(1) depth. Prior bounds implied by [Dinitz and Krauthgamer, PODC 2011] obtained sub-optimal FT spanners using O~(f3m)\widetilde{O}(f^3m) work and O~(f3)\widetilde{O}(f^3) depth. An immediate corollary provides the first nearly-optimal PRAM algorithm for computing nearly optimal Ξ»\lambda-\emph{vertex} connectivity certificates using polylogarithmic depth and near-linear work. This improves the state-of-the-art parallel bounds of O~(1)\widetilde{O}(1) depth and O(Ξ»m)O(\lambda m) work, by [Karger and Motwani, STOC'93].Comment: STOC 202
    • …
    corecore