The Archive Query Log: Mining Millions of Search Result Pages of Hundreds of Search Engines from 25 Years of Web Archives

The Archive Query Log (AQL) is a previously unused, comprehensive query log collected at the Internet Archive over the last 25 years. Its first version includes 356 million queries, 166 million search result pages, and 1.7 billion search results across 550 search providers. Although many query logs have been studied in the literature, the search providers that own them generally do not publish their logs to protect user privacy and vital business data. Of the few query logs publicly available, none combines size, scope, and diversity. The AQL is the first to do so, enabling research on new retrieval models and (diachronic) search engine analyses. Provided in a privacy-preserving manner, it promotes open research as well as more transparency and accountability in the search industry.Comment: SIGIR 2023 resource paper, 13 page

Filtrage et agrégation d'informations vitales relatives à des entités

Nowadays, knowledge bases such as Wikipedia and DBpedia are the main sources to access information on a wide variety of entities (an entity is a thing that can be distinctly identified such a person, an organization, a product, an event, etc.). However, the update of these sources with new information related to a given entity is done manually by contributors with a significant latency time particularly if that entity is not popular. A system that analyzes documents when published on the Web to filter important information about entities will probably accelerate the update of these knowledge bases. In this thesis, we are interested in filtering timely and relevant information, called vital information, concerning the entities. We aim at answering the following two issues: (1) How to detect if a document is vital (i.e., it provides timely relevant information) to an entity? and (2) How to extract vital information from these documents to build a temporal summary about the entity that can be seen as a reference for updating the corresponding knowledge base entry?Regarding the first issue, we proposed two methods. The first proposal is fully supervised. It is based on a vitality language model. The second proposal measures the freshness of temporal expressions in a document to decide its vitality. Concerning the second issue, we proposed a method that selects the sentences based on the presence of triggers words automatically retrieved from the knowledge already represented in the knowledge base (such as the description of similar entities).We carried out our experiments on the TREC Stream corpus 2013 and 2014 with 1.2 billion documents and different types of entities (persons, organizations, facilities and events). For vital documents filtering approaches, we conducted our experiments in the context of the task "knowledge Base Acceleration (KBA)" for the years 2013 and 2014. Our method based on leveraging the temporal expressions in the document obtained good results outperforming the best participant system in the task KBA 2013. In addition, we showed the importance of our generated temporal summaries to accelerate the update of knowledge bases.Aujourd'hui, les bases de connaissances telles que Wikipedia et DBpedia représentent les sources principales pour accéder aux informations disponibles sur une grande variété d'entités (une entité est une chose qui peut être distinctement identifiée par exemple une personne, une organisation, un produit, un événement, etc.). Cependant, la mise à jour de ces sources avec des informations nouvelles en rapport avec une entité donnée se fait manuellement par des contributeurs et avec un temps de latence important en particulier si cette entité n'est pas populaire. Concevoir un système qui analyse les documents dès leur publication sur le Web pour filtrer les informations importantes relatives à des entités pourra sans doute accélérer la mise à jour de ces bases de connaissances. Dans cette thèse, nous nous intéressons au filtrage d'informations pertinentes et nouvelles, appelées vitales, relatives à des entités. Ces travaux rentrent dans le cadre de la recherche d'information mais visent aussi à enrichir les techniques d'ingénierie de connaissances en aidant à la sélection des informations à traiter. Nous souhaitons répondre principalement aux deux problématiques suivantes: (1) Comment détecter si un document est vital (c.à.d qu'il apporte une information pertinente et nouvelle) par rapport à une entité donnée? et (2) Comment extraire les informations vitales à partir de ces documents qui serviront comme référence pour mettre à jour des bases de connaissances? Concernant la première problématique, nous avons proposé deux méthodes. La première proposition est totalement supervisée. Elle se base sur un modèle de langue de vitalité. La deuxième proposition mesure la fraîcheur des expressions temporelles contenues dans un document afin de décider de sa vitalité. En ce qui concerne la deuxième problématique relative à l'extraction d'informations vitales à partir des documents vitaux, nous avons proposé une méthode qui sélectionne les phrases comportant potentiellement ces informations vitales, en nous basant sur la présence de mots déclencheurs récupérés automatiquement à partir de la connaissance déjà représentée dans la base de connaissances (comme la description d'entités similaires).L'évaluation des approches proposées a été effectuée dans le cadre de la campagne d'évaluation internationale TREC sur une collection de 1.2 milliard de documents avec différents types d'entités (personnes, organisations, établissements et événements). Pour les approches de filtrage de documents vitaux, nous avons mené nos expérimentations dans le cadre de la tâche "Knwoledge Base Acceleration (KBA)" pour les années 2013 et 2014. L'exploitation des expressions temporelles dans le document a permis d'obtenir de bons résultats dépassant le meilleur système proposé dans la tâche KBA 2013. Pour évaluer les contributions concernant l'extraction des informations vitales relatives à des entités, nous nous sommes basés sur le cadre expérimental de la tâche "Temporal Summarization (TS)". Nous avons montré que notre approche permet de minimiser le temps de latence des mises à jour de bases de connaissances

Combination of Evidence for Effective Web Search

In this paper we describe Carnegie Mellon University’s submission to the TREC 2010 Web Track. Our baseline run combines different methods, of which in particular the spam prior and mixture model were found the most effective. We also experimented with expansion over the Wikipedia corpus and found that picking the right Wikipedia articles for expansion can improve performance substantially. Furthermore, we did preliminary experiments with combining expansion over the Wikipedia corpus with expansion over the top ranked web pages. 1

Augmenting Ad-Hoc IR Dataset for Interactive Conversational Search

A peculiarity of conversational search systems is that they involve mixed-initiatives such as system-generated query clarifying questions. Evaluating those systems at a large scale on the end task of IR is very challenging, requiring adequate datasets containing such interactions. However, current datasets only focus on either traditional ad-hoc IR tasks or query clarification tasks, the latter being usually seen as a reformulation task from the initial query. The only two datasets known to us that contain both document relevance judgments and the associated clarification interactions are Qulac and ClariQ. Both are based on the TREC Web Track 2009-12 collection, but cover a very limited number of topics (237 topics), far from being enough for training and testing conversational IR models. To fill the gap, we propose a methodology to automatically build large-scale conversational IR datasets from ad-hoc IR datasets in order to facilitate explorations on conversational IR. Our methodology is based on two processes: 1) generating query clarification interactions through query clarification and answer generators, and 2) augmenting ad-hoc IR datasets with simulated interactions. In this paper, we focus on MsMarco and augment it with query clarification and answer simulations. We perform a thorough evaluation showing the quality and the relevance of the generated interactions for each initial query. This paper shows the feasibility and utility of augmenting ad-hoc IR datasets for conversational IR

Cheap IR Evaluation: Fewer Topics, No Relevance Judgements, and Crowdsourced Assessments

To evaluate Information Retrieval (IR) effectiveness, a possible approach is to use test collections, which are composed of a collection of documents, a set of description of information needs (called topics), and a set of relevant documents to each topic. Test collections are modelled in a competition scenario: for example, in the well known TREC initiative, participants run their own retrieval systems over a set of topics and they provide a ranked list of retrieved documents; some of the retrieved documents (usually the first ranked) constitute the so called pool, and their relevance is evaluated by human assessors; the document list is then used to compute effectiveness metrics and rank the participant systems. Private Web Search companies also run their in-house evaluation exercises; although the details are mostly unknown, and the aims are somehow different, the overall approach shares several issues with the test collection approach. The aim of this work is to: (i) develop and improve some state-of-the-art work on the evaluation of IR effectiveness while saving resources, and (ii) propose a novel, more principled and engineered, overall approach to test collection based effectiveness evaluation. [...