Probing Convex Polygons with a Wedge

Minimizing the number of probes is one of the main challenges in reconstructing geometric objects with probing devices. In this paper, we investigate the problem of using an $\omega$-wedge probing tool to determine the exact shape and orientation of a convex polygon. An $\omega$-wedge consists of two rays emanating from a point called the apex of the wedge and the two rays forming an angle $\omega$. To probe with an $\omega$-wedge, we set the direction that the apex of the probe has to follow, the line $\overrightarrow L$, and the initial orientation of the two rays. A valid $\omega$-probe of a convex polygon $O$ contains $O$ within the $\omega$-wedge and its outcome consists of the coordinates of the apex, the orientation of both rays and the coordinates of the closest (to the apex) points of contact between $O$ and each of the rays. We present algorithms minimizing the number of probes and prove their optimality. In particular, we show how to reconstruct a convex $n$-gon (with all internal angles of size larger than $\omega$) using $2n-2$ $\omega$-probes; if $\omega = \pi/2$, the reconstruction uses $2n-3$ $\omega$-probes. We show that both results are optimal. Let $N_B$ be the number of vertices of $O$ whose internal angle is at most $\omega$, (we show that $0 \leq N_B \leq 3$). We determine the shape and orientation of a general convex $n$-gon with $N_B=1$ (respectively $N_B=2$, $N_B=3$) using $2n-1$ (respectively $2n+3$, $2n+5$) $\omega$-probes. We prove optimality for the first case. Assuming the algorithm knows the value of $N_B$ in advance, the reconstruction of $O$ with $N_B=2$ or $N_B=3$ can be achieved with $2n+2$ probes,- which is optimal.Comment: 31 pages, 27 figure

Model-based probing strategies for convex polygons

AbstractWe prove that n+4 finger probes are sufficient to determine the shape of a convex n-gon from a finite collection of models, improving the previous result of 2n+1. Further, we show that n−1 are necessary, proving this is optimal to within an additive constant. For line probes, we show that 2n+4 probes are sufficient and 2n−3 necessary. The difference between these results is particularly interesting in light of the duality relationship between finger and line probes

Local tests for consistency of support hyperplane data

Caption title.Includes bibliographical references (p. 32-33).Supported by the U.S. Army Research Office. DAAL03-92-G-0115 DAAL03-92-G-0320 Supported by the Office of Naval Research. N00014-91-J-1004 Supported by the National Science Foundation. MIP-9015281 IRI-9209577William C. Karl ... [et al.]