975 research outputs found
The risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length
Mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length is a common
practice in language research. However, the empirical distribution of
dependency lengths of sentences of the same length differs from that of
sentences of varying length and the distribution of dependency lengths depends
on sentence length for real sentences and also under the null hypothesis that
dependencies connect vertices located in random positions of the sequence. This
suggests that certain results, such as the distribution of syntactic dependency
lengths mixing dependencies from sentences of varying length, could be a mere
consequence of that mixing. Furthermore, differences in the global averages of
dependency length (mixing lengths from sentences of varying length) for two
different languages do not simply imply a priori that one language optimizes
dependency lengths better than the other because those differences could be due
to differences in the distribution of sentence lengths and other factors.Comment: Laguage and referencing has been improved; Eqs. 7, 11, B7 and B8 have
been correcte
Dependency parsing of Turkish
The suitability of different parsing methods for different languages is an important topic in
syntactic parsing. Especially lesser-studied languages, typologically different from the languages
for which methods have originally been developed, poses interesting challenges in this respect.
This article presents an investigation of data-driven dependency parsing of Turkish, an agglutinative
free constituent order language that can be seen as the representative of a wider class
of languages of similar type. Our investigations show that morphological structure plays an
essential role in finding syntactic relations in such a language. In particular, we show that
employing sublexical representations called inflectional groups, rather than word forms, as the
basic parsing units improves parsing accuracy. We compare two different parsing methods, one
based on a probabilistic model with beam search, the other based on discriminative classifiers and
a deterministic parsing strategy, and show that the usefulness of sublexical units holds regardless
of parsing method.We examine the impact of morphological and lexical information in detail and
show that, properly used, this kind of information can improve parsing accuracy substantially.
Applying the techniques presented in this article, we achieve the highest reported accuracy for
parsing the Turkish Treebank
Treebank-based acquisition of LFG resources for Chinese
This paper presents a method to automatically acquire wide-coverage, robust, probabilistic Lexical-Functional Grammar resources for Chinese from the Penn Chinese Treebank (CTB). Our starting point is the earlier, proofof-
concept work of (Burke et al., 2004) on automatic f-structure annotation, LFG grammar acquisition and parsing for Chinese using the CTB version 2 (CTB2). We substantially extend and improve on this earlier research as regards coverage, robustness, quality and fine-grainedness of the resulting LFG resources. We achieve this through (i) improved LFG analyses for a number of core Chinese phenomena; (ii) a new automatic f-structure annotation architecture which involves an intermediate dependency representation; (iii) scaling the approach from 4.1K trees in CTB2 to 18.8K trees in CTB version 5.1 (CTB5.1) and (iv) developing a novel treebank-based approach to recovering non-local dependencies (NLDs) for Chinese parser output. Against a new 200-sentence good standard of manually constructed f-structures, the method achieves 96.00% f-score for f-structures automatically generated for the original CTB trees and 80.01%for NLD-recovered f-structures generated for the trees output by Bikel’s parser
Recovering non-local dependencies for Chinese
To date, work on Non-Local Dependencies (NLDs) has focused almost exclusively on English and it is an open research question how well these approaches migrate to other languages. This paper surveys non-local dependency constructions in Chinese as represented in the Penn Chinese Treebank (CTB) and provides an approach for generating
proper predicate-argument-modifier structures including NLDs from surface contextfree phrase structure trees. Our approach recovers non-local dependencies at the level
of Lexical-Functional Grammar f-structures, using automatically acquired subcategorisation frames and f-structure paths linking antecedents and traces in NLDs. Currently our algorithm achieves 92.2% f-score for trace
insertion and 84.3% for antecedent recovery evaluating on gold-standard CTB trees, and 64.7% and 54.7%, respectively, on CTBtrained state-of-the-art parser output trees
Wide-coverage deep statistical parsing using automatic dependency structure annotation
A number of researchers (Lin 1995; Carroll, Briscoe, and Sanfilippo 1998; Carroll et al. 2002; Clark and Hockenmaier 2002; King et al. 2003; Preiss 2003; Kaplan et al. 2004;Miyao and Tsujii 2004) have convincingly argued for the use of dependency (rather than CFG-tree) representations
for parser evaluation. Preiss (2003) and Kaplan et al. (2004) conducted a number of experiments comparing “deep” hand-crafted wide-coverage with “shallow” treebank- and machine-learning based parsers at the level of dependencies, using simple and automatic methods to convert tree output generated by the shallow parsers into dependencies. In this article, we revisit the experiments
in Preiss (2003) and Kaplan et al. (2004), this time using the sophisticated automatic LFG f-structure annotation methodologies of Cahill et al. (2002b, 2004) and Burke (2006), with surprising results. We compare various PCFG and history-based parsers (based on Collins, 1999; Charniak, 2000; Bikel, 2002) to find a baseline parsing system that fits best into our automatic dependency structure annotation technique. This combined system of syntactic parser and dependency structure annotation is compared to two hand-crafted, deep constraint-based parsers (Carroll and Briscoe 2002; Riezler et al. 2002). We evaluate using dependency-based gold standards (DCU 105, PARC 700, CBS 500 and dependencies for WSJ Section 22) and use the Approximate Randomization Test (Noreen 1989) to test the statistical significance of the results. Our experiments show that machine-learning-based shallow grammars augmented with sophisticated automatic dependency annotation technology outperform hand-crafted, deep, widecoverage constraint grammars. Currently our best system achieves an f-score of 82.73% against the PARC 700 Dependency Bank (King et al. 2003), a statistically significant improvement of 2.18%over the most recent results of 80.55%for the hand-crafted LFG grammar and XLE parsing system of Riezler et al. (2002), and an f-score of 80.23% against the CBS 500 Dependency Bank (Carroll, Briscoe, and Sanfilippo 1998), a statistically significant 3.66% improvement over the 76.57% achieved by the hand-crafted RASP grammar and parsing system of Carroll and
Briscoe (2002)
An improved neural network model for joint POS tagging and dependency parsing
We propose a novel neural network model for joint part-of-speech (POS)
tagging and dependency parsing. Our model extends the well-known BIST
graph-based dependency parser (Kiperwasser and Goldberg, 2016) by incorporating
a BiLSTM-based tagging component to produce automatically predicted POS tags
for the parser. On the benchmark English Penn treebank, our model obtains
strong UAS and LAS scores at 94.51% and 92.87%, respectively, producing 1.5+%
absolute improvements to the BIST graph-based parser, and also obtaining a
state-of-the-art POS tagging accuracy at 97.97%. Furthermore, experimental
results on parsing 61 "big" Universal Dependencies treebanks from raw texts
show that our model outperforms the baseline UDPipe (Straka and Strakov\'a,
2017) with 0.8% higher average POS tagging score and 3.6% higher average LAS
score. In addition, with our model, we also obtain state-of-the-art downstream
task scores for biomedical event extraction and opinion analysis applications.
Our code is available together with all pre-trained models at:
https://github.com/datquocnguyen/jPTDPComment: 11 pages; In Proceedings of the CoNLL 2018 Shared Task: Multilingual
Parsing from Raw Text to Universal Dependencies, to appea
- …