68 research outputs found
Principles of physical time directionality and fallacies of the conventional philosophy
These are the first two chapters from a monograph (The Time Flow Manifesto, Holster, 2013-14; unpublished), defending the concepts of time directionality and time flow in physics and naturalistic metaphysics, against long-standing attacks from the âconventional philosophy of physical timeâ. This monograph sets out to disprove twelve specific âfallacies of the conventional philosophyâ, stated in the first section below. These are the foundational principles of the conventional philosophy, which developed in the mid-C20th from positivist-inspired studies. The first chapter begins by re-presenting the basic analysis of time reversal symmetry in the context of probabilistic or non-deterministic processes, removing the first critical error in the conventional account. The second chapter argues for a law-like explanation of physical time asymmetry and irreversibility, and shows how the âreversibility paradoxesâ are explained
Causality in complex systems: An inferentialist proposal
I argue for an inferentialist account of the meaning of causal claims, which draws on the writings of Sellars and Brandom. The account is meant to be widely applicable. In this work, it is motivated and defended with reference to complex systems sciences, i.e., sciences that study the behaviour of systems with many components interacting at various levels of organisation (e.g. cells, brain, social groups).
Here are three, seemingly-uncontroversial platitudes about causality. (1) Causal relations are objective, mind-independent relations and, as such, analysable in objective, mind-independent terms. (2) There is a tight connection between our practice of predicting, explaining and controlling phenomena, and the use of causal notions. (3) The second platitude should be explained in terms of the first.
Contrary to this widely-held stance, I suggest that we reverse the order of analysis, by taking our activities of agents as the raw material in terms of which to account for the obtaining of causal relations. To this end, I propose and defend an inferentialist account of causality. Causality is a âcategoryâ that the knowing subject employs to âmediateâ between himself and the world. In inferentialist terms, this mediation is the result of the concept of cause figuring in a network of inferences, used in our practice of gathering evidence and using it to explain, predict and intervene. Complexity only makes the mediation more difficult, thereby rendering the meaning of causality more evident
Investigation of a Complex Space-Time Metric to Describe Precognition of the Future
Abstract. For more than 100 years scientists have attempted to determine the truth or falsity of claims that some people are able to describe and experience events or information blocked from ordinary perception. For the past 25 years, the authors of this paper- together with researchers in laboratories around the world- have carried out experiments in remote viewing. The evidence for this mode of perception, or direct knowing of distant events and objects, has convinced us of the validity of these claims. It has been widely observed that the accuracy and reliability of this sensory awareness does not diminish with either electromagnetic shielding, nor with increases in temporal or spatial separation between the percipient and the target to be described. Modern physics describes such a time-and-space independent connection between percipient and target as nonlocal. In this paper we present a geometrical model of space-time, which has already been extensively studied in the technical literature of mathematics and physics. This eight-dimensional metric is known as complex Minkowski space, " and has been shown to be consistent with our present understanding of the equations of Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, and Schrödinger. It also has the interesting property of allowing a connection of zero distance between points in the complex manifold, which appear to be separate from one another in ordinary observation. We propose a model that describes the major elements of experimental parapsychology, and at the same time is consistent with the present highly successful structure of modern physics
The Cellular Automaton Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
When investigating theories at the tiniest conceivable scales in nature,
almost all researchers today revert to the quantum language, accepting the
verdict from the Copenhagen doctrine that the only way to describe what is
going on will always involve states in Hilbert space, controlled by operator
equations. Returning to classical, that is, non quantum mechanical,
descriptions will be forever impossible, unless one accepts some extremely
contrived theoretical constructions that may or may not reproduce the quantum
mechanical phenomena observed in experiments.
Dissatisfied, this author investigated how one can look at things
differently. This book is an overview of older material, but also contains many
new observations and calculations. Quantum mechanics is looked upon as a tool,
not as a theory. Examples are displayed of models that are classical in
essence, but can be analysed by the use of quantum techniques, and we argue
that even the Standard Model, together with gravitational interactions, might
be viewed as a quantum mechanical approach to analyse a system that could be
classical at its core. We explain how such thoughts can conceivably be
reconciled with Bell's theorem, and how the usual objections voiced against the
notion of `superdeterminism' can be overcome, at least in principle. Our
proposal would eradicate the collapse problem and the measurement problem. Even
the existence of an "arrow of time" can perhaps be explained in a more elegant
way than usual.
Discussions added in v3: the role of the gravitational force, a mathematical
physics definition of free will, and an unconventional view on the arrow of
time, amongst others.Comment: 259 pages, 21 figures. Thoroughly rewritten versio
- âŠ