26,121 research outputs found
How Scale Affects Structure in Java Programs
Many internal software metrics and external quality attributes of Java
programs correlate strongly with program size. This knowledge has been used
pervasively in quantitative studies of software through practices such as
normalization on size metrics. This paper reports size-related super- and
sublinear effects that have not been known before. Findings obtained on a very
large collection of Java programs -- 30,911 projects hosted at Google Code as
of Summer 2011 -- unveils how certain characteristics of programs vary
disproportionately with program size, sometimes even non-monotonically. Many of
the specific parameters of nonlinear relations are reported. This result gives
further insights for the differences of "programming in the small" vs.
"programming in the large." The reported findings carry important consequences
for OO software metrics, and software research in general: metrics that have
been known to correlate with size can now be properly normalized so that all
the information that is left in them is size-independent.Comment: ACM Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages and
Applications (OOPSLA), October 2015. (Preprint
Symbolic and analytic techniques for resource analysis of Java bytecode
Recent work in resource analysis has translated the idea of amortised resource analysis to imperative languages using a program logic that allows mixing of assertions about heap shapes, in the tradition of separation logic, and assertions about consumable resources. Separately, polyhedral methods have been used to calculate bounds on numbers of iterations in loop-based programs. We are attempting to combine these ideas to deal with Java programs involving both data structures and loops, focusing on the bytecode level rather than on source code
Kompics: a message-passing component model for building distributed systems
The Kompics component model and programming framework was designedto simplify the development of increasingly complex distributed systems. Systems built with Kompics leverage multi-core machines out of the box and they can be dynamically reconfigured to support hot software upgrades. A simulation framework enables deterministic debugging and reproducible performance evaluation of unmodified Kompics distributed systems.
We describe the component model and show how to program and compose event-based distributed systems. We present the architectural patterns and abstractions that Kompics facilitates and we highlight a case study of a complex
distributed middleware that we have built with Kompics. We show how our approach enables systematic development and evaluation of large-scale and dynamic distributed systems
Virtual Machine Support for Many-Core Architectures: Decoupling Abstract from Concrete Concurrency Models
The upcoming many-core architectures require software developers to exploit
concurrency to utilize available computational power. Today's high-level
language virtual machines (VMs), which are a cornerstone of software
development, do not provide sufficient abstraction for concurrency concepts. We
analyze concrete and abstract concurrency models and identify the challenges
they impose for VMs. To provide sufficient concurrency support in VMs, we
propose to integrate concurrency operations into VM instruction sets.
Since there will always be VMs optimized for special purposes, our goal is to
develop a methodology to design instruction sets with concurrency support.
Therefore, we also propose a list of trade-offs that have to be investigated to
advise the design of such instruction sets.
As a first experiment, we implemented one instruction set extension for
shared memory and one for non-shared memory concurrency. From our experimental
results, we derived a list of requirements for a full-grown experimental
environment for further research
The Meaning of Memory Safety
We give a rigorous characterization of what it means for a programming
language to be memory safe, capturing the intuition that memory safety supports
local reasoning about state. We formalize this principle in two ways. First, we
show how a small memory-safe language validates a noninterference property: a
program can neither affect nor be affected by unreachable parts of the state.
Second, we extend separation logic, a proof system for heap-manipulating
programs, with a memory-safe variant of its frame rule. The new rule is
stronger because it applies even when parts of the program are buggy or
malicious, but also weaker because it demands a stricter form of separation
between parts of the program state. We also consider a number of pragmatically
motivated variations on memory safety and the reasoning principles they
support. As an application of our characterization, we evaluate the security of
a previously proposed dynamic monitor for memory safety of heap-allocated data.Comment: POST'18 final versio
JooFlux: Hijacking Java 7 InvokeDynamic To Support Live Code Modifications
Changing functional and non-functional software implementation at runtime is
useful and even sometimes critical both in development and production
environments. JooFlux is a JVM agent that allows both the dynamic replacement
of method implementations and the application of aspect advices. It works by
doing bytecode transformation to take advantage of the new invokedynamic
instruction added in Java SE 7 to help implementing dynamic languages for the
JVM. JooFlux can be managed using a JMX agent so as to operate dynamic
modifications at runtime, without resorting to a dedicated domain-specific
language. We compared JooFlux with existing AOP platforms and dynamic
languages. Results demonstrate that JooFlux performances are close to the Java
ones --- with most of the time a marginal overhead, and sometimes a gain ---
where AOP platforms and dynamic languages present significant overheads. This
paves the way for interesting future evolutions and applications of JooFlux
Mechanized semantics
The goal of this lecture is to show how modern theorem provers---in this
case, the Coq proof assistant---can be used to mechanize the specification of
programming languages and their semantics, and to reason over individual
programs and over generic program transformations, as typically found in
compilers. The topics covered include: operational semantics (small-step,
big-step, definitional interpreters); a simple form of denotational semantics;
axiomatic semantics and Hoare logic; generation of verification conditions,
with application to program proof; compilation to virtual machine code and its
proof of correctness; an example of an optimizing program transformation (dead
code elimination) and its proof of correctness
Life of occam-Pi
This paper considers some questions prompted by a brief review of the history of computing. Why is programming so hard? Why is concurrency considered an “advanced” subject? What’s the matter with Objects? Where did all the Maths go? In searching for answers, the paper looks at some concerns over fundamental ideas within object orientation (as represented by modern programming languages), before focussing on the concurrency model of communicating processes and its particular expression in the occam family of languages. In that focus, it looks at the history of occam, its underlying philosophy (Ockham’s Razor), its semantic foundation on Hoare’s CSP, its principles of process oriented design and its development over almost three decades into occam-? (which blends in the concurrency dynamics of Milner’s ?-calculus). Also presented will be an urgent need for rationalisation – occam-? is an experiment that has demonstrated significant results, but now needs time to be spent on careful review and implementing the conclusions of that review. Finally, the future is considered. In particular, is there a future
- …