959 research outputs found
Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker
Machine learning analysis of neuroimaging data can accurately predict chronological age in healthy people. Deviations from healthy brain ageing have been associated with cognitive impairment and disease. Here we sought to further establish the credentials of ‘brain-predicted age’ as a biomarker of individual differences in the brain ageing process, using a predictive modelling approach based on deep learning, and specifically convolutional neural networks (CNN), and applied to both pre-processed and raw T1-weighted MRI data.
Firstly, we aimed to demonstrate the accuracy of CNN brain-predicted age using a large dataset of healthy adults (N = 2001). Next, we sought to establish the heritability of brain-predicted age using a sample of monozygotic and dizygotic female twins (N = 62). Thirdly, we examined the test-retest and multi-centre reliability of brain-predicted age using two samples (within-scanner N = 20; between-scanner N = 11). CNN brain-predicted ages were generated and compared to a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) approach, on all datasets. Input data were grey matter (GM) or white matter (WM) volumetric maps generated by Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) or raw data.
CNN accurately predicted chronological age using GM (correlation between brain-predicted age and chronological age r = 0.96, mean absolute error [MAE] = 4.16 years) and raw (r = 0.94, MAE = 4.65 years) data. This was comparable to GPR brain-predicted age using GM data (r = 0.95, MAE = 4.66 years). Brain-predicted age was a heritable phenotype for all models and input data (h2 ≥ 0.5). Brain-predicted age showed high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.90–0.99). Multi-centre reliability was more variable within high ICCs for GM (0.83–0.96) and poor-moderate levels for WM and raw data (0.51–0.77).
Brain-predicted age represents an accurate, highly reliable and genetically-influenced phenotype, that has potential to be used as a biomarker of brain ageing. Moreover, age predictions can be accurately generated on raw T1-MRI data, substantially reducing computation time for novel data, bringing the process closer to giving real-time information on brain health in clinical settings
Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker.
Machine learning analysis of neuroimaging data can accurately predict chronological age in healthy people. Deviations from healthy brain ageing have been associated with cognitive impairment and disease. Here we sought to further establish the credentials of 'brain-predicted age' as a biomarker of individual differences in the brain ageing process, using a predictive modelling approach based on deep learning, and specifically convolutional neural networks (CNN), and applied to both pre-processed and raw T1-weighted MRI data. Firstly, we aimed to demonstrate the accuracy of CNN brain-predicted age using a large dataset of healthy adults (N = 2001). Next, we sought to establish the heritability of brain-predicted age using a sample of monozygotic and dizygotic female twins (N = 62). Thirdly, we examined the test-retest and multi-centre reliability of brain-predicted age using two samples (within-scanner N = 20; between-scanner N = 11). CNN brain-predicted ages were generated and compared to a Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) approach, on all datasets. Input data were grey matter (GM) or white matter (WM) volumetric maps generated by Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) or raw data. CNN accurately predicted chronological age using GM (correlation between brain-predicted age and chronological age r = 0.96, mean absolute error [MAE] = 4.16 years) and raw (r = 0.94, MAE = 4.65 years) data. This was comparable to GPR brain-predicted age using GM data (r = 0.95, MAE = 4.66 years). Brain-predicted age was a heritable phenotype for all models and input data (h(2) ≥ 0.5). Brain-predicted age showed high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.90-0.99). Multi-centre reliability was more variable within high ICCs for GM (0.83-0.96) and poor-moderate levels for WM and raw data (0.51-0.77). Brain-predicted age represents an accurate, highly reliable and genetically-influenced phenotype, that has potential to be used as a biomarker of brain ageing. Moreover, age predictions can be accurately generated on raw T1-MRI data, substantially reducing computation time for novel data, bringing the process closer to giving real-time information on brain health in clinical settings
Brain Age from the Electroencephalogram of Sleep
The human electroencephalogram (EEG) of sleep undergoes profound changes with
age. These changes can be conceptualized as "brain age", which can be compared
to an age norm to reflect the deviation from normal aging process. Here, we
develop an interpretable machine learning model to predict brain age based on
two large sleep EEG datasets: the Massachusetts General Hospital sleep lab
dataset (MGH, N = 2,621) covering age 18 to 80; and the Sleep Hearth Health
Study (SHHS, N = 3,520) covering age 40 to 80. The model obtains a mean
absolute deviation of 8.1 years between brain age and chronological age in the
healthy participants in the MGH dataset. As validation, we analyze a subset of
SHHS containing longitudinal EEGs 5 years apart, which shows a 5.5 years
difference in brain age. Participants with neurological and psychiatric
diseases, as well as diabetes and hypertension medications show an older brain
age compared to chronological age. The findings raise the prospect of using
sleep EEG as a biomarker for healthy brain aging
Does pre-training on brain-related tasks results in better deep-learning-based brain age biomarkers?
Brain age prediction using neuroimaging data has shown great potential as an
indicator of overall brain health and successful aging, as well as a disease
biomarker. Deep learning models have been established as reliable and efficient
brain age estimators, being trained to predict the chronological age of healthy
subjects. In this paper, we investigate the impact of a pre-training step on
deep learning models for brain age prediction. More precisely, instead of the
common approach of pre-training on natural imaging classification, we propose
pre-training the models on brain-related tasks, which led to state-of-the-art
results in our experiments on ADNI data. Furthermore, we validate the resulting
brain age biomarker on images of patients with mild cognitive impairment and
Alzheimer's disease. Interestingly, our results indicate that better-performing
deep learning models in terms of brain age prediction on healthy patients do
not result in more reliable biomarkers.Comment: Accepted at BRACIS 202
Brain Structure Ages -- A new biomarker for multi-disease classification
Age is an important variable to describe the expected brain's anatomy status
across the normal aging trajectory. The deviation from that normative aging
trajectory may provide some insights into neurological diseases. In
neuroimaging, predicted brain age is widely used to analyze different diseases.
However, using only the brain age gap information (\ie the difference between
the chronological age and the estimated age) can be not enough informative for
disease classification problems. In this paper, we propose to extend the notion
of global brain age by estimating brain structure ages using structural
magnetic resonance imaging. To this end, an ensemble of deep learning models is
first used to estimate a 3D aging map (\ie voxel-wise age estimation). Then, a
3D segmentation mask is used to obtain the final brain structure ages. This
biomarker can be used in several situations. First, it enables to accurately
estimate the brain age for the purpose of anomaly detection at the population
level. In this situation, our approach outperforms several state-of-the-art
methods. Second, brain structure ages can be used to compute the deviation from
the normal aging process of each brain structure. This feature can be used in a
multi-disease classification task for an accurate differential diagnosis at the
subject level. Finally, the brain structure age deviations of individuals can
be visualized, providing some insights about brain abnormality and helping
clinicians in real medical contexts
- …