2 research outputs found

    Predicting Relevance Scores for Triples from Type-Like Relations using Neural Embedding - The Cabbage Triple Scorer at WSDM Cup 2017

    Full text link
    The WSDM Cup 2017 Triple scoring challenge is aimed at calculating and assigning relevance scores for triples from type-like relations. Such scores are a fundamental ingredient for ranking results in entity search. In this paper, we propose a method that uses neural embedding techniques to accurately calculate an entity score for a triple based on its nearest neighbor. We strive to develop a new latent semantic model with a deep structure that captures the semantic and syntactic relations between words. Our method has been ranked among the top performers with accuracy - 0.74, average score difference - 1.74, and average Kendall's Tau - 0.35.Comment: Triple Scorer at WSDM Cup 2017, see arXiv:1712.0808

    Overview of the Triple Scoring Task at the WSDM Cup 2017

    Full text link
    This paper provides an overview of the triple scoring task at the WSDM Cup 2017, including a description of the task and the dataset, an overview of the participating teams and their results, and a brief account of the methods employed. In a nutshell, the task was to compute relevance scores for knowledge-base triples from relations, where such scores make sense. Due to the way the ground truth was constructed, scores were required to be integers from the range 0..7. For example, reasonable scores for the triples "Tim Burton profession Director" and "Tim Burton profession Actor" would be 7 and 2, respectively, because Tim Burton is well-known as a director, but he acted only in a few lesser known movies. The triple scoring task attracted considerable interest, with 52 initial registrations and 21 teams who submitted a valid run before the deadline. The winning team achieved an accuracy of 87%, that is, for that fraction of the triples from the test set (which was revealed only after the deadline) the difference to the score from the ground truth was at most 2. The best result for the average difference from the test set scores was 1.50
    corecore