9,172 research outputs found
GPUVerify: A Verifier for GPU Kernels
We present a technique for verifying race- and divergence-freedom of GPU kernels that are written in mainstream ker-nel programming languages such as OpenCL and CUDA. Our approach is founded on a novel formal operational se-mantics for GPU programming termed synchronous, delayed visibility (SDV) semantics. The SDV semantics provides a precise definition of barrier divergence in GPU kernels and allows kernel verification to be reduced to analysis of a sequential program, thereby completely avoiding the need to reason about thread interleavings, and allowing existing modular techniques for program verification to be leveraged. We describe an efficient encoding for data race detection and propose a method for automatically inferring loop invari-ants required for verification. We have implemented these techniques as a practical verification tool, GPUVerify, which can be applied directly to OpenCL and CUDA source code. We evaluate GPUVerify with respect to a set of 163 kernels drawn from public and commercial sources. Our evaluation demonstrates that GPUVerify is capable of efficient, auto-matic verification of a large number of real-world kernels
Data Race Detection in the Linux Kernel with CPALockator
Most of the state-of-the-art verification tools do not scale well on complicated software. Our goal was to develop a tool, which becomes a golden mean between precise and slow software model checkers and fast and imprecise static analyzers.It allows verifying industrial software more efficiently.Our method is based on the Thread-Modular approach elaborating the idea of abstraction from precise thread interaction and considering every thread separately, but in a special environment, which models thread effects on each other.The approach was implemented in the CPAchecker framework and was evaluated on benchmarks based on Linux device drivers for data race detection. It demonstrated that predicate abstraction allows keeping a false alarms rate at a reasonable level of 52\%. Moreover, it did not miss known real bugs found by analysis of commits in the Linux kernel repository thus confirming the soundness of the approach
Abstract Interpretation with Unfoldings
We present and evaluate a technique for computing path-sensitive interference
conditions during abstract interpretation of concurrent programs. In lieu of
fixed point computation, we use prime event structures to compactly represent
causal dependence and interference between sequences of transformers. Our main
contribution is an unfolding algorithm that uses a new notion of independence
to avoid redundant transformer application, thread-local fixed points to reduce
the size of the unfolding, and a novel cutoff criterion based on subsumption to
guarantee termination of the analysis. Our experiments show that the abstract
unfolding produces an order of magnitude fewer false alarms than a mature
abstract interpreter, while being several orders of magnitude faster than
solver-based tools that have the same precision.Comment: Extended version of the paper (with the same title and authors) to
appear at CAV 201
Pointer Race Freedom
We propose a novel notion of pointer race for concurrent programs
manipulating a shared heap. A pointer race is an access to a memory address
which was freed, and it is out of the accessor's control whether or not the
cell has been re-allocated. We establish two results. (1) Under the assumption
of pointer race freedom, it is sound to verify a program running under explicit
memory management as if it was running with garbage collection. (2) Even the
requirement of pointer race freedom itself can be verified under the
garbage-collected semantics. We then prove analogues of the theorems for a
stronger notion of pointer race needed to cope with performance-critical code
purposely using racy comparisons and even racy dereferences of pointers. As a
practical contribution, we apply our results to optimize a thread-modular
analysis under explicit memory management. Our experiments confirm a speed-up
of up to two orders of magnitude
Steps in modular specifications for concurrent modules
Ā© 2015 Published by Elsevier B.V.The specification of a concurrent program module is a difficult problem. The specifications must be strong enough to enable reasoning about the intended clients without reference to the underlying module implementation. We survey a range of verification techniques for specifying concurrent modules, in particular highlighting four key concepts: auxiliary state, interference abstraction, resource ownership and atomicity. We show how these concepts combine to provide powerful approaches to specifying concurrent modules
Modular Verification of Interrupt-Driven Software
Interrupts have been widely used in safety-critical computer systems to
handle outside stimuli and interact with the hardware, but reasoning about
interrupt-driven software remains a difficult task. Although a number of static
verification techniques have been proposed for interrupt-driven software, they
often rely on constructing a monolithic verification model. Furthermore, they
do not precisely capture the complete execution semantics of interrupts such as
nested invocations of interrupt handlers. To overcome these limitations, we
propose an abstract interpretation framework for static verification of
interrupt-driven software that first analyzes each interrupt handler in
isolation as if it were a sequential program, and then propagates the result to
other interrupt handlers. This iterative process continues until results from
all interrupt handlers reach a fixed point. Since our method never constructs
the global model, it avoids the up-front blowup in model construction that
hampers existing, non-modular, verification techniques. We have evaluated our
method on 35 interrupt-driven applications with a total of 22,541 lines of
code. Our results show the method is able to quickly and more accurately
analyze the behavior of interrupts.Comment: preprint of the ASE 2017 pape
Procedure-modular specification and verification of temporal safety properties
This paper describes ProMoVer, a tool for fully automated procedure-modular verification of Java programs equipped with method-local and global assertions that specify safety properties of sequences of method invocations. Modularity at the procedure-level is a natural instantiation of the modular verification paradigm, where correctness of global properties is relativized on the local properties of the methods rather than on their implementations. Here, it is based on the construction of maximal models for a program model that abstracts away from program data. This approach allows global properties to be verified in the presence of code evolution, multiple method implementations (as arising from software product lines), or even unknown method implementations (as in mobile code for open platforms). ProMoVer automates a typical verification scenario for a previously developed tool set for compositional verification of control flow safety properties, and provides appropriate pre- and post-processing. Both linear-time temporal logic and finite automata are supported as formalisms for expressing local and global safety properties, allowing the user to choose a suitable format for the property at hand. Modularity is exploited by a mechanism for proof reuse that detects and minimizes the verification tasks resulting from changes in the code and the specifications. The verification task is relatively light-weight due to support for abstraction from private methods and automatic extraction of candidate specifications from method implementations. We evaluate the tool on a number of applications from the domains of Java Card and web-based application
Software Model Checking with Explicit Scheduler and Symbolic Threads
In many practical application domains, the software is organized into a set
of threads, whose activation is exclusive and controlled by a cooperative
scheduling policy: threads execute, without any interruption, until they either
terminate or yield the control explicitly to the scheduler. The formal
verification of such software poses significant challenges. On the one side,
each thread may have infinite state space, and might call for abstraction. On
the other side, the scheduling policy is often important for correctness, and
an approach based on abstracting the scheduler may result in loss of precision
and false positives. Unfortunately, the translation of the problem into a
purely sequential software model checking problem turns out to be highly
inefficient for the available technologies. We propose a software model
checking technique that exploits the intrinsic structure of these programs.
Each thread is translated into a separate sequential program and explored
symbolically with lazy abstraction, while the overall verification is
orchestrated by the direct execution of the scheduler. The approach is
optimized by filtering the exploration of the scheduler with the integration of
partial-order reduction. The technique, called ESST (Explicit Scheduler,
Symbolic Threads) has been implemented and experimentally evaluated on a
significant set of benchmarks. The results demonstrate that ESST technique is
way more effective than software model checking applied to the sequentialized
programs, and that partial-order reduction can lead to further performance
improvements.Comment: 40 pages, 10 figures, accepted for publication in journal of logical
methods in computer scienc
- ā¦