Precise Regulation of Gene Expression Dynamics Favors Complex Promoter Architectures

Promoters process signals through recruitment of transcription factors and RNA polymerase, and dynamic changes in promoter activity constitute a major noise source in gene expression. However, it is barely understood how complex promoter architectures determine key features of promoter dynamics. Here, we employ prototypical promoters of yeast ribosomal protein genes as well as simplified versions thereof to analyze the relations among promoter design, complexity, and function. These promoters combine the action of a general regulatory factor with that of specific transcription factors, a common motif of many eukaryotic promoters. By comprehensively analyzing stationary and dynamic promoter properties, this model-based approach enables us to pinpoint the structural characteristics underlying the observed behavior. Functional tradeoffs impose constraints on the promoter architecture of ribosomal protein genes. We find that a stable scaffold in the natural design results in low transcriptional noise and strong co-regulation of target genes in the presence of gene silencing. This configuration also exhibits superior shut-off properties, and it can serve as a tunable switch in living cells. Model validation with independent experimental data suggests that the models are sufficiently realistic. When combined, our results offer a mechanistic explanation for why specific factors are associated with low protein noise in vivo. Many of these findings hold for a broad range of model parameters and likely apply to other eukaryotic promoters of similar structure

Effect of promoter architecture on the cell-to-cell variability in gene expression

According to recent experimental evidence, the architecture of a promoter, defined as the number, strength and regulatory role of the operators that control the promoter, plays a major role in determining the level of cell-to-cell variability in gene expression. These quantitative experiments call for a corresponding modeling effort that addresses the question of how changes in promoter architecture affect noise in gene expression in a systematic rather than case-by-case fashion. In this article, we make such a systematic investigation, based on a simple microscopic model of gene regulation that incorporates stochastic effects. In particular, we show how operator strength and operator multiplicity affect this variability. We examine different modes of transcription factor binding to complex promoters (cooperative, independent, simultaneous) and how each of these affects the level of variability in transcription product from cell-to-cell. We propose that direct comparison between in vivo single-cell experiments and theoretical predictions for the moments of the probability distribution of mRNA number per cell can discriminate between different kinetic models of gene regulation.Comment: 35 pages, 6 figures, Submitte

Noise and information transmission in promoters with multiple internal states

Based on the measurements of noise in gene expression performed during the last decade, it has become customary to think of gene regulation in terms of a two-state model, where the promoter of a gene can stochastically switch between an ON and an OFF state. As experiments are becoming increasingly precise and the deviations from the two-state model start to be observable, we ask about the experimental signatures of complex multi-state promoters, as well as the functional consequences of this additional complexity. In detail, we (i) extend the calculations for noise in gene expression to promoters described by state transition diagrams with multiple states, (ii) systematically compute the experimentally accessible noise characteristics for these complex promoters, and (iii) use information theory to evaluate the channel capacities of complex promoter architectures and compare them to the baseline provided by the two-state model. We find that adding internal states to the promoter generically decreases channel capacity, except in certain cases, three of which (cooperativity, dual-role regulation, promoter cycling) we analyze in detail.Comment: 16 pages, 9 figure

Distinct Mechanisms for Induction and Tolerance Regulate the Immediate Early Genes Encoding Interleukin 1β and Tumor Necrosis Factor α

Interleukin-1β and Tumor Necrosis Factor α play related, but distinct, roles in immunity and disease. Our study revealed major mechanistic distinctions in the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling-dependent induction for the rapidly expressed genes (IL1B and TNF) coding for these two cytokines. Prior to induction, TNF exhibited pre-bound TATA Binding Protein (TBP) and paused RNA Polymerase II (Pol II), hallmarks of poised immediate-early (IE) genes. In contrast, unstimulated IL1B displayed very low levels of both TBP and paused Pol II, requiring the lineage-specific Spi-1/PU.1 (Spi1) transcription factor as an anchor for induction-dependent interaction with two TLR-activated transcription factors, C/EBPβ and NF-κB. Activation and DNA binding of these two pre-expressed factors resulted in de novo recruitment of TBP and Pol II to IL1B in concert with a permissive state for elongation mediated by the recruitment of elongation factor P-TEFb. This Spi1-dependent mechanism for IL1B transcription, which is unique for a rapidly-induced/poised IE gene, was more dependent upon P-TEFb than was the case for the TNF gene. Furthermore, the dependence on phosphoinositide 3-kinase for P-TEFb recruitment to IL1B paralleled a greater sensitivity to the metabolic state of the cell and a lower sensitivity to the phenomenon of endotoxin tolerance than was evident for TNF. Such differences in induction mechanisms argue against the prevailing paradigm that all IE genes possess paused Pol II and may further delineate the specific roles played by each of these rapidly expressed immune modulators. © 2013 Adamik et al

Tuning transcriptional regulation through signaling: A predictive theory of allosteric induction

Allosteric regulation is found across all domains of life, yet we still lack simple, predictive theories that directly link the experimentally tunable parameters of a system to its input-output response. To that end, we present a general theory of allosteric transcriptional regulation using the Monod-Wyman-Changeux model. We rigorously test this model using the ubiquitous simple repression motif in bacteria by first predicting the behavior of strains that span a large range of repressor copy numbers and DNA binding strengths and then constructing and measuring their response. Our model not only accurately captures the induction profiles of these strains but also enables us to derive analytic expressions for key properties such as the dynamic range and $[EC_{50}]$. Finally, we derive an expression for the free energy of allosteric repressors which enables us to collapse our experimental data onto a single master curve that captures the diverse phenomenology of the induction profiles.Comment: Substantial revisions for resubmission (3 new figures, significantly elaborated discussion); added Professor Mitchell Lewis as another author for his continuing contributions to the projec

Multistable Decision Switches for Flexible Control of Epigenetic Differentiation

It is now recognized that molecular circuits with positive feedback can induce two different gene expression states (bistability) under the very same cellular conditions. Whether, and how, cells make use of the coexistence of a larger number of stable states (multistability) is however largely unknown. Here, we first examine how autoregulation, a common attribute of genetic master regulators, facilitates multistability in two-component circuits. A systematic exploration of these modules' parameter space reveals two classes of molecular switches, involving transitions in bistable (progression switches) or multistable (decision switches) regimes. We demonstrate the potential of decision switches for multifaceted stimulus processing, including strength, duration, and flexible discrimination. These tasks enhance response specificity, help to store short-term memories of recent signaling events, stabilize transient gene expression, and enable stochastic fate commitment. The relevance of these circuits is further supported by biological data, because we find them in numerous developmental scenarios. Indeed, many of the presented information-processing features of decision switches could ultimately demonstrate a more flexible control of epigenetic differentiation

The Influence of Promoter Architectures and Regulatory Motifs on Gene Expression in Escherichia coli

The ability to regulate gene expression is of central importance for the adaptability of living organisms to changes in their external and internal environment. At the transcriptional level, binding of transcription factors (TFs) in the promoter region can modulate the transcription rate, hence making TFs central players in gene regulation. For some model organisms, information about the locations and identities of discovered TF binding sites have been collected in continually updated databases, such as RegulonDB for the well-studied case of E. coli. In order to reveal the general principles behind the binding-site arrangement and function of these regulatory architectures we propose a random promoter architecture model that preserves the overall abundance of binding sites to identify overrepresented binding site configurations. This model is analogous to the random network model used in the study of genetic network motifs, where regulatory motifs are identified through their overrepresentation with respect to a “randomly connected” genetic network. Using our model we identify TF pairs which coregulate operons in an overrepresented fashion, or individual TFs which act at multiple binding sites per promoter by, for example, cooperative binding, DNA looping, or through multiple binding domains. We furthermore explore the relationship between promoter architecture and gene expression, using three different genome-wide protein copy number censuses. Perhaps surprisingly, we find no systematic correlation between the number of activator and repressor binding sites regulating a gene and the level of gene expression. A position-weight-matrix model used to estimate the binding affinity of RNA polymerase (RNAP) to the promoters of activated and repressed genes suggests that this lack of correlation might in part be due to differences in basal transcription levels, with repressed genes having a higher basal activity level. This quantitative catalogue relating promoter architecture and function provides a first step towards genome-wide predictive models of regulatory function

IST Austria Thesis

The process of gene expression is central to the modern understanding of how cellular systems function. In this process, a special kind of regulatory proteins, called transcription factors, are important to determine how much protein is produced from a given gene. As biological information is transmitted from transcription factor concentration to mRNA levels to amounts of protein, various sources of noise arise and pose limits to the fidelity of intracellular signaling. This thesis concerns itself with several aspects of stochastic gene expression: (i) the mathematical description of complex promoters responsible for the stochastic production of biomolecules, (ii) fundamental limits to information processing the cell faces due to the interference from multiple fluctuating signals, (iii) how the presence of gene expression noise influences the evolution of regulatory sequences, (iv) and tools for the experimental study of origins and consequences of cell-cell heterogeneity, including an application to bacterial stress response systems

Spatiotemporal control of gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans

Cell-type specific regulation of transcription drives the production of the myriad of different cells generated during development. Profiling genome-wide gene expression landscapes in different tissues has improved our understanding of the physiological and pathological processes taking place during development. Yet, the mechanisms underlying cell-type specific transcription are not well understood. Promoters and enhancers are the key loci that orchestrate spatiotemporal patterns of gene expression. Their activities can range from ubiquitous to highly cell-type specific, and their composition and arrangement define the regulatory grammar directing gene transcription across development. More comprehensive in vivo studies of these regulatory grammars would improve our understanding of how different patterns of gene expression are obtained across tissues. Caenorhabditis elegans is an important model organism for studying develop- mental processes. At the beginning of my PhD, I helped characterize the dynamics of gene expression and chromatin activity across development and aging. Follow- ing this, I aimed to identify and characterize the regulatory elements involved in tissue-specific control of transcription in C. elegans. I jointly profiled chromatin accessibility and gene expression landscapes across the five main tissues of the adult nematode. To achieve this, I developed a method to sort fluorescently labelled nuclei from individual C. elegans tissues. Analyzing the datasets I generated, I first showed that around 80% of the regulatory elements in C. elegans are specifically active in subsets of tissues. I then revealed fundamental differences in the genetic structure and regulatory architecture of genes expressed ubiquitously or in individual tissues, and I defined two distinctive regulatory grammars associated with specific sets of genes. I also uncovered striking and unsuspected differences in nucleosome arrangement and sequence features of ubiquitous and germline-specific promoters compared to somatic promoters. Finally, I optimized a single nucleus method to analyze chromatin accessibility and gene expression during embryogenesis and did a pilot study of early embryo development. My work provides a comprehensive resource of chromatin accessibility and transcription patterns in the different tissues of C. elegans. It sheds light on fundamental differences between the mechanisms of transcription regulation of germline-active genes or somatic tissue-specific genes. The outcome of this work will greatly enable and push forward C. elegans transcription regulation research. The first datasets jointly profiling chromatin accessibility and nuclear transcription across the majority of tissues in a multicellular organism will also be of benefit for the broader community studying gene regulation in eukaryotes