Towards Parameterized Regular Type Inference Using Set Constraints

We propose a method for inferring \emph{parameterized regular types} for logic programs as solutions for systems of constraints over sets of finite ground Herbrand terms (set constraint systems). Such parameterized regular types generalize \emph{parametric} regular types by extending the scope of the parameters in the type definitions so that such parameters can relate the types of different predicates. We propose a number of enhancements to the procedure for solving the constraint systems that improve the precision of the type descriptions inferred. The resulting algorithm, together with a procedure to establish a set constraint system from a logic program, yields a program analysis that infers tighter safe approximations of the success types of the program than previous comparable work, offering a new and useful efficiency vs. precision trade-off. This is supported by experimental results, which show the feasibility of our analysis

Inference of Well-Typings for Logic Programs with Application to Termination Analysis

This paper develops a method to infer a polymorphic well-typing for a logic program. One of the main motivations is to contribute to a better automation of termination analysis in logic programs, by deriving types from which norms can automatically be constructed. Previous work on type-based termination analysis used either types declared by the user, or automatically generated monomorphic types describing the success set of predicates. Declared types are typically more precise and result in stronger termination conditions than those obtained with inferred types. Our type inference procedure involves solving set constraints generated from the program and derives a well-typing in contrast to a success-set approximation. Experiments show that our automatically inferred well-typings are close to the declared types and thus result in termination conditions that are as good as those obtained with declared types for all our experiments to date. We describe the method, its implementation and experiments with termination analysis based on the inferred types

A Falsification View of Success Typing

Dynamic languages are praised for their flexibility and expressiveness, but static analysis often yields many false positives and verification is cumbersome for lack of structure. Hence, unit testing is the prevalent incomplete method for validating programs in such languages. Falsification is an alternative approach that uncovers definite errors in programs. A falsifier computes a set of inputs that definitely crash a program. Success typing is a type-based approach to document programs in dynamic languages. We demonstrate that success typing is, in fact, an instance of falsification by mapping success (input) types into suitable logic formulae. Output types are represented by recursive types. We prove the correctness of our mapping (which establishes that success typing is falsification) and we report some experiences with a prototype implementation.Comment: extended versio

Implementing Compositional Analysis Using Intersection Types With Expansion Variables

AbstractA program analysis is compositional when the analysis result for a particular program fragment is obtained solely from the results for its immediate subfragments via some composition operator. This means the subfragments can be analyzed independently in any order. Many commonly used program analysis techniques (in particular, most abstract interpretations and most uses of the Hindley/Milner type system) are not compositional and require the entire text of a program for sound and complete analysis.System I is a recent type system for the pure λ-calculus with intersection types and the new technology of expansion variables. System I supports compositional analysis because it has the principal typings property and an algorithm based on the new technology of β-unification has been developed that finds these principal typings. In addition, for each natural number k, typability in the rank-k restriction of System I is decidable, so a complete and terminating analysis algorithm exists for the rank-k restriction.This paper presents new understanding that has been gained from working with multiple implementations of System I and β-unification-based analysis algorithms. The previous literature on System I presented the type system in a way that helped in proving its more important theoretical properties, but was not as easy to follow as it could be. This paper provides a presentation of many aspects of System I that should be clearer as well as a discussion of important implementation issues

A Web-based Tool Combining Different Type Analyses

Abstract. There are various kinds of type analysis of logic programs. These in-clude for example inference of types that describe an over-approximation of the success set of a program, inference of well-typings, and abstractions based on given types. Analyses can be descriptive or prescriptive or a mixture of both, and they can be goal-dependent or goal-independent. We describe a prototype tool that can be accessed from a web browser, allowing various type analyses to be run. The first goal of the tool is to allow the analysis results to be examined conveniently by clicking on points in the original program clauses, and to highlight ill-typed pro-gram constructs, empty types or other type anomalies. Secondly the tool allows combination of the various styles of analysis. For example, a descriptive regular type can be automatically inferred for a given program, and then that type can be used to generate the minimal “domain model ” of the program with respect to the corresponding pre-interpretation, which can give more precise information than the original descriptive type.