The contribution of closed loop tracking control of motion platform on laterally induced postural instability of the drivers at SAAM dynamic simulator

This paper explains the effect of a motion platform closed loop control comparing to the static condition for driving simulators on postural instability. The postural instabilities of the participants (N=18, 15 male and 3 female subjects) were measured as lateral displacements of subject body centre of pressure (YCP ) just before and after each driving session via a balance platform. After having completed the experiments, the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test was applied to analyze the objective data for merely the post-exposure cases. The objective data analysis revealed that the YCP for the dynamic case indicated a significant lower value than the static situation (U(18), p < 0,0001). It can be concluded that the closed loop tracking control of the hexapod platform of the driving simulator (dynamic platform condition) decreased significantly the lateral postural stability compared to the static operation condition. However the two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test showed that no significant difference was obtained between the two conditions in terms of psychophysical perception

I Am The Passenger: How Visual Motion Cues Can Influence Sickness For In-Car VR

This paper explores the use of VR Head Mounted Displays (HMDs) in-car and in-motion for the first time. Immersive HMDs are becoming everyday consumer items and, as they offer new possibilities for entertainment and productivity, people will want to use them during travel in, for example, autonomous cars. However, their use is confounded by motion sickness caused in-part by the restricted visual perception of motion conflicting with physically perceived vehicle motion (accelerations/rotations detected by the vestibular system). Whilst VR HMDs restrict visual perception of motion, they could also render it virtually, potentially alleviating sensory conflict. To study this problem, we conducted the first on-road and in motion study to systematically investigate the effects of various visual presentations of the real-world motion of a car on the sickness and immersion of VR HMD wearing passengers. We established new baselines for VR in-car motion sickness, and found that there is no one best presentation with respect to balancing sickness and immersion. Instead, user preferences suggest different solutions are required for differently susceptible users to provide usable VR in-car. This work provides formative insights for VR designers and an entry point for further research into enabling use of VR HMDs, and the rich experiences they offer, when travelling

Virtual reality and postural control: The virtual moving room paradigm

Virtual reality (VR) is becoming increasingly important in balance training. However, the influence of VR generated visual perturbation, through the novel virtual moving room paradigm, is unknown. Thirty healthy individuals had their static balance assessed on a BTrackS balance plate under eight different conditions: baseline eyes open and eyes closed with and without VR, unexpected toward and away moving VR perturbation, and expected toward and away moving VR perturbation. Multiple statistical analyses were conducted, and the results revealed significantly higher postural sway variables in the unexpected moving toward trials compared to the other moving room conditions; significantly higher postural sway variables in the eyes open no VR compared to VR; and significantly higher postural sway variables in the eyes closed no VR compared to VR. This study provides evidence that VR can be used as a safe and low-cost balance training tool by exposing individuals to fall-prone situations and increasing their balance confidence

Effects of Head Motion on Postural Stability in Participants with Chronic Motion Sensitivity

Background: Motion sensitivity, or motion sickness, is common among individuals in modern vehicular and visually stimulating environments; notably, people with normal vestibular function are susceptible to this condition. Motion-provoked dizziness often causes postural instability. Purposes: This study aimed to compare the effects of head motion on postural stability in healthy adults with and without chronic motion sensitivity (CMS) and to determine the effects of head motion direction (horizontal versus vertical) on postural stability. Methods: Sixty healthy adult males and females aged 20 to 40 years old were assigned to two groups, 30 participants with CMS and 30 participants without CMS. Pre-data collection, all participants were trained on specific parameters of cervical rotation, flexion, and extension. Then, postural stability measurements were taken during three conditions (static, horizontal, and vertical head movements) using the Bertec Balance Advantage Dynamic Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP). Results: There was a significant difference between the CMS and non-CMS groups in mean postural stability during head movement in both horizontal and vertical head motions (p = 0.005 and p = 0.024, respectively); however, no significant difference was shown in mean postural stability between horizontal and vertical head motions within each group (p = 0.297 in CMS group and p = 0.179 in non-CMS group). Conclusions: The results indicate that healthy young adults without CMS have better postural stability during head motion than those with CMS, and that head motion direction (horizontal versus vertical) does not influence postural stability within each study group

Effect of Vestibular Adaptation Exercises on Chronic Motion Sensitivity

Dizziness is one of the most common complaints reported to primary care physicians. It is often associated with vestibular dysfunction and typically impacts postural stability. Motion sickness, or motion sensitivity, is stimulated by abnormal spatial orientation and is a common symptom related to dizziness and postural instability. The main cause of the motion sensitivity is aberrant sensory input from the visual, vestibular and somatosensory systems. The aim of this study was to measure the effect of vestibular adaptation exercises on postural stability in young healthy adults with subjective awareness of chronic motion sensitivity. Methods: Fifty healthy male and female participants between 20 to 40 years of age with chronic motion sensitivity were randomly assigned to either an experimental or control group. Postural stability measurements were taken at baseline and after 6 weeks using computerized dynamic posturography with immersion virtual reality. The experimental group performed daily vestibular adaptation exercises for 6 weeks. Results. There was no significant difference between the two groups at baseline in terms of mean age, height, weight, BMI or baseline postural stability scores (p\u3e0.05). Significant differences in mean postural stability scores were observed post intervention in both groups but larger improvements were detected in the experimental group (p=0.002). Conclusions: Minimal dosage of vestibular adaptation exercises improved postural stability in younger adults with chronic motion sensitivity. Additionally, familiarity of the testing environment during post-test measurements may have contributed to improvements in the control group over time; however, changes were greater in the experimental group

가상현실에서 몸의 자세와 공간인지, 공간이동방법, 존재감, 사이버멀미의 상호작용에 대한 연구

학위논문 (박사) -- 서울대학교 대학원 : 인문대학 협동과정 인지과학전공, 2021. 2. 이경민.가상현실은 몸과 마음이 공간에 함께 존재한다는 일상적 경험에 대해 새로운 관점을 제시한다. 컴퓨터로 매개된 커뮤니케이션에서 많은 경우 사용자들은 몸은 배제되며 마음의 존재가 중요하다고 느끼게 된다. 이와 관련하여 가상현실은 사용자들에게 커뮤니케이션에 있어 물리적 몸의 역할과 비체화된 상호작용의 중요성에 대해 연구할 수 있는 기회를 제공한다. 기존 연구에 의하면 실행, 주의집중, 기억, 지각과 같은 인지기능들이 몸의 자세에 따라 다르게 작용한다고 한다. 하지만 이와 같은 인지기능들과 몸 자세의 상호연관성은 여전히 명확히 밝혀지고 있지 않다. 특히 가상현실에서 몸의 자세가 지각반응에 대한 인지과정에 어떤 작용을 하는지에 대한 이해는 매우 부족한 상황이다. 가상현실 연구자들은 존재감을 가상현실의 핵심 개념으로 정의하였으며 효율적인 가상현실 시스템 구성과 밀접한 관계가 있다고 한다. 존재감은 가상공간에 있다고 느끼는 의식상태를 말한다. 구체적으로 가상현실 속 경험을 실재 존재한다고 느끼는 의식상태를 말한다. 이런 존재감이 높을 수록 현실처럼 인지하기에 존재감은 가상현실 경험을 측정하는 중요한 지표이다. 따라서 가상공간에 존재하고 있다는 의식적 경험 ((거기에 있다(being there)), 즉 존재감은 매개된 가상경험들의 인지 연구에 중요한 개념이다. 가상현실은 사이버멀미를 유발하는 것으로 알려져 있다. 이 증상은 가상현실의 사용성을 제약하는 주요 요인으로 효과적인 가상현실 경험을 위해 사이버멀미에 대한 다양한 연구가 필요하다. 사이버멀미는 가상현실 시스템을 사용할때 나타나며 어지러움, 방향상실, 두통, 땀흘림, 눈피로도등의 증상을 포함한다. 이런 사이버멀미에는 개인차, 사용된 기술, 공간디자인, 수행된 업무등 매우 다양 요인들이 관여하고 있어 명확한 원인을 규정할 수 없다. 이런 배경으로 인해 사이버멀미 저감과 관련한 다양한 연구들이 필요하며 이는 가상현실 발전에 중요한 의미를 갖는다. 공간인지는 3차원 공간에서 신체 움직임과 대상과의 상호작용에 중요한 역할을 하는 인지시스템이다. 가상공간에서 신체 움직임은 네비게이션, 사물조작, 다른 에이전트들과 상호작용에 관여한다. 특히 가상공간에서 네비게이션은 자주 사용되는 중요한 상호작용 방식이다. 이에 가상공간을 네비게이션 할때 존재감에 영향을 주지 않고 멀미증상을 유발하지 않는 효과적인 공간이동 방법에 대한 다양한 연구들이 이루어지고 있다. 이전 연구들에 의하면 시점이 존재감과 체화감에 영향을 준다고 한다. 이는 시점에 따라 사용자의 행동과 대상들과의 상호작용 방식에 달라지기 때문이다. 따라서 가상공간에서 경험 또한 시점에 따라 달라진다. 이런 배경으로 몸의 자세, 공간인지, 이동방법, 존재감, 사이버멀미의 상호 연관성에 대한 연구를 시점에 따라 분류해서 연구할 필요가 있다. 이를 통해 가상현실 속 공간 네비게이션에 대한 인지과정을 보다 다각적으로 이해 할 수 있을 것이다. 그동안 존재감과 사이버 멀미에 내재된 매커니즘을 이해하기 위해 다양한 연구들이 진행되어 왔다. 하지만 몸의 자세에 따른 인지작용이 존재감과 사이버멀미에 어떤 영향을 주는지에 대한 연구는 거의 이루어지지 않았다. 이에 본 학위논문에서는 1인칭과 3인칭 시점으로 분류된 별도의 실험과 연구를 진행하여 가상현실에서 몸의 자세와 공간인지, 공간이동방법, 존재감, 사이버멀미의 상호연관성을 보다 심층적으로 이해하고자 한다. 제3장에서는 3인칭시점의 실험과 결과에 대한 내용을 기술했다. 3인칭시점 실험에서는 가상공간에서 몸의 자세와 존재감의 상호연관성 연구를 위해 세가지 몸의 자세 (서있는 자세, 앉은 자세, 다리를 펴고 앉은 자세)와 2가지 타입의 공간이동 자유도 (무한, 유한)를 상호 비교했다. 실험결과에 의하면 공간이동 자유도가 무한한 경우 서있는 자세에서 존재감이 높게 나타났다. 추가적으로 가상공간에서 몸의 자세와 존재감은 공간이동자유도와 관련이 있는 것으로 나타났으며 여러 인지기능 중 주의집중이 몸의 자세, 존재감, 공간인지의 통합적 상호작용을 이끌어 낸 것으로 파악되었다. 3인칭시점의 결과들을 종합해 보면 몸 자세의 인지적 영향은 공간이동자유도와 상관관계가 있는 것으로 추측할 수 있다. 제4장에서는 1인칭시점의 실험과 결과에 대한 내용을 기술했다. 1인칭시점 실험에서는 가상공간에서 몸의 자세, 공간이동방법, 존재감, 사이버멀미의 상호연관성 연구를 위해 두 조건의 몸의 자세 (서있는 자세, 앉아 있는 자세)와 네가지 타입의 이동방법 (스티어링 + 몸을 활용한 회전, 스티어링 + 도구를 활용한 회전, 텔레포테이션 + 몸을 이용한 회전, 텔레포테이션 + 도구를 활용한 회전)의 상호 비교가 이루어 졌다. 실험결과에 의하면 위치이동방식과 회전방식에 따른 공간이동자유도는 성공적인 네비게이션과 관련이 있으며 존재감에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 추가적으로 연속적으로 시각정보가 입력되는 스티어링 방법은 자가운동을 높여 비연속적 방법인 텔레포테이션보다 사이버멀미를 더 유발하는 것으로 나타났다. 1인칭시점의 결과들을 종합해 보면 가상공간에서 네비게이션을 할때 존재감과 사이버멀미는 공간이동방법과 관련이 있는 것으로 가정할 수 있다. 제3장의 3인칭 시점 실험결과에 의하면 몸의 자세와 존재감은 상관관계가 있는 것으로 제시되었다. 반면 제4장의 실험결과에 의하면 1인칭시점으로 가상공간을 네비게이션 할 때는 공간이동방법이 존재감과 사이버멀미에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이 두 실험에 대한 연구 결과를 통해 가상현실에서 몸의 자세와 공간인지 (네비게이션)의 상호연관성에 대한 이해를 확대하고 존재감 및 사이버멀미와 공간이동방법의 관련성을 밝힐 수 있을 것으로 기대한다.Immersive virtual environments (VEs) can disrupt the everyday connection between where our senses tell us we are and where we are actually located. In computer-mediated communication, the user often comes to feel that their body has become irrelevant and that it is only the presence of their mind that matters. However, virtual worlds offer users an opportunity to become aware of and explore both the role of the physical body in communication, and the implications of disembodied interactions. Previous research has suggested that cognitive functions such as execution, attention, memory, and perception differ when body position changes. However, the influence of body position on these cognitive functions is still not fully understood. In particular, little is known about how physical self-positioning may affect the cognitive process of perceptual responses in a VE. Some researchers have identified presence as a guide to what constitutes an effective virtual reality (VR) system and as the defining feature of VR. Presence is a state of consciousness related to the sense of being within a VE; in particular, it is a ‘psychological state in which the virtuality of the experience is unnoticed’. Higher levels of presence are considered to be an indicator of a more successful media experience, thus the psychological experience of ‘being there’ is an important construct to consider when investigating the association between mediated experiences on cognition. VR is known to induce cybersickness, which limits its application and highlights the need for scientific strategies to optimize virtual experiences. Cybersickness refers to the sickness associated with the use of VR systems, which has a range of symptoms including nausea, disorientation, headaches, sweating and eye strain. This is a complicated problem because the experience of cybersickness varies greatly between individuals, the technology being used, the design of the environment, and the task being performed. Thus, avoiding cybersickness represents a major challenge for VR development. Spatial cognition is an invariable precursor to action because it allows the formation of the necessary mental representations that code the positions of and relationships among objects. Thus, a number of bodily actions are represented mentally within a depicted VR space, including those functionally related to navigation, the manipulation of objects, and/or interaction with other agents. Of these actions, navigation is one of the most important and frequently used interaction tasks in VR environments. Therefore, identifying an efficient locomotion technique that does not alter presence nor cause motion sickness has become the focus of numerous studies. Though the details of the results have varied, past research has revealed that viewpoint can affect the sense of presence and the sense of embodiment. VR experience differs depending on the viewpoint of a user because this vantage point affects the actions of the user and their engagement with objects. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the association between body position, spatial cognition, locomotion method, presence, and cybersickness based on viewpoint, which may clarify the understanding of cognitive processes in VE navigation. To date, numerous detailed studies have been conducted to explore the mechanisms underlying presence and cybersickness in VR. However, few have investigated the cognitive effects of body position on presence and cybersickness. With this in mind, two separate experiments were conducted in the present study on viewpoint within VR (i.e., third-person and first-person perspectives) to further the understanding of the effects of body position in relation to spatial cognition, locomotion method, presence, and cybersickness in VEs. In Chapter 3 (Experiment 1: third-person perspective), three body positions (standing, sitting, and half-sitting) were compared in two types of VR game with a different degree of freedom in navigation (DFN; finite and infinite) to explore the association between body position and the sense of presence in VEs. The results of the analysis revealed that standing has the most significant effect on presence for the three body positions that were investigated. In addition, the outcomes of this study indicated that the cognitive effect of body position on presence is associated with the DFN in a VE. Specifically, cognitive activity related to attention orchestrates the cognitive processes associated with body position, presence, and spatial cognition, consequently leading to an integrated sense of presence in VR. It can thus be speculated that the cognitive effects of body position on presence are correlated with the DFN in a VE. In Chapter 4 (Experiment 2: first-person perspective), two body positions (standing and sitting) and four types of locomotion method (steering + embodied control [EC], steering + instrumental control [IC], teleportation + EC, and teleportation + IC) were compared to examine the relationship between body position, locomotion method, presence, and cybersickness when navigating a VE. The results of Experiment 2 suggested that the DFN for translation and rotation is related to successful navigation and affects the sense of presence when navigating a VE. In addition, steering locomotion (continuous motion) increases self-motion when navigating a VE, which results in stronger cybersickness than teleportation (non-continuous motion). Overall, it can be postulated that presence and cybersickness are associated with the method of locomotion when navigating a VE. In this dissertation, the overall results of Experiment 1 suggest that the cognitive influence of presence is body-dependent in the sense that mental and brain processes rely on or are affected by the physical body. On the other hand, the outcomes of Experiment 2 illustrate the significant effects of locomotion method on the sense of presence and cybersickness during VE navigation. Taken together, the results of this study provide new insights into the cognitive effects of body position on spatial cognition (i.e., navigation) in VR and highlight the important implications of locomotion method on presence and cybersickness in VE navigation.Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. An Introductory Overview of the Conducted Research 1 1.1.1. Presence and Body Position 1 1.1.2. Navigation, Cybersickness, and Locomotion Method 3 1.2. Research Objectives 6 1.3. Research Experimental Approach 7 Chapter 2. Theoretical Background 9 2.1. Presence 9 2.1.1. Presence and Virtual Reality 9 2.1.2. Presence and Spatiality 10 2.1.3. Presence and Action 12 2.1.4. Presence and Attention 14 2.2. Body Position 16 2.2.1. Body Position and Cognitive Effects 16 2.2.2. Body Position and Postural Control 18 2.2.3. Body Position and Postural Stability 19 2.3. Spatial Cognition: Degree of Freedom in Navigation 20 2.3.1. Degree of Freedom in Navigation and Decision-Making 20 2.4. Cybersickness 22 2.4.1. Cybersickness and Virtual Reality 22 2.4.2. Sensory Conflict Theory 22 2.4.3. Postural Instability Theory 23 2.5. Self-Motion 25 2.5.1. Vection and Virtual Reality 25 2.5.2. Self-Motion and Navigation in a VE 27 2.6. Navigation in Virtual Environments 29 2.6.1. Translation and Rotation in Navigation 29 2.6.2. Spatial Orientation and Embodiment 32 2.6.3. Locomotion Methods 37 2.6.4. Steering and Teleportation 38 Chapter 3. Experiment 1: Third-Person Perspective 40 3.1. Quantification of the Degree of Freedom in Navigation 40 3.2. Experiment 3.2.1. Experimental Design and Participants 41 3.2.2. Stimulus Materials 42 3.2.2.1. First- and Third-person Perspectives in Gameplay 43 3.2.3. Experimental Setup and Process 44 3.2.4. Measurements 45 3.3. Results 45 3.3.1. Presence: two-way ANOVA 45 3.3.2. Presence: one-way ANOVA 46 3.3.2.1. Finite Navigation Freedom 46 3.3.2.2. Infinite Navigation Freedom 47 3.3.3. Summary of the Results 48 3.4. Discussion 49 3.4.1. Presence and Body Position 49 3.4.2. Degree of Freedom in Navigation and Decision-Making 50 3.4.3. Gender Difference and Gameplay 51 3.5. Limitations 52 Chapter 4. Experiment 2: First-Person Perspective 53 4.1. Experiment 53 4.1.1. Experimental Design and Participants 53 4.1.2. Stimulus Materials 54 4.1.3. Experimental Setup and Process 55 4.1.4. Measurements 56 4.2. Results 57 4.2.1. Presence: two-way ANOVA 58 4.2.2. Cybersickness: two-way ANOVA 58 4.2.3. Presence: one-way ANOVA 60 4.2.3.1. Standing Position 60 4.2.3.2. Sitting Position 60 4.2.4. Cybersickness: one-way ANOVA 62 4.2.4.1. Standing Position 62 4.2.4.2. Sitting Position 62 4.2.5. Summary of the Results 63 4.3. Discussion 65 4.3.1. Presence 4.3.1.1. Presence and Locomotion Method 66 4.3.1.2. Presence and Body Position 68 4.3.2. Cybersickness 4.3.2.1. Cybersickness and Locomotion Method 69 4.3.2.2. Cybersickness and Body Position 70 4.4. Limitations 71 Chapter 5. Conclusion 72 5.1. Summary of Findings 72 5.2. Future Research Direction 73 References 75 Appendix A 107 Appendix B 110 국문초록 111Docto

Frequency Characteristics of Visually Induced Motion Sickness

This article was published in the journal, Human Factors [Sage Publications / © Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.]. The definitive version is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720812469046Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the frequency response of visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) for oscillating linear motion in the foreand- aft axis. Background: Simulators, virtual environments, and commercially available video games that create an illusion of self-motion are often reported to induce the symptoms seen in response to true motion. Often this human response can be the limiting factor in the acceptability and usability of such systems. Whereas motion sickness in physically moving environments is known to peak at an oscillation frequency around 0.2 Hz, it has recently been suggested that VIMS peaks at around 0.06 Hz following the proposal that the summed response of the visual and vestibular selfmotion systems is maximized at this frequency. Methods: We exposed 24 participants to random dot optical flow patterns simulating oscillating foreand- aft motion within the frequency range of 0.025 to 1.6 Hz. Before and after each 20-min exposure, VIMS was assessed with the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire. Also, a standard motion sickness scale was used to rate symptoms at 1-min intervals during each trial. Results: VIMS peaked between 0.2 and 0.4 Hz with a reducing effect at lower and higher frequencies. Conclusion: The numerical prediction of the “crossover frequency” hypothesis, and the design guidance curve previously proposed, cannot be accepted when the symptoms are purely visually induced. Application: In conditions in which stationary observers are exposed to optical flow that simulates oscillating fore-and-aft motion, frequencies around 0.2 to 0.4 Hz should be avoided

THE ROLE OF HEAD MOVEMENTS IN SIMULATOR SICKNESS GENERATED BY A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT

Virtual environments (VEs) are being used in a variety of applications, including training, rehabilitation and clinical treatment. To effectively utilize VEs in these situations it is important to try to understand some of the effects of VE exposure. The purpose of this study was to investigate head and body movements in virtual and real environments during building clearing and the relationship between these movements and simulator sickness. The data for the current study were drawn from a larger team training study which investigated the use of VEs for training building clearing. The goal of the first part of this study was to compare head movements made in a real world (RW) environment to head movements made in a VE (Analysis I). The goal of second part of this study was to examine the relationship between head movements and simulator sickness in a VE (Analysis II). The first analysis used two independent samples t-tests to examine the differences between head movements made in a VE and head movements made in a RW environment. The t-tests showed that subjects in the VE moved their heads less, t(23.438)=12.690, p\u3c0.01, and less often, t(46)=8.682, p\u3c0.05, than subjects in the RW. In the second analysis, a 3 x 20 ANOVA found a significant difference between groups with low, med, and high simulator sickness scores, F(2,21)=4.221, p\u3c0.05, ήp2= 0.287, where subjects who reported being the most sick tended to restrict their head movements more than the other two groups. For VEs to progress as a useful tool, whether for training, therapy, etc., it will be necessary to identify the variable(s) that cause people to become motion sick and restrict their head movement during VE exposure. Future studies should seek to investigate more continuous measures of sickness, perhaps psychophysiological measures, and possible effects of a negative transfer of training due to the restriction of head movements in VEs

Frequency characteristics of visually induced motion sickness

Objective: The aim of this study was to explore the frequency response of visually induced motion sickness (VIMS) for oscillating linear motion in the foreand- aft axis. Background: Simulators, virtual environments, and commercially available video games that create an illusion of self-motion are often reported to induce the symptoms seen in response to true motion. Often this human response can be the limiting factor in the acceptability and usability of such systems. Whereas motion sickness in physically moving environments is known to peak at an oscillation frequency around 0.2 Hz, it has recently been suggested that VIMS peaks at around 0.06 Hz following the proposal that the summed response of the visual and vestibular selfmotion systems is maximized at this frequency. Methods: We exposed 24 participants to random dot optical flow patterns simulating oscillating foreand- aft motion within the frequency range of 0.025 to 1.6 Hz. Before and after each 20-min exposure, VIMS was assessed with the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire. Also, a standard motion sickness scale was used to rate symptoms at 1-min intervals during each trial. Results: VIMS peaked between 0.2 and 0.4 Hz with a reducing effect at lower and higher frequencies. Conclusion: The numerical prediction of the “crossover frequency” hypothesis, and the design guidance curve previously proposed, cannot be accepted when the symptoms are purely visually induced. Application: In conditions in which stationary observers are exposed to optical flow that simulates oscillating fore-and-aft motion, frequencies around 0.2 to 0.4 Hz should be avoided