1,785 research outputs found
Belief Revision with Uncertain Inputs in the Possibilistic Setting
This paper discusses belief revision under uncertain inputs in the framework
of possibility theory. Revision can be based on two possible definitions of the
conditioning operation, one based on min operator which requires a purely
ordinal scale only, and another based on product, for which a richer structure
is needed, and which is a particular case of Dempster's rule of conditioning.
Besides, revision under uncertain inputs can be understood in two different
ways depending on whether the input is viewed, or not, as a constraint to
enforce. Moreover, it is shown that M.A. Williams' transmutations, originally
defined in the setting of Spohn's functions, can be captured in this framework,
as well as Boutilier's natural revision.Comment: Appears in Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Uncertainty in
Artificial Intelligence (UAI1996
Encoding Markov Logic Networks in Possibilistic Logic
Markov logic uses weighted formulas to compactly encode a probability
distribution over possible worlds. Despite the use of logical formulas, Markov
logic networks (MLNs) can be difficult to interpret, due to the often
counter-intuitive meaning of their weights. To address this issue, we propose a
method to construct a possibilistic logic theory that exactly captures what can
be derived from a given MLN using maximum a posteriori (MAP) inference.
Unfortunately, the size of this theory is exponential in general. We therefore
also propose two methods which can derive compact theories that still capture
MAP inference, but only for specific types of evidence. These theories can be
used, among others, to make explicit the hidden assumptions underlying an MLN
or to explain the predictions it makes.Comment: Extended version of a paper appearing in UAI 201
Characterizing and Extending Answer Set Semantics using Possibility Theory
Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a popular framework for modeling
combinatorial problems. However, ASP cannot easily be used for reasoning about
uncertain information. Possibilistic ASP (PASP) is an extension of ASP that
combines possibilistic logic and ASP. In PASP a weight is associated with each
rule, where this weight is interpreted as the certainty with which the
conclusion can be established when the body is known to hold. As such, it
allows us to model and reason about uncertain information in an intuitive way.
In this paper we present new semantics for PASP, in which rules are interpreted
as constraints on possibility distributions. Special models of these
constraints are then identified as possibilistic answer sets. In addition,
since ASP is a special case of PASP in which all the rules are entirely
certain, we obtain a new characterization of ASP in terms of constraints on
possibility distributions. This allows us to uncover a new form of disjunction,
called weak disjunction, that has not been previously considered in the
literature. In addition to introducing and motivating the semantics of weak
disjunction, we also pinpoint its computational complexity. In particular,
while the complexity of most reasoning tasks coincides with standard
disjunctive ASP, we find that brave reasoning for programs with weak
disjunctions is easier.Comment: 39 pages and 16 pages appendix with proofs. This article has been
accepted for publication in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming,
Copyright Cambridge University Pres
Towards possibilistic fuzzy answer set programming
Fuzzy answer set programming (FASP) is a generalization of answer set programming to continuous domains. As it can not readily take uncertainty into account, however, FASP is not suitable as a basis for approximate reasoning and cannot easily be used to derive conclusions from imprecise information. To cope with this, we propose an extension of FASP based on possibility theory. The resulting framework allows us to reason about uncertain information in continuous domains, and thus also about information that is imprecise or vague. We propose a syntactic procedure, based on an immediate consequence operator, and provide a characterization in terms of minimal models, which allows us to straightforwardly implement our framework using existing FASP solvers
Practical Model-Based Diagnosis with Qualitative Possibilistic Uncertainty
An approach to fault isolation that exploits vastly incomplete models is
presented. It relies on separate descriptions of each component behavior,
together with the links between them, which enables focusing of the reasoning
to the relevant part of the system. As normal observations do not need
explanation, the behavior of the components is limited to anomaly propagation.
Diagnostic solutions are disorders (fault modes or abnormal signatures) that
are consistent with the observations, as well as abductive explanations. An
ordinal representation of uncertainty based on possibility theory provides a
simple exception-tolerant description of the component behaviors. We can for
instance distinguish between effects that are more or less certainly present
(or absent) and effects that are more or less certainly present (or absent)
when a given anomaly is present. A realistic example illustrates the benefits
of this approach.Comment: Appears in Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in
Artificial Intelligence (UAI1995
Possibilistic Boolean games: strategic reasoning under incomplete information
Boolean games offer a compact alternative to normal-form games, by encoding the goal of each agent as a propositional formula. In this paper, we show how this framework can be naturally extended to model situations in which agents are uncertain about other agents' goals. We first use uncertainty measures from possibility theory to semantically define (solution concepts to) Boolean games with incomplete information. Then we present a syntactic characterization of these semantics, which can readily be implemented, and we characterize the computational complexity
- …