Investment decisions and portfolios classificationbased on robust methods of estimation

In the process of assets selection and their allocation to the investment portfolio the most important factor issue thing is the accurate evaluation of the volatility of the return rate. In order to achieve stable and accurate estimates of parameters for contaminated multivariate normal distributions the robust estimators are required. In this paper we used some of the robust estimators to selection the optimal investment portfolios. The main goal of this paper was the comparative analysis of generated investment portfolios with respect to chosen robust estimation methods.Investment decisions, robust estimators, portfolios classification, cluster analysis 1. Introduction

Robust portfolio management with multiple financial analysts

Portfolio selection theory, developed by Markowitz (1952), is one of the best known and widely applied methods for allocating funds among possible investment choices, where investment decision making is a trade-off between the expected return and risk of the portfolio. Many portfolio selection models have been developed on the basis of Markowitz’s theory. Most of them assume that complete investment information is available and that it can be accurately extracted from the historical data. However, this complete information never exists in reality. There are many kinds of ambiguity and vagueness which cannot be dealt with in the historical data but still need to be considered in portfolio selection. For example, to address the issue of uncertainty caused by estimation errors, the robust counterpart approach of Ben-Tal and Nemirovski (1998) has been employed frequently in recent years. Robustification, however, often leads to a more conservative solution. As a consequence, one of the most common critiques against the robust counterpart approach is the excessively pessimistic character of the robust asset allocation. This thesis attempts to develop new approaches to improve on the respective performances of the robust counterpart approach by incorporating additional investment information sources, so that the optimal portfolio can be more reliable and, at the same time, achieve a greater return. [Continues.

A Generalized Description Length Approach for Sparse and Robust Index Tracking

We develop a new minimum description length criterion for index tracking, which deals with two main issues affecting portfolio weights: estimation errors and model misspecification. The criterion minimizes the uncertainty related to data distribution and model parameters by means of a generalized q-entropy measure, and performs model selection and estimation in a single step, by assuming a prior distribution on portfolio weights. The new approach results in sparse and robust portfolios in presence of outliers and high correlation, by penalizing observations and parameters that highly diverge from the assumed data model and prior distribution. The Monte Carlo simulations and the empirical study on financial data confirm the properties and the advantages of the proposed approach compared to state-of-art methods

A Robust Statistics Approach to Minimum Variance Portfolio Optimization

We study the design of portfolios under a minimum risk criterion. The performance of the optimized portfolio relies on the accuracy of the estimated covariance matrix of the portfolio asset returns. For large portfolios, the number of available market returns is often of similar order to the number of assets, so that the sample covariance matrix performs poorly as a covariance estimator. Additionally, financial market data often contain outliers which, if not correctly handled, may further corrupt the covariance estimation. We address these shortcomings by studying the performance of a hybrid covariance matrix estimator based on Tyler's robust M-estimator and on Ledoit-Wolf's shrinkage estimator while assuming samples with heavy-tailed distribution. Employing recent results from random matrix theory, we develop a consistent estimator of (a scaled version of) the realized portfolio risk, which is minimized by optimizing online the shrinkage intensity. Our portfolio optimization method is shown via simulations to outperform existing methods both for synthetic and real market data

Direct Data-Driven Portfolio Optimization with Guaranteed Shortfall Probability

This paper proposes a novel methodology for optimal allocation of a portfolio of risky financial assets. Most existing methods that aim at compromising between portfolio performance (e.g., expected return) and its risk (e.g., volatility or shortfall probability) need some statistical model of the asset returns. This means that: ({\em i}) one needs to make rather strong assumptions on the market for eliciting a return distribution, and ({\em ii}) the parameters of this distribution need be somehow estimated, which is quite a critical aspect, since optimal portfolios will then depend on the way parameters are estimated. Here we propose instead a direct, data-driven, route to portfolio optimization that avoids both of the mentioned issues: the optimal portfolios are computed directly from historical data, by solving a sequence of convex optimization problems (typically, linear programs). Much more importantly, the resulting portfolios are theoretically backed by a guarantee that their expected shortfall is no larger than an a-priori assigned level. This result is here obtained assuming efficiency of the market, under no hypotheses on the shape of the joint distribution of the asset returns, which can remain unknown and need not be estimate